Analyse
14 juillet 2017

Droit du devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des sociétés contractantes (En anglais)

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Contenu similaire

Publication
8 juillet 2025
Bastille Day newsletter 2025
Pour le 14 juillet, l’équipe Navacelle vous propose, comme chaque année, un aperçu des événements marquants survenus en France au...
Analyse
19 mai 2025
CJIP Paprec : retour sur la répression pénale en cas de violation des règles d’attribution...
Le 10 février 2025, Paprec a signé une Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public (CJIP) afin de mettre fin aux poursuites à...
Revue de presse
26 septembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 22 septembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur l’accord conclu par UBS mettant fin à un long contentieux fiscal en...
Analyse
22 septembre 2025
CJIP Surys : une amende, une peine de mise en conformité et une indemnisation de...
Le 8 juillet 2025, la société SAS Surys a signé une convention judiciaire d’intérêt public pour des faits de corruption...
Revue de presse
19 septembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 15 septembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur le démantèlement de la plateforme du darknet “DFAS”, qui a conduit à...
Revue de presse
12 septembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 8 septembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur la décision de la Cour de cassation demandant à la cour d’appel...
Revue de presse
5 septembre 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 1er septembre 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur l’émission par la justice française de sept mandats d’arrêt visant Bachar Al-Assad...
Revue de presse
29 août 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 25 août 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur l'annonce de l'arrestation de plus de 1 200 cybercriminels dans le cadre...
Événement
28 août 2025
Formation EFB : L’enquête interne (Édition 2025-2026)
Quand et comment mener une enquête interne ? Dans quel contexte ? Quel est le rôle de l’avocat ? Et...
Revue de presse
22 août 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 18 août 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur l’ouverture d’une enquête pour corruption par le ministère de la justice américain...
Revue de presse
14 août 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 11 août 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur une QPC jugée le 8 août concernant une décision de la CNIL,...
Actualité
11 août 2025
Global Arbitration Review met en lumière le développement en arbitrage de Navacelle
Le développement de Navacelle dans le domaine de l'arbitrage franchit une nouvelle étape.
Revue de presse
8 août 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 4 août 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur la suite de l’information judiciaire concernant les allégations de corruptions et de...
Revue de presse
Revue de presse
1 août 2025
Revue de presse – Semaine du 28 juillet 2025
La revue de presse revient cette semaine sur le contentieux opposant le groupe Bolloré à l’AMF concernant Vivendi, l’annulation du...