Publication
13 November 2023

Internal Investigation and Negotiated Justice

Can internal investigation be used to negotiate the investigation phase with prosecuting authorities? An article, by Guillaume Daïeff, Stéphane de Navacelle and Julie Zorrilla.

The Sapin II Law of 9 December 2016 created the possibility for accused entities to enter into negotiation with prosecuting authorities in the context of criminal investigations by introducing a new alternative to prosecution mechanism at article 41-1-2 of the criminal procedure code: the convention judiciaire d’intérêt public (CJIP) (judicial agreement of public interest).

Since then, the public prosecutor may, as long as the public prosecution has not been initiated, suggest the conclusion of such an agreement to a legal person accused of certain felonies related to integrity breaches, tax fraud and tax fraud laundering, as well as offences related to those felonies and felonies defined in the environmental code.

When a judicial investigation has been opened, the juge d’instruction (investigating judge) on the case may as well, upon request or with the agreement of the public prosecutor, refer the procedure to the latter in order to conclude a CJIP.

This “third way”, where the prosecution and accusation leave room for negotiation, has often been compared to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), an American and then British criminal transactional procedure which “consists, for the prosecuting authorities (notably the Department of Justice, DOJ), in initiating the public prosecution and then requesting the court to suspend it immediately, considering the commitments taken by the accused company under the terms of the agreement”. It is true that similarly to the DPA, the CJIP mechanism involves not only the demonstration of an improvement or a desire to improve its compliance program, but also the recognition of the facts giving rise to the procedure, the payment of an often significant public interest fine and, if necessary, the implementation of a monitoring by the Agence française anticorruption (AFA) (French anticorruption agency), as well as the cooperation of the legal person to the investigations carried out by the prosecution.

This similarity is all the more remarkable as, apart from the resemblance of the mechanism, the practices implemented by attorneys of legal persons in the context of their mission of assistance and criminal defense in the US have also spread to France. Practices of criminal attorneys and public prosecutors have evolved for certain cases, moving from a resisting or even breakaway criminal defense to a full cooperation, and from a full investigation carried out by judicial investigators under the public prosecutor authority to an internal investigation.

Related content

Press review
19 April 2024
Press review – Week of 15 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the publication of TRACFIN’s 2023 report on professionals’ suspicious transaction reports, the decision of...
Analysis
16 April 2024
Overview of the “anti-gift” procedure applicable to actors operating in the health sector in the...
The “anti-gift” procedure provided by the French public health code prohibits actors operating in the health sector, except for some...
Press review
12 April 2024
Press review – Week of 8 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the Panama Papers trial which opened on Monday, 8 April, the decision rendered against...
Press review
29 March 2024
Press review – Week of 25 March 2024
This week, the press review covers the opening of proceedings against Google, Apple and Meta by the European Commission for...
Press review
22 March 2024
Press review – Week of 18 March 2024
This week, the press review covers the report of the French Court of Auditors on the financial situation of the...
Press review
15 March 2024
Press review – Week of 11 March 2024
This week’s press review covers the implementation by the AMF of two guidelines issued by the European Banking Authority, the...
News
11 March 2024
Webinar: The role of the investigating lawyer (in French)
Stéphane de Navacelle and Julie Zorrilla discussed the role of the investigating lawyer during the Paris Bar's Entrepreneurial Bar training...
Press review
8 March 2024
Press review – Week of 4 March 2024
This week’s press review covers the conviction of Apple to a 1.8 billion euros fine by the European Commission for...
Press review
1 March 2024
Press review – Week of 26 February 2024
This week’s press review covers Washington's adoption of new sanctions against Russia, the involvement of a French municipal agent in...
Publication
27 February 2024
New sustainability reporting obligations in France: what’s new?
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' fifth edition about the transposition of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) in...
Press review
9 February 2024
Press review – Week of 5 February 2024
This week’s press review highlights the acquittal of former minister and mayor of Pau, François Bayrou, the accusation of a...
Press review
2 February 2024
Press review – Week of 29 January 2024
This week’s press review highlights the Transparency report on France's global position in the fight against corruption, Uber's fine in...