Publication
13 November 2023

Internal Investigation and Negotiated Justice

Can internal investigation be used to negotiate the investigation phase with prosecuting authorities? An article, by Guillaume Daïeff, Stéphane de Navacelle and Julie Zorrilla.

The Sapin II Law of 9 December 2016 created the possibility for accused entities to enter into negotiation with prosecuting authorities in the context of criminal investigations by introducing a new alternative to prosecution mechanism at article 41-1-2 of the criminal procedure code: the convention judiciaire d’intérêt public (CJIP) (judicial agreement of public interest).

Since then, the public prosecutor may, as long as the public prosecution has not been initiated, suggest the conclusion of such an agreement to a legal person accused of certain felonies related to integrity breaches, tax fraud and tax fraud laundering, as well as offences related to those felonies and felonies defined in the environmental code.

When a judicial investigation has been opened, the juge d’instruction (investigating judge) on the case may as well, upon request or with the agreement of the public prosecutor, refer the procedure to the latter in order to conclude a CJIP.

This “third way”, where the prosecution and accusation leave room for negotiation, has often been compared to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA), an American and then British criminal transactional procedure which “consists, for the prosecuting authorities (notably the Department of Justice, DOJ), in initiating the public prosecution and then requesting the court to suspend it immediately, considering the commitments taken by the accused company under the terms of the agreement”. It is true that similarly to the DPA, the CJIP mechanism involves not only the demonstration of an improvement or a desire to improve its compliance program, but also the recognition of the facts giving rise to the procedure, the payment of an often significant public interest fine and, if necessary, the implementation of a monitoring by the Agence française anticorruption (AFA) (French anticorruption agency), as well as the cooperation of the legal person to the investigations carried out by the prosecution.

This similarity is all the more remarkable as, apart from the resemblance of the mechanism, the practices implemented by attorneys of legal persons in the context of their mission of assistance and criminal defense in the US have also spread to France. Practices of criminal attorneys and public prosecutors have evolved for certain cases, moving from a resisting or even breakaway criminal defense to a full cooperation, and from a full investigation carried out by judicial investigators under the public prosecutor authority to an internal investigation.

Related content

Publication
12 July 2024
Overview of 2024: Ethics & compliance
Overview of decisions and events relating to ethics and compliance which have occurred in France over the last twelve months.
Press review
28 June 2024
Press review – Week of 24 June 2024
This week, the press review covers the conviction of Jean-Paul Huchon for illegal taking of interests, the case of Jean-Christophe...
Press review
21 June 2024
Press review – Week of 17 June 2024
This week, the press review covers the admissibility of the actions against Total and EDF relating to breaches of the...
Event
19 June 2024
Compliance and forensic investigations: optimising how companies, lawyers and forensic professionals work together
Grant Thornton France invited Stéphane de Navacelle to take part in a panel with Jean-Marie Pivard (Publicis Groupe), Jennifer Fiddian-Green...
2 min
Event
19 June 2024
Discussion on harassment prevention and exposure
Invited by Colas Rail, Stéphane de Navacelle discussed with 100+ group top managers during their Management Committee 2024, on 19 June 2024.
2 min
Event
13 June 2024
Future prospects for International Anti-Corruption Court
A panel held during the 20th Annual IBA Anti-Corruption Conference hosted at the OECD in Paris.
Press review
7 June 2024
Press review – Week of 3 June 2024
This week, the press review covers the trial of several Île-de-France’s elected officials including concealment of misappropriation of corporate assets...
Event
5 June 2024
Update on Sanctions Litigation, Arbitration, and Enforcement – with EU, French and Swiss perspectives
A panel held on 5 June 2024 in Berlin, during the C5's European Forum on Global Economic Sanctions.
Event
3 June 2024
Internal investigations by lawyers: how to approach labor & criminal law issues?
An animated debate on benefits brought by investigating lawyers on criminal or labor law investigations, i.e. independence, secret protection, confidentiality...
1 min
Press review
31 May 2024
Press review – Week of 27 May 2024
This week, the press review covers the conviction of a French senator for illegal taking of interest, the adoption of...
Analysis
29 May 2024
The challenge of regulating generative artificial intelligence
On February 14, the French National Assembly's Law Commission published a report on the challenges posed by generative artificial intelligence...
Video
16 May 2024
Anticorruption initiatives in Latin America: Lessons from the last decade (webinar)
To contribute to the Latin America and Caribbean Weeks event, organised by the French Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs...