Analysis
14 July 2017

Duty of care of parent and contracting companies law

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Related content

Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
15 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 15 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the Public Prosecutor’s submissions against Nicolas Sarkozy in the Libyan financing case; a decision of...
Event
13 May 2026
Still alive and kicking : mutations of global anti-corruption enforcement
A roundtable discussion on the management of cross-border investigations and audits related to compliance and cooperation with authorities, as part...
Publication
11 May 2026
The European Union takes a new step in the fight against corruption
Vincent Filhol and Walter Siefert discuss the first European directive on combating corruption in an article published in Dalloz.
Press review
7 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 7 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the first conviction based on a presumption of real estate money laundering upheld by the...
News
6 May 2026
Investigations into the social media platform X: The U.S. rejection of a French request for...
In Ana De Liz’s article “Denied French cooperation request shows limits of Paris’ ambitious cybercrime unit,” published in the GIR,...
Press review
30 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 30 April 2026
This week’s press review covers the sanction imposed by the French Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) on...
Press review
24 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 24 April 2026
This week’s press review looks back at the search of Engie premises as part of a judicial investigation into allegations...
Analysis
22 April 2026
Corruption: what Transparency International’s 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index reveals
The 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index, published by Transparency International, highlights a decline in the global average, including in countries that...
Press review
17 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 17 April 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction by the Paris Criminal Court of three individuals for insider trading, constituting one...
Event
17 April 2026
[GACS 2026] Investigations 2026: From Early Warning to Investigation. How Can We Effectively Balance Compliance...
Roundtable discussion on internal investigations, organized by Business & Legal Forums, as part of the Global Anticorruption & Compliance Summit.
2 min
Publication
14 April 2026
The Costs of Arbitration: How to Manage and Anticipate Them?
In an article on the costs of arbitration published in the Arbitration and Mediation section of the Revue des directions...
Press review
10 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 10 April 2026
This week’s press review focuses on the adoption at first reading of the bill to combat social security and tax...