Analyse
14 juillet 2017

Droit du devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des sociétés contractantes (En anglais)

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Contenu similaire

Actualité
14 juillet 2026
Bastille Day newsletter 2026
Pour le 14 juillet, l’équipe Navacelle vous propose, comme chaque année, un aperçu des événements marquants survenus en France au...
Publication
29 janvier 2026
Les conséquences réglementaires d’un arbitrage frauduleux : leçons de l’affaire TotalEnergies
Navacelle contribue au magazine The Legal Industry Reviews, dans sa section "Regulatory and Sanctions", en présentant un exemple rare de...
Revue de presse
18 septembre 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 14 septembre 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur l’ouverture du procès pour corruption de Rachida Dati et Carlos Ghosn devant le...
Revue de presse
11 septembre 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 7 septembre 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur la publication par l’Agence française anticorruption d’un guide pratique consacré à l’évaluation des...
Événement
11 septembre 2026
Stratégies contractuelles
Conférence dédiée aux étudiants du Master 2 Juriste d'affaires, éthique et compliance de l'Université Lumière Lyon 2.
Vidéo
8 septembre 2026
Décryptage de la décision du 9 juillet 2026 de la Commission des sanctions de l’Agence...
Julie Zorrilla, associée du cabinet Navacelle, est intervenue aux cotés de François Malan, lors d’un webinaire du Cercle de la...
Analyse
7 septembre 2026
Publication par l’AFA d’un guide pratique sur le dispositif d’alerte interne
Le 16 juillet 2026, l’Agence Française Anti-corruption a publié un guide pratique intitulé “Mettre en place un dispositif d’alerte interne...
Revue de presse
4 septembre 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 31 août 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur l’entrée en vigueur du régime des pénalités financières appliquées aux produits d’ultrafast-fashion, sur...
Revue de presse
28 août 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 28 août 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur l’accord conclu par Meta avec la quasi-totalité des Etats américains afin de clore...
Événement
27 août 2026
[REF 2026] Souveraineté économique : le droit doit devenir une arme
À l'occasion de la Rencontre des Entrepreneurs de France 2026 (REF), organisée par le MEDEF, Stéphane de Navacelle est intervenu...
Revue de presse
21 août 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 21 août 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur la publication d’une circulaire du Premier ministre visant à renforcer la lutte contre...
Revue de presse
14 août 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 14 août 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur l’appel formé par Meta d’une décision de l’Autorité de la Concurrence, la saisine...
Revue de presse
7 août 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 7 août 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur le classement sans suite de la plainte visant Charles Alloncle pour prise illégal...
Revue de presse
31 juillet 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 31 juillet 2026
La revue de cette semaine revient sur l’appel formé par TotalEnergies à l’encontre du jugement relatif au devoir de vigilance,...