Analysis
16 April 2024

The AFA’s new practical guide to corporate sponsorship operations

On 26 March 2024, the French Anti-Corruption Agency (“AFA”) published its new practical guide to securing patronage and sponsorship operations.

 

In a context of increase of sponsorship and patronage operations, enabling public or private companies to support numerous causes, particularly social, sporting and scientific, the AFA published a definitive version of its practical guide in this area on 26 March 2024.[1]

This guide is not binding and does not create any legal obligation for companies.[2] However, its content must be apprehended by implementing a risk-based approach, in order to be adapted to the risk profile of each company according to its business sector, organization, geographical location and size, pursuant to the principle of proportionality on which AFA’s recommendations are based.[3]

The purpose of the guide is to describe the situations and risk factors of probity breaches that companies may face (I) and to propose preventive, detection and remediation measures that companies can put in place to address them (II).

 

I. The AFA’s guide describes the situations and risk factors of probity breaches that companies may face when engaging in sponsorship and patronage operations

 

Companies may sponsor an event, a legal or natural person, or a product by means of monetary payments or through provision of material or human resources, subject to compliance with certain legislation. These operations must, where applicable, comply with certain legal and regulatory frames and restrictions, particularly with regard to tobacco and alcohol, the advertising of health products and the promotion of certain financial services.[4]

Sponsorship and patronage operations, which allow companies to obtain a direct or indirect benefit while providing support for a project or organization of public interest, may constitute risk factors for probity breaches.[5] The guide describes the risks of probity breaches when patronage and sponsorship operations are undertaken, for example the concealment of an offence such as corruption, influence peddling, illegal interest-taking and favoritism, as well as the misappropriation of the sponsorship. By doing so, the guide highlights the criminal risk that companies may face.[6]

The AFA guide specifies that potential bribery schemes may occur when members of a beneficiary organization, often working on a voluntary basis, also hold positions in administrations or companies from which the briber would like to obtain a favorable decision.[7] For example, a supplier who offers to supply a company with raw materials at reduced prices if it agrees, in return, to sponsor a sports association of which it is a member, could be prosecuted for active and passive private corruption.[8]

The guide also describes the numerous risk factors associated with sponsorship and patronage operations. These may be linked to the beneficiaries of the operations (their geographical location, the presence of public stakeholders, the absence of means for detecting probity breaches),[9] to the operations themselves (particularly with regard to their public exposure, the competitive environment or the urgency of the operation),[10] or to their process (for example, when the decision-making procedure for a sponsorship or patronage operation is not subject to any particular process within the beneficiary).[11]

 

II.   The AFA’s guide lists various prevention, detection and remediation measures for addressing the risks associated with sponsorship and patronage operations

 

On the one hand, preventive measures listed by the AFA include strengthening governance and top management role (notably by appointing a manager, setting up a dedicated committee, and establishing an internal procedure for assessing projects),[12] integrating the risk of probity breaches in sponsorship and patronage operations into the risk mapping process, as well as into the code of conduct and related policies, providing training to the staff involved in this type of operation and, lastly, evaluating the beneficiary organizations with regard to the risks of probity breaches.[13]

On the other hand, the detection and remediation measures listed by the AFA are the accessibility of the internal whistleblowing system to organizations benefiting from sponsorship and patronage, anti-corruption accounting controls, internal control and internal audit of the sponsorship and patronage system and remediation and continuous improvement through periodic reassessment of these operations’ rationale.[14]

In addition, the guide includes three supplementary appendices setting out the tax regimes for sponsorship and patronage and a list of key points for sponsorship and patronage policies and procedures.[15] In this respect, the AFA advises companies to mention, for example, the interest of the sponsorship for the company or the public-interest nature of a patronage.[16] Moreover, the AFA advises companies to mention in their sponsorship and patronage procedures the persons involved by such operations and the nature of the authorized operations.[17]

Related content

Press review
19 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 15 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the submissions of the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office in the Lafarge trial concerning allegations of...
News
12 December 2025
Towards a French Legislative Framework for Internal Investigations
Following on from the report by the Club des juristes, co-authored by Raphaël Gauvain and Stéphane de Navacelle, the French...
Press review
12 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 8 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the risk of significant financial penalties facing several European states as a result of arbitration...
Press review
5 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 1 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the opening of the trial of seven individuals accused of attempted fraud and corruption targeting...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Event
2 December 2025
[Training course] Corporate compliance: fundamentals and best practices – Lamy Liaisons Academy
Vincent Filhol regularly provides training on corporate compliance for Lamy Liaison Academy with Blanche Balian.
Press review
28 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 24 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the search conducted at Sanofi’s headquarters by the National Anti-Fraud Office and the National Financial...
Analysis
27 November 2025
“CEO fraud” & banks’ liability: The French Court of Cassation clarifies
In two decisions dated June 12, 2025, the Court of Cassation clarified the conditions under which a bank may be...
Press review
21 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 17 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the appointment of Vincent Filhol as partner at Navacelle, strengthening the firm’s practice in white-collar...
Event
12 November 2025
[Webinar] The New Contours of the Crime of Terrorism
On 12 November 2025, the ABA hosted a panel discussion on the evolution of definitions and understanding of the crime...
Event
7 November 2025
Sapin 2: A Perspective on the Fight Against Corruption in France – Cornell University
A presentation to law students at Cornell University on 7 November 2025, of Sapin 2 law and the anticorruption enforcement in France.
Event
26 September 2025
Ethical dilemmas for lawyers in compliance and financial crime matters
A round-table discussion held at the Concilium Network Global Summit in Warsaw on 26 September 2025, co-organised by Navacelle.