Analysis
14 July 2017

Duty of care of parent and contracting companies law

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Related content

Publication
8 July 2025
Bastille Day Newsletter 2025
As they do every year for 14 July, Navacelle's lawyers offer you a selection of noticeable events which occurred in...
Analysis
20 May 2025
CJIP Paprec: criminal penalties applicable to violations of the rules governing public procurement
On 10 February 2025, Paprec signed a “Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public” – CJIP (equivalent to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement) to...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
11 July 2025
Press review – Week of 7 July 2025
This week's press review covers the ongoing trial of a fictitious employment case at Le Canard enchaîné, the sanctioning of...
Publication
8 July 2025
Observatory of Judicial Agreements of Public Interest
Over the past 12 months, 16 CJIPs have been concluded, reflecting a rise in fines, particularly in environmental and tax-related...
Publication
8 July 2025
The French Financial Markets Authority activity
In 2024, the AMF reduced the number of investigations and inspections, while strengthening its cooperation with judicial authorities. It issued...
Publication
8 July 2025
The French data protection authority activity
In 2024, the CNIL intensified inspections and cooperation, especially on cookies, cybersecurity, and AI. It handled nearly 18,000 complaints and...
Publication
8 July 2025
The French Prudential Supervision and Resolution Authority activity
In 2024, the ACPR strengthened its oversight, particularly in anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing, through targeted inspections and audits of...
Publication
8 July 2025
2024, an active year for French regulators
French regulators have been highly active in 2024, with more investigations, hefty fines, and stronger cooperation both nationally and internationally.
Publication
8 July 2025
Trends in environmental criminal law & duty of vigilance and their consequences in France
Environmental law and duty of vigilance, both seen as forward-looking topics expected to generate significant litigation, are currently following two...
Publication
8 July 2025
Evolution of white collar crime: Between regulatory strengthening and judicial trend-setting
The fight for integrity is intensifying in France, with more high-profile trials, strengthened anti-money laundering regulations, and evolving case law,...
Publication
8 July 2025
The proposed reform of French arbitration law
The working group on arbitration reform submitted its report to the Minister of Justice pn 20 March 2025. The report...
Publication
8 July 2025
A year of criminal justice: focus on 6 major criminal trials
A look at six criminal trials that have shaped the French judicial landscape over the past twelve months, due to...
Publication
8 July 2025
AFA news on matters of fighting against corruption & breaches of integrity
Eight years after the Sapin II Law came into force, the French Anti-Corruption Agency continues its efforts to combat corruption...