Publication
29 August 2024

LIR 7th Edition : Focus on third-party evaluation, a challenging due diligence measure for French companies

Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' seventh edition, focusing on third-party evaluation, a challenging due diligence measure for French companies . A few short news on compliance are also included in the original publication (see below).

 

The French “Sapin 2” law of 9 December 2016 has upended the anti-corruption practices of many French companies by requiring them to carry out an assessment of third parties to analyze their level of exposure to the risk of corruption before entering into a business relationship or when certain events arise. This assessment shall be based on a risk map drawn up by the company. This risk mapping shall consist of a regularly updated document designed to identify, analyze and prioritize the risks of exposure of the company to external solicitation for the purpose of corruption, depending, in particular, on the business units and geographical areas in which the company operates.[1]

To help companies implement their anti-corruption measures, the French Anti-Corruption Agency (“AFA”) issues numerous recommendations and carries out analyses of the behavior adopted on the market. In 2022, one of these surveys showed that 59% of the respondent companies considered that the evaluation of third parties was the most difficult measure in the anti-corruption system to implement.[2] In order to take these results into account, the AFA circulated a questionnaire in 2023 aimed at collecting best practices from companies in setting up a third-party assessment system, as well as any difficulties encountered to provide further details on its recommendations in a new publication.[3]

The responses show that 31.3% of respondents do not list all third parties involved in their activities, mainly due to difficulties in identifying them, their diversity and lack of resources in compliance teams.[4]

Regarding the data collected for the individual assessment of third parties, the questionnaire highlights the fact that companies collect much less information that could provide a basis for potential warnings, such as the history of incidents, professional references or the behavior of third parties. The quality of and access to information, the volume of information to be processed and the cost of due diligence are among the obstacles that prevent companies from carrying out their due diligence.[5]

The main factor considered to renew the assessment of a third party already onboarded is the duration of the contract, and particularly its renewal date. The level of risk as indicated by the initial assessment and changes in the situation of the third party come second and third respectively.[6]

In conclusion, although some pitfalls have been identified, the third-party valuation method proposed by the AFA in its 2020 recommendations appears to be familiar to companies and is not being challenged.

The survey also reveals several best practices to be implemented. For example, the establishment of two different procedures to handle stock (existing third parties) and flow (new third parties), the deletion of third parties after a period of inactivity, and the declaration of new or inactive third parties to the compliance department.[7]

Based on these results, the AFA has stated that many of the issues raised by companies will be the subject of more detailed recommendations in one of its new publications.[8]

Related content

Press review
7 February 2025
Press review – Week of 3 February 2025
This week’s press review covers offences against environment, especially the trial against Nestlé company, an investigation in Guinea on pollution...
Event
27 January 2025
The internationalisation of whistleblowing: ensuring compliance within a global framework
A webinar organised by EQS on 28 January 2025 built for international compliance actors.
Press review
24 January 2025
Press review – Week of 20 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the CNIL's publication of its 2025-2028 strategic plan, the ACPR’s intensification of its fight against...
Press review
17 January 2025
Press review – Week of 13 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the investigation launched against the current French Minister of Transport for misappropriation of public funds,...
Event
10 January 2025
Are companies accountable in court? Between legality and activism
A panel organized on 10 January 2025, during the AIJA 2025 Francophone Conference in Geneva.
Analysis
6 January 2025
A look back at the last CJIP of 2024: Areva SA and Orano Mining SAS
On 9 December 2024, the Paris Judicial Court approved the CJIP (French DPA) concluded between Areva SA and Orano Mining...
Analysis
23 December 2024
Lessons from the analysis of first-instance court decisions on probity offenses by the French Anti-Corruption...
The French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) published an analytical note on 9 December 2024, regarding the prosecution of probity offenses, based...
Press review
13 December 2024
Press review – Week of 9 December 2024
This week’s press review covers the CJIP (DPA) concluded by Areva and Orano Mining for acts of corruption in Mongolia,...
Press review
6 December 2024
Press review – Week of 2 December 2024
This week’s press review covers the suspicions of favoritism at Caisse des Dépôts, the fine of 2,2 million euros for...
Event
3 December 2024
Anticorruption – Global year in review
A panel held during the "Compliance year in review" conference of the Cercle de la Compliance on 3 December 2024.
Event
26 November 2024
[Colas Compliance Day] Compliance as a key factor for the success of the company
Colas hosted its annual Compliance Day on 26 Novembre 2024.
Event
15 November 2024
A corporate perspective on human rights and environnemental due diligence and sanctions
"From checklists to handcuffs", a round table organised as part of the American Bar Association International Law Section's Autumn Conference...