Analyse
14 juillet 2017

Droit du devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des sociétés contractantes (En anglais)

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Contenu similaire

Publication
8 juillet 2025
Bastille Day newsletter 2025
Pour le 14 juillet, l’équipe Navacelle vous propose, comme chaque année, un aperçu des événements marquants survenus en France au...
Analyse
19 mai 2025
CJIP Paprec : retour sur la répression pénale en cas de violation des règles d’attribution...
Le 10 février 2025, Paprec a signé une Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public (CJIP) afin de mettre fin aux poursuites à...
Revue de presse
28 novembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 24 novembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur la perquisition menée au siège de Sanofi par l’Office national antifraude et...
Analyse
27 novembre 2025
“Fraudes au président” : quelle responsabilité pour les banques ?
Par deux arrêts du 12 juin 2025, la Cour de cassation a précisé les conditions dans lesquelles une banque peut...
Revue de presse
21 novembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 17 novembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur l’arrivée de Vincent Filhol en qualité d’associé au sein du cabinet Navacelle,...
Analyse
18 novembre 2025
Condamnation de Total pour pratiques commerciales trompeuses en matière environnementale
Le 23 octobre 2025, la 34e chambre du tribunal judiciaire de Paris a condamné TotalEnergies et TotalEnergies Electricité et Gaz...
Revue de presse
14 novembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 10 novembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur la libération, sous contrôle judiciaire, de Nicolas Sarkozy, après vingt jours de...
Revue de presse
7 novembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 3 novembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur la saisine de la Cour suprême des États-Unis concernant la légalité des...
Événement
7 novembre 2025
Sapin 2 : une perspective sur la lutte contre la corruption en France – Cornell University
Une présentation aux étudiants en droit de la Cornell University, le 7 novembre 2025, de la loi Sapin 2 et...
Actualité
6 novembre 2025
Nomination : Vincent Filhol rejoint Navacelle en tant qu’associé
Navacelle annonce l’arrivée de Vincent Filhol en qualité d’associé, renforçant sa pratique en droit pénal des affaires, enquêtes et conformité....
Analyse
5 novembre 2025
Une proposition de loi pour moderniser et renforcer les pouvoirs de l’AMF
Le 16 septembre 2025, une proposition de loi a été déposée à l’Assemblée nationale visant à accroître les pouvoirs de...
Revue de presse
31 octobre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 27 octobre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur la décision de la remise en liberté de l’ancien banquier Wahib Nacer,...
Publication
24 octobre 2025
CumCum : CACIB conclut un accord avec le Parquet National Financier
Navacelle contribue au magazine The Legal Industry Reviews, dans sa section "Regulatory and Sanctions", en présentant l'accord conclu par CACIB...
Revue de presse
24 octobre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 20 octobre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur la mise en demeure d’Airbus Atlantic par la Ligue des Droits de...