Analyse
14 juillet 2021

Une analyse du projet de la loi sur la restitution des biens mal acquis (En anglais)

Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Actualités législatives et réglementaires

 

The concept of asset recovery refers to the process by which assets misappropriated through certain offences are confiscated, recovered, and repatriated to the country from which they were wrongly removed[i].

The amount of confiscations executed in France reached 253.4 million euros in 2019[ii]. Nevertheless, the French system still does not provide, to date, for a mechanism allowing the restitution of assets derived from corruption to local populations, even though the United Nations Convention against Corruption, to which France is a signatory, declares a general principle of cooperation and assistance between States concerning the restitution of illicit assets to these populations[iii].

While the most privileged populations can compensate for their State’s failure to fight corruption and the misappropriation of assets by public officials, the poorest populations suffer from the consequences of these misappropriations[iv].

This failure was highlighted by the Paris Criminal Court in October 2017 in the case of Mr. Obiang, Vice-President of Equatorial Guinea who was found guilty of money laundering, misappropriation of public funds and breach of trust[v] as well as by several NGOs, including Transparency International France, which has established recommendations for a responsible return of assets derived from corruption[vi].

After several unsuccessful attempts[vii], a new bill entitled “programming bill for solidarity development and fight against global inequalities” was submitted in December 2020, to create a mechanism for restitution to local populations[viii].

The bill establishes a principle of restitution to local population of the revenue derived from the sale of property confiscated following a final conviction[ix]. This conviction must relate to money laundering or concealment of a list of designated offences, e., breach of trust, offenses relating to breaches of the duty of probity (except for the offense of concussion), active bribery and influence peddling by individuals, the removal and misappropriation of goods contained in a public depository, passive and active corruption and influence peddling or the infringement of legal proceedings and obstruction of justice[x].

The original offence must have been committed by a person who is a public official of a foreign State, who holds a public office in a foreign State, or who performs a public service in a foreign State, in the exercise of his or her functions[xi].

It should be noted that the scope of this new project was envisaged by the drafters on the basis of emblematic cases of ill-gotten goods identified by the Ministry of Justice[xii] and in particular the aforementioned Obiang case involving the embezzlement of 150 million euros, which led to numerous confiscations in France[xiii] and for which the International Court of Justice in a decision rendered on December 10, 2020 accepted that the seizure by France of Mr. Obiang’s illicit assets was not contrary to the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961[xiv] and that Mr. Obiang could not benefit from the principle of immunity of the offices of a diplomatic mission regarding these seized goods [xv].

Concerning the implementation modalities, the provisions of the draft specify that these sums give rise to the opening of budgetary credits within the « Official Development Assistance » mission, placed under the responsibility of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs[xvi]. The creation of a new budget program falls within the exclusive domain of the finance laws[xvii]. Therefore, a new provision will be inserted in the forthcoming 2022 Finance Act to track appropriations according to the principles of transparency, accountability and association of representative organizations as defined by Transparency International[xviii].

It should be noted that the accelerated legislative procedure was initiated by the government in order to allow for a rapid application to ongoing cases[xix]. The draft was unanimously adopted by the French National Assembly on 2 March 2021 and by the Senate on 17 May 2021[xx] . On June 24, 2021, deputies and senators, meeting in joint committee, found a compromise text. The promulgation of the text should therefore be finished shortly[xxi].

Contenu similaire

Revue de presse
24 novembre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 20 novembre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse revient sur les procédures judiciaires ouvertes à l’encontre du sénateur Joël Guerriau, de l’ancien...
Revue de presse
revue de presse Navacelle
17 novembre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 13 novembre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse revient sur les procédures judiciaires ouvertes à l’encontre de Bachar Al-Assad, dirigeant de la...
Revue de presse
10 novembre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 6 novembre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse revient sur les procès ouverts à l’encontre, respectivement, de l’ancien patron adjoint de la...
Publication
GIR Guide to Sanctions - Navacelle 2023
8 novembre 2023
Le guide des sanctions (2023) – GIR (en anglais)
Navacelle co-auteur de la quatrième édition du guide des sanctions publiées par Global Investigations Review (GIR).
Revue de presse
Revue de presse - Semaine du 30 octobre 2023
3 novembre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 30 octobre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse Navacelle revient sur la constitution de partie civile d’Altice dans la procédure pénale au...
Revue de presse
27 octobre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 23 octobre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse revient sur la saisie de près de 60 millions d’euros par la justice française...
Revue de presse
20 octobre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 16 octobre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse revient sur la décision de la CEDH relative à la condamnation des sociétés Total...
Revue de presse
13 octobre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 9 octobre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse Navacelle revient sur la condamnation en appel du maire de Sète ainsi que sur...
Actualité
6 octobre 2023
La saisine pénale d’un bien immobilier fait-elle obstacle à la prise d’une sûreté judicaire ?...
Navacelle s'est prêté à l’exercice – à savoir, évaluer la possibilité de procéder à une sûreté judiciaire sur un bien...
Revue de presse
Revue de presse
6 octobre 2023
Revue de presse – Semaine du 2 octobre 2023
Cette semaine, la revue de presse Navacelle revient sur la perquisition du domicile de l’ancien maire de Saint-Jory dans le...
Actualité
Conseil Constitutionnel
5 octobre 2023
Saga Fillon : Victoire procédurale devant le Conseil constitutionnel pour l’ex-premier ministre dans l’affaire des...
Saisi d’une question prioritaire de constitutionnalité, le Conseil constitutionnel a abrogé partiellement une disposition du code de procédure pénale qui...
Analyse
Bercy
3 octobre 2023
Précisions sur le cadre procédural des dénonciations automatiques réalisées par l’administration fiscale...
Le 13 septembre 2023, les juges du quai de l’Horloge ont fait une application stricte de l’article L.228 I du...