Analysis
4 November 2021

U.S. announces tougher approach of the Department of Justice in the fight against economic crime

Navacelle team highlights the review of the U.S. Department of Justice's (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime.

 

On 28 October 2021, during a speech at the 36th National Institute on White Collar Crime organized by the American Bar Association, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a significant review of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime. Aside from emphasizing the importance of compliance programs[1], four key points are to be taken away from the series of measures announced.

 

I. A global approach towards the background of a company under investigation

Prosecutors must now take a “holistic approach” when assessing the appropriate response to an investigation involving a company. They must therefore consider any previous reprehensible misconduct attributable to it, without limiting its examination to past misconduct similar to the alleged offence.

To this end, prosecutors are invited to consider all misconducts committed by the company and discovered during any previous enforcement action, whether national or foreign, criminal, civil or regulatory conducted against it or, where applicable, against its parent company, divisions, affiliates, subsidiaries and any other group entities.[2]

 

II. A return to the “Yates Memo” standard regarding the liability of natural persons

These new measures also mark the return to the “Yates memo” standard, which required, in order to benefit from a cooperation credit, that companies provide the DoJ with all relevant elements (except privileged information) relating to the individuals involved in the alleged company’s misconduct.

The company must therefore identify all persons involved or responsible for the alleged misconduct, regardless of their position, status or seniority, whether internal or external to the company.[3]

 

III. Use of monitorship as much as necessary

The use of an independent monitor will be put in place as much as it may be necessary to ensure that the company complies to the commitments made. Thus, prosecutors will have to give priority to the appointment of an independent monitor when a company’s compliance program and controls have not been tested, have been proven ineffective, or when they are inadequately resourced or not fully implemented at the time of the agreement.[4]

 

IV. The creation of the Corporate Crime Advisory Group to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime

This working group will be responsible for the review of the DOJ’s approach to the prosecution of unlawful conduct by companies and their managers, executives and employees in order to make any recommendations and propose any appropriate policy revisions.

It will examine various topics such as cooperation credits, recidivism and factors for determining whether a case should be resolved via a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) or a plea agreement.

In addition, this working group will also consider how the DOJ can invest in new technologies such as artificial intelligence to help investigators when dealing with large amounts of data, but also how to best utilize the department’s various resources to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime.[5]

 

The speech of Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco can be found here and her memorandum here, for more details.

Related content

Press review
25 July 2024
Press review – Week of 22 July 2024
This week’s press review looks at the international arrest warrant of the environmental activist Paul Watson, the police custody of...
Press review
19 July 2024
Press review – Week of 15 July 2024
This week’s press review looks at the European Commission’s complaint against the social network X (formerly Twitter) for misleading its...
Publication
14 July 2024
Overview of 2024: White collar crime
Panorama of decisions and events relating to white collar crime which have occurred in France over the last twelve months.
Publication
Judicial public interest agreements (CJIP)
14 July 2024
CJIP Observatory : Key to understand French DPA
Since its creation by the Sapin II law of 9 December 2016, the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (“Convention Judiciaire d’Intérêt...
Press review
12 July 2024
Press review – Week of 8 July 2024
This week, the press review covers the confirmed conviction of a French sawmill for illegally importing exotic wood from Brazil,...
Press review
5 July 2024
Press review – Week of 1 July 2024
This week, the press review covers the acquittal of 28 people implicated in the Panama Papers scandal, Turkey’s withdrawal and...
Press review
28 June 2024
Press review – Week of 24 June 2024
This week, the press review covers the conviction of Jean-Paul Huchon for illegal taking of interests, the case of Jean-Christophe...
Analysis
25 June 2024
Articulation of tax and criminal procedures: consequences of the corrective declaration on the obligation to...
In a ruling handed down on 23 May 2024, the Criminal Division of the Cour de Cassation (French Supreme Court),...
Press review
21 June 2024
Press review – Week of 17 June 2024
This week, the press review covers the admissibility of the actions against Total and EDF relating to breaches of the...
Event
19 June 2024
Compliance and forensic investigations: optimising how companies, lawyers and forensic professionals work together
Grant Thornton France invited Stéphane de Navacelle to take part in a panel with Jean-Marie Pivard (Publicis Groupe), Jennifer Fiddian-Green...
2 min
Event
19 June 2024
Discussion on harassment prevention and exposure
Invited by Colas Rail, Stéphane de Navacelle discussed with 100+ group top managers during their Management Committee 2024, on 19 June 2024.
2 min
Press review
14 June 2024
Press review – Week of 10 June 2024
This week, the press review covers three people being charged for fraud in the Hauts-de-Seine, the dismantling of an undeclared...