Analyse
14 juillet 2017

Droit du devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des sociétés contractantes (En anglais)

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Contenu similaire

Publication
29 janvier 2026
Les conséquences réglementaires d’un arbitrage frauduleux : leçons de l’affaire TotalEnergies
Navacelle contribue au magazine The Legal Industry Reviews, dans sa section "Regulatory and Sanctions", en présentant un exemple rare de...
Analyse
5 décembre 2025
La future directive 2023/0135 (COD) relative à la lutte contre la corruption
La Délégation des Barreaux de France publie dans son dernier numéro de l'Observateur de Bruxelles un dossier complet consacré à...
Analyse
5 novembre 2025
Une proposition de loi pour moderniser et renforcer les pouvoirs de l’AMF
Le 16 septembre 2025, une proposition de loi a été déposée à l’Assemblée nationale visant à accroître les pouvoirs de...
Analyse
9 avril 2026
Gentlemen’s agreements, accords de non-débauchage, et clauses de non-sollicitation : Présentation de la décision de...
Dans un contexte de vigilance accrue des autorités de concurrence à l’égard des pratiques affectant les marchés du travail, un...
Revue de presse
3 avril 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 3 avril 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur l’adoption par le Parlement européen de la première directive anticorruption de...
Événement
3 avril 2026
Le blanchiment d’argent à l’ère de la cryptomonnaie
Conférence sur la lutte contre blanchiment d'argent, présentée aux étudiants du Master 2 Droit pénal économique et de la conformité...
2 min
Analyse
31 mars 2026
CACEIS Bank : Décision de la Commission des sanctions de l’AMF du 17 décembre 2025
Après l’affaire H2O AM qui avait donné lieu à une sanction de cette société de gestion en 2022, l’AMF s’est...
Événement
30 mars 2026
[PAW 2026] La nouvelle géopolitique de l’arbitrage
Conférence sur la nouvelle géopolitique de l'arbitrage, tenue au Tribunal des activités économiques de Paris dans le cadre de la...
2 min
Revue de presse
27 mars 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 27 mars 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur la publication par la Direction générale de la Sécurité Intérieure d’un...
Revue de presse
20 mars 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 16 mars 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur l’arrêt de la Cour de cassation relatif à la fraude dite...
Analyse
19 mars 2026
Retour sur la CJIP conclue entre la société HSBC et le PNF pour des faits...
Dans le cadre du dossier CumCum, le PNF et la société HSBC Bank plc ont conclu une convention judiciaire d’intérêt...
Revue de presse
13 mars 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 9 mars 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur la condamnation de la société-mère du groupe Rocher pour manquement à...
Événement
11 mars 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026- La lutte contre les biais et le bruit qui, inconsciemment, affectent...
Navacelle organise le 26 mars 2026, une conférence, dans le cadre de la Paris Arbitration Week (PAW).
Événement
10 mars 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026- Fraus omnia corrumpit… Vraiment ? Les juges français et l’exécution des...
Navacelle organise le 24 mars 2026, une conférence portant sur les thèmes de la Corruption et de l'Arbitrage, dans le...
Revue de presse
6 mars 2026
Revue de presse – Semaine du 2 mars 2026
La revue de presse de cette semaine revient sur la conclusion d’une convention judiciaire d’intérêt public entre le Parquet national...