Analysis
16 April 2024

The AFA’s new practical guide to corporate sponsorship operations

On 26 March 2024, the French Anti-Corruption Agency (“AFA”) published its new practical guide to securing patronage and sponsorship operations.

 

In a context of increase of sponsorship and patronage operations, enabling public or private companies to support numerous causes, particularly social, sporting and scientific, the AFA published a definitive version of its practical guide in this area on 26 March 2024.[1]

This guide is not binding and does not create any legal obligation for companies.[2] However, its content must be apprehended by implementing a risk-based approach, in order to be adapted to the risk profile of each company according to its business sector, organization, geographical location and size, pursuant to the principle of proportionality on which AFA’s recommendations are based.[3]

The purpose of the guide is to describe the situations and risk factors of probity breaches that companies may face (I) and to propose preventive, detection and remediation measures that companies can put in place to address them (II).

 

I. The AFA’s guide describes the situations and risk factors of probity breaches that companies may face when engaging in sponsorship and patronage operations

 

Companies may sponsor an event, a legal or natural person, or a product by means of monetary payments or through provision of material or human resources, subject to compliance with certain legislation. These operations must, where applicable, comply with certain legal and regulatory frames and restrictions, particularly with regard to tobacco and alcohol, the advertising of health products and the promotion of certain financial services.[4]

Sponsorship and patronage operations, which allow companies to obtain a direct or indirect benefit while providing support for a project or organization of public interest, may constitute risk factors for probity breaches.[5] The guide describes the risks of probity breaches when patronage and sponsorship operations are undertaken, for example the concealment of an offence such as corruption, influence peddling, illegal interest-taking and favoritism, as well as the misappropriation of the sponsorship. By doing so, the guide highlights the criminal risk that companies may face.[6]

The AFA guide specifies that potential bribery schemes may occur when members of a beneficiary organization, often working on a voluntary basis, also hold positions in administrations or companies from which the briber would like to obtain a favorable decision.[7] For example, a supplier who offers to supply a company with raw materials at reduced prices if it agrees, in return, to sponsor a sports association of which it is a member, could be prosecuted for active and passive private corruption.[8]

The guide also describes the numerous risk factors associated with sponsorship and patronage operations. These may be linked to the beneficiaries of the operations (their geographical location, the presence of public stakeholders, the absence of means for detecting probity breaches),[9] to the operations themselves (particularly with regard to their public exposure, the competitive environment or the urgency of the operation),[10] or to their process (for example, when the decision-making procedure for a sponsorship or patronage operation is not subject to any particular process within the beneficiary).[11]

 

II.   The AFA’s guide lists various prevention, detection and remediation measures for addressing the risks associated with sponsorship and patronage operations

 

On the one hand, preventive measures listed by the AFA include strengthening governance and top management role (notably by appointing a manager, setting up a dedicated committee, and establishing an internal procedure for assessing projects),[12] integrating the risk of probity breaches in sponsorship and patronage operations into the risk mapping process, as well as into the code of conduct and related policies, providing training to the staff involved in this type of operation and, lastly, evaluating the beneficiary organizations with regard to the risks of probity breaches.[13]

On the other hand, the detection and remediation measures listed by the AFA are the accessibility of the internal whistleblowing system to organizations benefiting from sponsorship and patronage, anti-corruption accounting controls, internal control and internal audit of the sponsorship and patronage system and remediation and continuous improvement through periodic reassessment of these operations’ rationale.[14]

In addition, the guide includes three supplementary appendices setting out the tax regimes for sponsorship and patronage and a list of key points for sponsorship and patronage policies and procedures.[15] In this respect, the AFA advises companies to mention, for example, the interest of the sponsorship for the company or the public-interest nature of a patronage.[16] Moreover, the AFA advises companies to mention in their sponsorship and patronage procedures the persons involved by such operations and the nature of the authorized operations.[17]

Related content

Press review
13 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 9 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction of the Rocher Group for failure to comply with its duty of vigilance,...
Event
11 March 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026 – The fight against bias and noise, which unconsciously cloud the...
Navacelle is hosting a panel on 26 March 2026, as part of the Paris Arbitration Week (PAW).
Event
10 March 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026 – Fraus omnia corrumpit… Really? Paris courts and the enforcement of...
Navacelle is hosting a panel regarding Corruption and Arbitration on 24 March 2026, as part of the Paris Arbitration Week (PAW).
Publication
19 February 2026
Assessing the fight against corruption: modalities and effectiveness of international peer review mechanisms
Revue internationale de la compliance et de l’éthique des affaires recently published an article co-authored by Vincent Filhol and Caroline...
News
10 February 2026
Key Findings from the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index
Transparency International has released the CPI for 2025, which highlights limited progress and persistent setbacks in the fight against corruption,...
EventNews
9 February 2026
The evolution of the FCPA and changes in anti-corruption enforcement in a changing geopolitical landscape
The IBA Anti-Corruption Asia Conference in Tokyo provided a rich forum for discussion on the evolution of the FCPA and...
Event
5 February 2026
Focus on French Compliance regulators
A conference for ESMD on French Compliance regulators' roles and tools, as well as interactions with judicial authorities and a...
2 min
Press review
23 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 19 January 2026
This week’s press review covers Free’s conviction by the CNIL for serious breaches of the GDPR’s security requirements; the French...
Press review
16 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 12 January 2026
This week’s press review covers the judicial public interest agreement entered into by HSBC in connection with dividend-related tax fraud...
Press review
9 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 5 January 2026
This week’s press review covers the sanctions imposed by the French Financial Markets Authority’s Enforcement Committee against M Capital Partners...
Press review
19 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 15 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the submissions of the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office in the Lafarge trial concerning allegations of...
Video
16 December 2025
Links between corruption and environmental crimes – CoSP
Vincent Filhol participated, as a member of the French delegation to the Conference of the States Parties to the United...