5 September 2022

International Legal Developments 2021 in Review – American Bar Association

Navacelle co-author of the 2021 annual review of international legal developments of the American Bar Association International Law Section (ABA).


Chapter: Dispute Resolution


International Criminal Law, International Courts, and Judicial Affairs


Manish N. Bhatt, Giovanni Chiarini, Katherine Maddox Davis, Beth Farmer, Timothy Franklin, Cyreka C. Jacobs, Stéphane de Navacelle, Sara L. Ochs, Alexander S. Vesselinovitch, Melissa Ginsberg, Marc Weitz and Julie Zorrilla.

This article reviews some of the most significant developments in 2021 made by international courts and tribunals, domestic courts, and legislative developments involving issues of international criminal law, international human rights law, and international public law. This article also includes a section on protecting the attorney-client and work product privileges in internal investigations, which offers practical application for lawyers engaged in cross-border civil litigation and investigations





National Courts

A.  Developments in French criminal law 

This section discusses important recent developments in the field of white-collar enforcement in France. Three developments stand out. First, the goal of aligning the French anti-corruption framework with the best European and international standards led to an evaluation of the Sapin II law by French Members of Parliament, five years after its enactment.[193] The Report, published on July 7, 2021, proposes several ways to improve the legal framework.[194] Second, a new offense of ecocide has strengthened the protection of the environment.[195] Finally, the French Supreme Court issued a landmark decision on corporate criminal responsibility for crimes against humanity.[196]


1. Improving France’s Anti-Corruption Framework

On July 7, 2021, French Members of Parliament, Raphaël Gauvain and Olivier Marleix, published a Report evaluating the Sapin II Law.[197] While their overall review was positive, they recommended fifty amendments to improve it.[198] The Report notes that the French Anti- Corruption Agency (AFA) fulfilled its mission of control and sanction, but to the detriment of its coordination mission.[199] The Report thus suggests a special committee for the fight against corruption, and the redirection of the AFA’s focus to administrative coordination.[200]

The AFA’s control and sanctions missions would then be transferred to the already existing High Authority for the Transparency of Public Life (HATVP).[201]

The Report also focuses on ways to encourage the use of the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (CJIP) by granting more safeguards to those involved and improving the status of whistleblowers as difficulties persist both in the quality of their treatment and in their protection against retaliation.[202] The Report will form the basis of a draft bill to be submitted to the National Assembly in November 2021.[203]


2. The New Ecocide Offense

The Climate and Resilience Act was enacted on August 22, 2021.[204] It strengthens the enforcement of environmental crimes, notably by introducing the ecocide offense,[205] which reinforces the risk for companies that pollute.

The Climate and Resilience Act defines ecocide as aggravating the general offense of environmental pollution when the acts are deliberately committed, i.e., when the offense of air and water pollution[206] or soil pollution[207]of the environmental code, was not accidental but intentional.[208] It is punishable by ten years’ imprisonment and a fine of 4.5 million euros or of an amount corresponding to ten times the benefit derived from the commission of the offense.[209]


3. The Lafarge Case

In the Lafarge, a French company, was indicted for involvement in alleged offenses committed by its Syrian subsidiary, in connection with payments made to the so-called Islamic State and other armed groups in Syria between 2012 and 2014.[210] The issue before the French Supreme Court (Cour de Cassation) was the legal validity of this indictment.[211]

On September 7, 2021, the Cour de Cassation held that “one can be an accomplice to crimes against humanity even though there is no intention of associating oneself with the commission of these crimes.”[212] The Court held that it is sufficient to have had knowledge of the preparation or commission of these acts and to have facilitated them through aid or assistance.[213] There is no requirement that the actor be part of the criminal organization or have participated in the conception or execution of the criminal plan[214] In the Lafarge case, the defendant’s informed payment of several millions of dollars to an organization whose purpose was to commit crimes against humanity was found sufficient to constitute complicity.[215]

In addition, the Court clarified the rules on the admissibility of NGOs in cases concerning crimes against humanity and terrorism financing.[216]It held that only the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) was admissible as a civil party with respect to the offense of complicity in crimes against humanity, because ECCHR was the only association that included such purposes when it was created.[217] By contrast, the Court found that that none of the NGOs were admissible as a civil party for the offense of financing of terrorism because the facts alleged were not likely to have caused direct damage to any members of the NGOs.[218] Finally, the Supreme Court confirmed Lafarge’s indictment for the financing of terrorism.[219]


Related content

DPA ABA 2023
26 April 2023
Deferred Prosecution Agreements and how much do they shield from litigation and arbitration?
During the American Bar Association International Law Section 2023 conference, Stéphane de Navacelle will discuss Corporate criminal liability frameworks which...
Guide to Corporate Internal Investigations
21 April 2023
Guide to Corporate Internal Investigations by the American Bar Association
Julie Zorrilla and Stéphane de Navacelle contribute to the International Guide to Corporate Internal Investigations by the American Bar Association....
Press review
10 April 2023
Press review – Week of 3 April 2023
This week's press review focuses on the publication by the CNIL of the 2023 edition of its guide on the...
15 March 2023
US FinCEN issues new rule on beneficial ownership reporting under the Corporate Transparency Act
As of January 1, 2024, companies operating in the United States will be required to report information about their beneficial...
Press review
Press review - Week of 27 February 2023
2 March 2023
Press review – Week of 27 February 2023
This week in the press review, the Minister of Public Accounts visited the United States to discuss improving tax cooperation....
2 February 2023
ICC Mexico – Sapin II and France’s efforts to tackle corruption
Stéphane de Navacelle was invited by the ICC of México to talk about the Sapin II law and France's efforts...
25 January 2023
Overview of the AFA’s survey regarding French companies’ anti-corruption systems
On 30 September 2022, the French Anti-Corruption Agency published the results of its second survey of French companies’ anti-corruption systems....
6 December 2022
Launch of the international guide to corporate internal invgestigations
NAVACELLE co-hosted the launch of the ABA guide in Dubai along with Al Tamimi & Company, Bär & Karrer and...
Press review
Week of 7 November 2022
14 November 2022
Press review – Week of 7 November 2022
In this press review, you will find clarifications from the Court of Cassation on the legality of an extradition of...
9 November 2022
Webinar: A comparative approach to professional secrecy and attorney-client privilege in criminal proceedings
Stéphane de Navacelle spoke at the Mondaq and Monfrini Bitton Klein webinar on "professional secrecy and attorney-client privilege in criminal...
Press review
Week of 31 October 2022
4 November 2022
Press review – Week of 31 October 2022
In this press review, you will find details on the new methods adopted by the French national anti-terrorist prosecutor's office...
25 October 2022
AFA’s national diagnosis survey of anti-corruption systems in businesses
On 30 September 2022, the AFA published its second national diagnosis survey of anti-corruption systems in businesses. It shows a...