Analysis
14 July 2017

Paris Bar vademecum for lawyers carrying out internal investigations

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017

 

NAVACELLE translated, for information purposes, the Vademecum for Attorneys tasked with carrying out an internal investigation, issued by the Paris Bar on July 12, 2017.

***

Vademecum for Attorneys tasked with carrying out an internal investigation

Through a resolution passed on March 8, 2016, the Paris Bar Council considered that internal investigations fell within the scope of an attorney’s professional tasks (excluding the activity of research and investigation provided for by article L621.1 of the National Security Code), under the scope of article 6.2 al. 5 of the National Regulations of the lawyers’ profession (RIN) (expertise activity), or under the scope of articles 6.1 and 6.2 al. 2 of the RIN (assistance and counselling activities).

In accordance with this resolution, recommendations were made with respect to this activity for the purpose of their incorporation in the RIBP.

Some of these recommendations are general in scope (1), others are specific to internal investigations carried out in the context of the assistance and advisory activities of attorneys (2) or to the internal investigation carried out by an attorney in his/her capacity as an expert.

 1. General recommendations

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation must comply with, under all circumstances, our essential principles (article 1.3 RIN). He/she will comply with the essential principles of conscience, independence, humanity, loyalty, delicacy, moderation, competence and prudence. He/she will refrain from exerting pressure on individuals he/she interviews;

The attorney will execute, with his/her client or the persons who appointed him/her, a contract which, in addition to the determination of costs, will define the scope of his/her retention;

Before any contact with third parties for the purpose of carrying out the internal investigation, he/she will explain his/her role and its non-coercive nature; inform them that they may not claim any attorney-client privilege with respect to exchanges and that what they say may be transcribed in his/her report in whole or in part.

2. Specific recommendations for the activity of internal investigation carried out by an attorney in the context of an assistance and counselling activities (articles 6.1 and 6.2 al. 2 of the RIN)

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation in the context of an assistance or counselling activity may be the usual attorney of the client who commissioned him/her or an attorney who has not previously worked for him/her;

In all circumstances, he/she will mention to the individuals he/she interviews in the course of the internal investigation that he/she is not their attorney but that he/she acts on behalf of the client who retained him/her to carry out this investigation;

He/she will explain to interviewees and to other persons contacted for the needs of the investigation that the attorney-client privilege binds him/her but not the client. Therefore, what the interviewee says what they say and any other information gathered during the investigation may be used by his/her client, so may be the report he/she may provide to his/her client.

He/she will inform the interviewee that he/she may be assisted or advised by an attorney when it appears, prior to or during the interview, that the interviewee may be held accountable for any wrongdoing at the outcome of the investigation;

When a statement is transcribed verbatim, he/she will offer to the interviewee an opportunity to review the statement and to sign it. He/she will refrain from providing him/her with a copy if the preservation of the confidentiality of the investigation requires otherwise – with regards to French or foreign rules on confidentiality -;

He/she may assist his/her client in a mutual agreement procedure or in a dispute, related or subsequent to the internal investigation, but will refrain from representing his/her client in such a procedure directed against an individual that he/she has interviewed during the internal investigation.

3. Specific recommendations for the activity of internal investigation carried out by an attorney in the context of an expertise activity (article 6.2 al. 5 RIN)

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation, in the context of an expertise activity, will not accept this mission if he/she already is the counsel, usual or not, of the person(s) retaining him/her;

He/she will mention that in the context of an expertise mission, the internal investigation is not subject to the attorney-client privilege; he/she will ensure that documents, correspondence and other exchanges related to this investigation are split from the matters he is tasked with carrying out as an attorney, in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege by which he/she is bound in this capacity.

When a deposition is transcribed verbatim, he/she will offer the interviewee an opportunity to review the statement and to sign it; he/she will provide a copy upon the interviewee’s request, except in specific circumstances.

He/she will refrain from representing one of the parties in any procedure relating to or arising from the internal investigation, even in an amicable procedure.

Related content

Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
15 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 15 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the Public Prosecutor’s submissions against Nicolas Sarkozy in the Libyan financing case; a decision of...
Event
13 May 2026
Still alive and kicking : mutations of global anti-corruption enforcement
A roundtable discussion on the management of cross-border investigations and audits related to compliance and cooperation with authorities, as part...
Publication
11 May 2026
The European Union takes a new step in the fight against corruption
Vincent Filhol and Walter Siefert discuss the first European directive on combating corruption in an article published in Dalloz.
Press review
7 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 7 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the first conviction based on a presumption of real estate money laundering upheld by the...
News
6 May 2026
Investigations into the social media platform X: The U.S. rejection of a French request for...
In Ana De Liz’s article “Denied French cooperation request shows limits of Paris’ ambitious cybercrime unit,” published in the GIR,...
Press review
30 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 30 April 2026
This week’s press review covers the sanction imposed by the French Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) on...
Press review
24 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 24 April 2026
This week’s press review looks back at the search of Engie premises as part of a judicial investigation into allegations...
Analysis
22 April 2026
Corruption: what Transparency International’s 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index reveals
The 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index, published by Transparency International, highlights a decline in the global average, including in countries that...
Press review
17 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 17 April 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction by the Paris Criminal Court of three individuals for insider trading, constituting one...
Event
17 April 2026
[GACS 2026] Investigations 2026: From Early Warning to Investigation. How Can We Effectively Balance Compliance...
Roundtable discussion on internal investigations, organized by Business & Legal Forums, as part of the Global Anticorruption & Compliance Summit.
2 min
Publication
14 April 2026
The Costs of Arbitration: How to Manage and Anticipate Them?
In an article on the costs of arbitration published in the Arbitration and Mediation section of the Revue des directions...
Press review
10 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 10 April 2026
This week’s press review focuses on the adoption at first reading of the bill to combat social security and tax...