Analysis
4 November 2021

U.S. announces tougher approach of the Department of Justice in the fight against economic crime

Navacelle team highlights the review of the U.S. Department of Justice's (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime.

 

On 28 October 2021, during a speech at the 36th National Institute on White Collar Crime organized by the American Bar Association, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a significant review of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime. Aside from emphasizing the importance of compliance programs[1], four key points are to be taken away from the series of measures announced.

 

I. A global approach towards the background of a company under investigation

Prosecutors must now take a “holistic approach” when assessing the appropriate response to an investigation involving a company. They must therefore consider any previous reprehensible misconduct attributable to it, without limiting its examination to past misconduct similar to the alleged offence.

To this end, prosecutors are invited to consider all misconducts committed by the company and discovered during any previous enforcement action, whether national or foreign, criminal, civil or regulatory conducted against it or, where applicable, against its parent company, divisions, affiliates, subsidiaries and any other group entities.[2]

 

II. A return to the “Yates Memo” standard regarding the liability of natural persons

These new measures also mark the return to the “Yates memo” standard, which required, in order to benefit from a cooperation credit, that companies provide the DoJ with all relevant elements (except privileged information) relating to the individuals involved in the alleged company’s misconduct.

The company must therefore identify all persons involved or responsible for the alleged misconduct, regardless of their position, status or seniority, whether internal or external to the company.[3]

 

III. Use of monitorship as much as necessary

The use of an independent monitor will be put in place as much as it may be necessary to ensure that the company complies to the commitments made. Thus, prosecutors will have to give priority to the appointment of an independent monitor when a company’s compliance program and controls have not been tested, have been proven ineffective, or when they are inadequately resourced or not fully implemented at the time of the agreement.[4]

 

IV. The creation of the Corporate Crime Advisory Group to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime

This working group will be responsible for the review of the DOJ’s approach to the prosecution of unlawful conduct by companies and their managers, executives and employees in order to make any recommendations and propose any appropriate policy revisions.

It will examine various topics such as cooperation credits, recidivism and factors for determining whether a case should be resolved via a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) or a plea agreement.

In addition, this working group will also consider how the DOJ can invest in new technologies such as artificial intelligence to help investigators when dealing with large amounts of data, but also how to best utilize the department’s various resources to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime.[5]

 

The speech of Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco can be found here and her memorandum here, for more details.

Related content

Press review
26 April 2024
Press review – Week of 22 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the European Parliament’s adoption of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, the definitive conviction...
Press review
19 April 2024
Press review – Week of 15 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the publication of TRACFIN’s 2023 report on professionals’ suspicious transaction reports, the decision of...
Press review
12 April 2024
Press review – Week of 8 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the Panama Papers trial which opened on Monday, 8 April, the decision rendered against...
Press review
5 April 2024
Press review – Week of 1 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the conviction by the American justice system of the crypto assets platform FTX‘s former...
Press review
29 March 2024
Press review – Week of 25 March 2024
This week, the press review covers the opening of proceedings against Google, Apple and Meta by the European Commission for...
Press review
22 March 2024
Press review – Week of 18 March 2024
This week, the press review covers the report of the French Court of Auditors on the financial situation of the...
Press review
15 March 2024
Press review – Week of 11 March 2024
This week’s press review covers the implementation by the AMF of two guidelines issued by the European Banking Authority, the...
Press review
8 March 2024
Press review – Week of 4 March 2024
This week’s press review covers the conviction of Apple to a 1.8 billion euros fine by the European Commission for...
Press review
1 March 2024
Press review – Week of 26 February 2024
This week’s press review covers Washington's adoption of new sanctions against Russia, the involvement of a French municipal agent in...
Press review
23 February 2024
Press review – Week of 19 February 2024
This week’s press review covers Donald Trump and his sons’ conviction for fraud in New York, the decision of Paris...
Analysis
22 February 2024
New clarifications on the repression of tax fraud offences and tax fraud laundering by the...
On 13 December 2023, the Cour de cassation first ruled on the concept of non bis in idem, rejecting the...
Analysis
20 February 2024
A French dairy group suspected of tax fraud
Since 2018, Lactalis has been suspected of committing tax fraud and laundering the proceeds of such fraud via schemes involving...