Analysis
16 April 2024

The AFA’s new practical guide to corporate sponsorship operations

On 26 March 2024, the French Anti-Corruption Agency (“AFA”) published its new practical guide to securing patronage and sponsorship operations.

 

In a context of increase of sponsorship and patronage operations, enabling public or private companies to support numerous causes, particularly social, sporting and scientific, the AFA published a definitive version of its practical guide in this area on 26 March 2024.[1]

This guide is not binding and does not create any legal obligation for companies.[2] However, its content must be apprehended by implementing a risk-based approach, in order to be adapted to the risk profile of each company according to its business sector, organization, geographical location and size, pursuant to the principle of proportionality on which AFA’s recommendations are based.[3]

The purpose of the guide is to describe the situations and risk factors of probity breaches that companies may face (I) and to propose preventive, detection and remediation measures that companies can put in place to address them (II).

 

I. The AFA’s guide describes the situations and risk factors of probity breaches that companies may face when engaging in sponsorship and patronage operations

 

Companies may sponsor an event, a legal or natural person, or a product by means of monetary payments or through provision of material or human resources, subject to compliance with certain legislation. These operations must, where applicable, comply with certain legal and regulatory frames and restrictions, particularly with regard to tobacco and alcohol, the advertising of health products and the promotion of certain financial services.[4]

Sponsorship and patronage operations, which allow companies to obtain a direct or indirect benefit while providing support for a project or organization of public interest, may constitute risk factors for probity breaches.[5] The guide describes the risks of probity breaches when patronage and sponsorship operations are undertaken, for example the concealment of an offence such as corruption, influence peddling, illegal interest-taking and favoritism, as well as the misappropriation of the sponsorship. By doing so, the guide highlights the criminal risk that companies may face.[6]

The AFA guide specifies that potential bribery schemes may occur when members of a beneficiary organization, often working on a voluntary basis, also hold positions in administrations or companies from which the briber would like to obtain a favorable decision.[7] For example, a supplier who offers to supply a company with raw materials at reduced prices if it agrees, in return, to sponsor a sports association of which it is a member, could be prosecuted for active and passive private corruption.[8]

The guide also describes the numerous risk factors associated with sponsorship and patronage operations. These may be linked to the beneficiaries of the operations (their geographical location, the presence of public stakeholders, the absence of means for detecting probity breaches),[9] to the operations themselves (particularly with regard to their public exposure, the competitive environment or the urgency of the operation),[10] or to their process (for example, when the decision-making procedure for a sponsorship or patronage operation is not subject to any particular process within the beneficiary).[11]

 

II.   The AFA’s guide lists various prevention, detection and remediation measures for addressing the risks associated with sponsorship and patronage operations

 

On the one hand, preventive measures listed by the AFA include strengthening governance and top management role (notably by appointing a manager, setting up a dedicated committee, and establishing an internal procedure for assessing projects),[12] integrating the risk of probity breaches in sponsorship and patronage operations into the risk mapping process, as well as into the code of conduct and related policies, providing training to the staff involved in this type of operation and, lastly, evaluating the beneficiary organizations with regard to the risks of probity breaches.[13]

On the other hand, the detection and remediation measures listed by the AFA are the accessibility of the internal whistleblowing system to organizations benefiting from sponsorship and patronage, anti-corruption accounting controls, internal control and internal audit of the sponsorship and patronage system and remediation and continuous improvement through periodic reassessment of these operations’ rationale.[14]

In addition, the guide includes three supplementary appendices setting out the tax regimes for sponsorship and patronage and a list of key points for sponsorship and patronage policies and procedures.[15] In this respect, the AFA advises companies to mention, for example, the interest of the sponsorship for the company or the public-interest nature of a patronage.[16] Moreover, the AFA advises companies to mention in their sponsorship and patronage procedures the persons involved by such operations and the nature of the authorized operations.[17]

Related content

Press review
Press review - Week of 23 September 2024
27 September 2024
Press review – Week of 23 September 2024
This week’s press review covers the follow-up to the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (“CJIP”) with Nestlé, and notably the two...
Event
4 September 2024
From checklists to handcuffs: the compliance side of sanctions and its slip-ups
A roundtable held during the AIJA - International Association of Young Lawyers Annual Congress 2024 in Madrid, with Una Paunovic,...
Press review
30 August 2024
Press review – Week of 26 August 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the Anticor association’s latest requête en référé before the Paris Administrative Court following the...
Publication
29 August 2024
LIR 7th Edition : Focus on third-party evaluation, a challenging due diligence measure for French companies
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' seventh edition, focusing on third-party evaluation, a challenging due diligence measure for French...
Event
7 August 2024
Professional training course on internal investigations – Paris Bar School (2nd edition)
When and how to conduct an internal investigation? In what context? What is your role as a lawyer? What about...
Press review
2 August 2024
Press review – Week of 29 July 2024
This week’s press review focuses on France’s closure of public access to the register of beneficial owners in France, on...
Press review
19 July 2024
Press review – Week of 15 July 2024
This week’s press review looks at the European Commission’s complaint against the social network X (formerly Twitter) for misleading its...
Publication
14 July 2024
Overview of 2024: Ethics & compliance
Overview of decisions and events relating to ethics and compliance which have occurred in France over the last twelve months.
Press review
28 June 2024
Press review – Week of 24 June 2024
This week, the press review covers the conviction of Jean-Paul Huchon for illegal taking of interests, the case of Jean-Christophe...
Press review
21 June 2024
Press review – Week of 17 June 2024
This week, the press review covers the admissibility of the actions against Total and EDF relating to breaches of the...
Event
19 June 2024
Compliance and forensic investigations: optimising how companies, lawyers and forensic professionals work together
Grant Thornton France invited Stéphane de Navacelle to take part in a panel with Jean-Marie Pivard (Publicis Groupe), Jennifer Fiddian-Green...
2 min
Event
19 June 2024
Discussion on harassment prevention and exposure
Invited by Colas Rail, Stéphane de Navacelle discussed with 100+ group top managers during their Management Committee 2024, on 19 June 2024.
2 min