Analysis
15 March 2023

US FinCEN issues new rule on beneficial ownership reporting under the Corporate Transparency Act

As of January 1, 2024, companies operating in the United States will be required to report information about their beneficial owners to FinCEN (the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network).

 

On 29 September 2022, the US Treasury Department announced the publication of a new Beneficial Ownership Information rule. Most companies and entities formed or registered to do business in the United States will be required to report information to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) on the beneficiary who owns or controls them.

The purpose of this rule is to strengthen national security by preventing natural and legal persons engaged in illegal activities from hiding behind shell companies and thus taking advantage of the financial system to launder money and hide illegal proceeds.[1] This initiative is similar to the system introduced in France by Order No 2020-115 of 12 February 2020 on “beneficial owners’ information”.

 

I. The rule on beneficial ownership information is considered necessary for greater transparency in the financial system

The purpose of collecting beneficial ownership information on business entities operating in the United States is primarily to prevent the corporate veil from being used for illicit purposes, including financial crimes. According to the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury Department, information on the beneficial owners of such entities would help “crack down on criminals, corrupt individuals, and other nefarious actors seeking to take advantage of the U.S. financial system for illicit purposes” [2], targeting many of the crimes that can be facilitated by the anonymity of beneficial owners, such as money laundering, concealment of illicit wealth and assets, transfer of money related to drug and human trafficking, as well as serious tax fraud adversely affecting U.S. citizens.

This FinCEN rule implements Section 6403 of the Corporate Transparency Act. This law was passed on January 1, 2021, following the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020, and the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021.[3] Its objective was to prevent the exploitation of US companies for illegal purposes and to assist law enforcement in preventing misconduct involving these companies.

FinCEN also pointed out that recent geopolitical events have demonstrated the importance and necessity of such information, as sanctions imposed on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine have, in some cases, been circumvented through the use of US companies owned by Russian nationals.[4]

 

II. The rule on the identification of beneficial owners applies to a large number of companies and requires various disclosures

When publishing the rule, however, FinCEN clarified that reporting requirements for companies would be tailored to their size.[5]

The FinCEN rule applies to most entities (new and existing) operating in the US, whether domestic or foreign. These “reporting companies” include[6] :

  • US corporations (all except 23 statutory exemptions)
  • Limited liability companies
  • Any entity created by filing a document with a Secretary of State or similar office under the law of a State or Indian tribe
  • Any foreign entity registered to do business in a State or tribal jurisdiction by filing a document with a Secretary of State or similar office

Each reporting company must provide FinCEN with the beneficial owner information report, which includes several administrative elements to identify beneficial owners, including the names, dates of birth, addresses, ID numbers, etc. of the persons controlling the company or those responsible for its registration.

This rule will come into force on 1 January 2024. Reporting companies that were created before this will have one year to file their initial report, and those created subsequently will have 30 days to do so from the notification of creation. Any changes in ownership or correction of erroneous information will have to be made within 30 days.

In particular, the following shall be considered as beneficial owners: (i) persons who hold at least 25% of the company’s capital; (ii) persons who exercise substantial control and take important decisions; and (iii) persons responsible for the reporting company’s registration.

The US Treasury Department further clarified in a December 2022 memorandum that beneficial owner information may be disclosed to, among others: (i) federal, state or local government agencies; (ii) foreign prosecutorial or judicial authorities; (iii) financial institutions; (iv) some supervisory authorities; and (v) the US Treasury Department.[7]

 

III. The rule on beneficial ownership information is close to the French rule on the beneficial owners register

The United States is a founding member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), which already recommended in 2012 the issuance of standards on beneficial owner transparency, namely the “International Standards on Combating Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Proliferation“.[8]

Moreover, a very similar rule was introduced in France by the Sapin II law in 2016, which is now included into the Monetary and Financial Code[9], which requires French and foreign companies to declare beneficial owners to the Trade and Companies Register (RCS).

However, there are some differences between the two regimes, the main one being that the French beneficial owners register is freely accessible to the public online.[10]

In a judgment delivered on 22 November 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that public access to information on beneficial owners constituted “a serious interference with fundamental rights to privacy and data protection” based on Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.[11]

Despite this high-profile decision, the Minister for the Economy, Finance and Industrial and Digital Sovereignty decided to maintain public access to the data contained within the beneficial owners register while waiting to draw all the consequences from the CJEU’s decision, stressing that “the publicity and free access to the beneficial owners register has been guaranteed in the framework of the fifth European directive transposition regarding the fight against money laundering and terrorism financing“.[12]

 

Related content

Event
27 January 2025
The internationalisation of whistleblowing: ensuring compliance within a global framework
A webinar organised by EQS on 28 January 2025 built for international compliance actors.
Analysis
6 January 2025
A look back at the last CJIP of 2024: Areva SA and Orano Mining SAS
On 9 December 2024, the Paris Judicial Court approved the CJIP (French DPA) concluded between Areva SA and Orano Mining...
Analysis
23 December 2024
Lessons from the analysis of first-instance court decisions on probity offenses by the French Anti-Corruption...
The French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) published an analytical note on 9 December 2024, regarding the prosecution of probity offenses, based...
Press review
13 December 2024
Press review – Week of 9 December 2024
This week’s press review covers the CJIP (DPA) concluded by Areva and Orano Mining for acts of corruption in Mongolia,...
Press review
22 November 2024
Press review – Week of 18 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the dismantling of a VAT fraud network in Europe, the opening of an investigation into...
Press review
15 November 2024
Press review – Week of 11 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the conviction of Marco Mouly for organizing his insolvency and the issue of an arrest...
Press review
8 November 2024
Press review – Week of 4 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the searches conducted in Paris and Amsterdam as part of the tax fraud allegations against...
Press review
1 November 2024
Press review – Week of 28 October 2024
This week’s press review covers BNP Paribas’ conviction to compensate a fake bank advisor fraud victim, ESMA’s report positioning the...
Analysis
20 September 2024
Look back at the CJIP concluded between Danske Bank and the French National financial prosecutor’s...
Danske Bank was charged with tax fraud laundering which occurred between 2007 and 2014 due to the lack of effectiveness...
Press review
20 September 2024
Press review – Week of 16 September 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the new obligation to relinquish seized assets in CJIP introduced by Law 2024-582, the...
Press review
13 September 2024
Press review – Week of 9 September 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the trial of eight members of the military for corruption and favoritism before the...
Press review
30 August 2024
Press review – Week of 26 August 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the Anticor association’s latest requête en référé before the Paris Administrative Court following the...