Analyse
14 juillet 2017

Vade-mecum du Barreau de Paris pour les avocats réalisant des enquêtes internes (En anglais)

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017

 

NAVACELLE translated, for information purposes, the Vademecum for Attorneys tasked with carrying out an internal investigation, issued by the Paris Bar on July 12, 2017.

***

Vademecum for Attorneys tasked with carrying out an internal investigation

Through a resolution passed on March 8, 2016, the Paris Bar Council considered that internal investigations fell within the scope of an attorney’s professional tasks (excluding the activity of research and investigation provided for by article L621.1 of the National Security Code), under the scope of article 6.2 al. 5 of the National Regulations of the lawyers’ profession (RIN) (expertise activity), or under the scope of articles 6.1 and 6.2 al. 2 of the RIN (assistance and counselling activities).

In accordance with this resolution, recommendations were made with respect to this activity for the purpose of their incorporation in the RIBP.

Some of these recommendations are general in scope (1), others are specific to internal investigations carried out in the context of the assistance and advisory activities of attorneys (2) or to the internal investigation carried out by an attorney in his/her capacity as an expert.

 1. General recommendations

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation must comply with, under all circumstances, our essential principles (article 1.3 RIN). He/she will comply with the essential principles of conscience, independence, humanity, loyalty, delicacy, moderation, competence and prudence. He/she will refrain from exerting pressure on individuals he/she interviews;

The attorney will execute, with his/her client or the persons who appointed him/her, a contract which, in addition to the determination of costs, will define the scope of his/her retention;

Before any contact with third parties for the purpose of carrying out the internal investigation, he/she will explain his/her role and its non-coercive nature; inform them that they may not claim any attorney-client privilege with respect to exchanges and that what they say may be transcribed in his/her report in whole or in part.

2. Specific recommendations for the activity of internal investigation carried out by an attorney in the context of an assistance and counselling activities (articles 6.1 and 6.2 al. 2 of the RIN)

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation in the context of an assistance or counselling activity may be the usual attorney of the client who commissioned him/her or an attorney who has not previously worked for him/her;

In all circumstances, he/she will mention to the individuals he/she interviews in the course of the internal investigation that he/she is not their attorney but that he/she acts on behalf of the client who retained him/her to carry out this investigation;

He/she will explain to interviewees and to other persons contacted for the needs of the investigation that the attorney-client privilege binds him/her but not the client. Therefore, what the interviewee says what they say and any other information gathered during the investigation may be used by his/her client, so may be the report he/she may provide to his/her client.

He/she will inform the interviewee that he/she may be assisted or advised by an attorney when it appears, prior to or during the interview, that the interviewee may be held accountable for any wrongdoing at the outcome of the investigation;

When a statement is transcribed verbatim, he/she will offer to the interviewee an opportunity to review the statement and to sign it. He/she will refrain from providing him/her with a copy if the preservation of the confidentiality of the investigation requires otherwise – with regards to French or foreign rules on confidentiality -;

He/she may assist his/her client in a mutual agreement procedure or in a dispute, related or subsequent to the internal investigation, but will refrain from representing his/her client in such a procedure directed against an individual that he/she has interviewed during the internal investigation.

3. Specific recommendations for the activity of internal investigation carried out by an attorney in the context of an expertise activity (article 6.2 al. 5 RIN)

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation, in the context of an expertise activity, will not accept this mission if he/she already is the counsel, usual or not, of the person(s) retaining him/her;

He/she will mention that in the context of an expertise mission, the internal investigation is not subject to the attorney-client privilege; he/she will ensure that documents, correspondence and other exchanges related to this investigation are split from the matters he is tasked with carrying out as an attorney, in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege by which he/she is bound in this capacity.

When a deposition is transcribed verbatim, he/she will offer the interviewee an opportunity to review the statement and to sign it; he/she will provide a copy upon the interviewee’s request, except in specific circumstances.

He/she will refrain from representing one of the parties in any procedure relating to or arising from the internal investigation, even in an amicable procedure.

Contenu similaire

Publication
29 janvier 2026
Les conséquences réglementaires d’un arbitrage frauduleux : leçons de l’affaire TotalEnergies
Navacelle contribue au magazine The Legal Industry Reviews, dans sa section "Regulatory and Sanctions", en présentant un exemple rare de...
Analyse
5 décembre 2025
La future directive 2023/0135 (COD) relative à la lutte contre la corruption
La Délégation des Barreaux de France publie dans son dernier numéro de l'Observateur de Bruxelles un dossier complet consacré à...
Analyse
5 novembre 2025
Une proposition de loi pour moderniser et renforcer les pouvoirs de l’AMF
Le 16 septembre 2025, une proposition de loi a été déposée à l’Assemblée nationale visant à accroître les pouvoirs de...
Actualité
28 avril 2026
Enquêtes internes : faut-il légiférer ?
Une réflexion portée notamment par Stéphane de Navacelle, en faveur d’un encadrement législatif équilibré des enquêtes internes....
Publication
27 avril 2026
Lafarge : Une décision marquante pour le droit pénal des affaires et les systèmes de...
Dans un article co-écrit, publié dans le Global Investigation Review (GIR), Stéphane de Navacelle met en lumière une évolution...
Revue de presse
24 avril 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 24 avril 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur la perquisition des locaux d’Engie dans le cadre d’une information judiciaire...
Analyse
22 avril 2026
Corruption: ce que révèle l’Indice de perception de la corruption 2025 de Transparency International...
L’indice de perception de la corruption 2025, publié par Transparency International, met en évidence une baisse de la moyenne...
Revue de presse
17 avril 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 17 avril 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur la condamnation par le tribunal correctionnel de Paris de trois personnes...
Événement
17 avril 2026
[GACS 2026] Enquêtes 2026 : de l’alerte à l’investigation. Comment allier concrètement conformité avec...
Table ronde consacrée aux enquêtes internes, organisée par Business & Legal Forums, dans le cadre du Global Anticorruption & Compliance...
2 min
Publication
14 avril 2026
Les coûts de l’arbitrage : comment les maîtriser et les anticiper ?
Maxime Desplats, dans un article consacré aux coûts de l’arbitrage publié dans la section Arbitrage et Médiation de la Revue...
Revue de presse
10 avril 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 10 avril 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur l’adoption en première lecture du projet de loi de lutte contre...
Analyse
9 avril 2026
Accords de non-débauchage et pratiques anticoncurrentielles : retour sur la décision du 11 juin 2025...
Dans un contexte de vigilance accrue des autorités de concurrence à l’égard des pratiques affectant les marchés du travail, un...
Revue de presse
3 avril 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 3 avril 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur l’adoption par le Parlement européen de la première directive anticorruption de...
Événement
3 avril 2026
Le blanchiment d’argent à l’ère de la cryptomonnaie
Conférence sur la lutte contre blanchiment d'argent, présentée aux étudiants du Master 2 Droit pénal économique et de la conformité...
2 min
Analyse
31 mars 2026
CACEIS Bank : Décision de la Commission des sanctions de l’AMF du 17 décembre 2025
Après l’affaire H2O AM qui avait donné lieu à une sanction de cette société de gestion en 2022, l’AMF s’est...