Analysis
14 July 2017

Duty of care of parent and contracting companies law

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Related content

Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Press review
3 July 2026
Press Review – Week of 3 July 2026
This week, the press review looks at the searches conducted as part of an investigation into the misappropriation of European...
Press review
26 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 26 June 2026
This week, the press review looks at the search of the premises of the Altrad Group as part of a...
Publication
26 June 2026
The Court of Auditors’ report on anti-corruption policy: a strengthened legal framework facing operational limits
In an article published by the GRASCO journal, Vincent Flihol and Juliette Mourques analyse the findings of the recent Court...
Press review
19 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 19 June 2026
This week’s review looks at the indictment of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Zapatero on charges of influence peddling...
Event
19 June 2026
«Private Equity, Hedge Funds, Crypto and the Shadow Banking Challenge»
The 22nd Annual Anti‑Corruption Conference of the International Bar Association brought together a panel of legal practitioners, compliance experts and...
Press review
12 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 12 June 2026
This week’s press review looks at the announcement by the French Financial Markets Authority (AMF) that its 2026 report will...
Publication
8 June 2026
Competition law enforcement in labor markets : a new trend
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 12th edition, focusing on the French Competition Authority’s decision sanctioning the SNMSF for...
Press review
5 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 5 June 2026
This week’s press review covers the concerns raised by Transparency International France following the publication of the French Agence française...
Press review
29 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 29 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction of Patrick Balkany in two separate cases involving the misappropriation of public funds;...
Press review
22 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 22 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the appellate conviction of Airbus and Air France for involuntary manslaughter in connection with the...
Press review
15 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 15 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the Public Prosecutor’s submissions against Nicolas Sarkozy in the Libyan financing case; a decision of...
Event
13 May 2026
Still alive and kicking : mutations of global anti-corruption enforcement
A roundtable discussion on the management of cross-border investigations and audits related to compliance and cooperation with authorities, as part...