Analysis
16 September 2021

The French DPA (“Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public”) on the way to simplification

On 4 August 2021, a new Decree was promulgated aiming to simplify formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between Public Prosecutors Office and the legal person concerned.

 

Since the Sapin II law on transparency, fighting corruption and modernisation of the economy published on 10 December 2016, the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (hereinafter CJIP) is an alternative to prosecution offered by a French Public Prosecutor to a legal entity targeted by criminal inquiries or investigations regarding a limited type of offenses which allows the latter to enter into an agreement and avoid criminal charges in exchange of a fine and the implementation of a compliance program[1].

Initially, it was intended to apply to a certain number of offenses such as corruption and influence peddling. However, since 2016, two additional laws[2] and a decree[3] had extended the scope of application of the CJIP to a certain number of tax and environmental offenses.

Yet, on 4 August 2021 and after some years of practice, a new Decree[4] was promulgated aiming to simplify the formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the legal person concerned.

The previous procedural framework made it mandatory for the French Public Prosecutor to address the offer of a CJIP via a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt[5] and to grant the legal entity with a time frame for its consideration. The legal representatives of the legal entity then had to inform the Public Prosecutor of the acceptance or refusal of the CJIP by letter or through a statement made by the latter to the Public Prosecutor, who would draw up a formal report [6].

The 2021 Decree repeals all of the above and instead provides that “the offer for a CJIP is signed by the public prosecutor and, if accepted, by the representatives or lawyers of the legal entity”[7]. In that sense, the Decree implements the rights for the legal entity to be assisted by a counsel[8].

In the same vein, the obligation to pay the fine provided for in the CJIP with a certified cheque no longer applies [9].

Related content

Press review
23 February 2024
Press review – Week of 19 February 2024
This week’s press review covers Donald Trump and his sons’ conviction for fraud in New York, the decision of Paris...
Analysis
22 February 2024
New clarifications on the repression of tax fraud offences and tax fraud laundering by the...
On 13 December 2023, the Cour de cassation first ruled on the concept of non bis in idem, rejecting the...
Analysis
20 February 2024
A French dairy group suspected of tax fraud
Since 2018, Lactalis has been suspected of committing tax fraud and laundering the proceeds of such fraud via schemes involving...
Press review
16 February 2024
Press review – Week of 12 February 2024
This week’s press review looks back at the legacy of former French minister of Justice Robert Badinter who recently passed...
Press review
9 February 2024
Press review – Week of 5 February 2024
This week’s press review highlights the acquittal of former minister and mayor of Pau, François Bayrou, the accusation of a...
Press review
2 February 2024
Press review – Week of 29 January 2024
This week’s press review highlights the Transparency report on France's global position in the fight against corruption, Uber's fine in...
Analysis
30 January 2024
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and TRACFIN signed a working arrangement for closer cooperation
In accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation between Member States and with the European Union's institutions, provided for in...
Press review
26 January 2024
Press review – Week of 22 January 2024
This week’s press review highlights Amazon’s 32 million euro fine by a French administrative authority for the monitoring of its...
Press review
19 January 2024
Press review – Week of 15 January 2024
This week, the press review covers the validation by the French Supreme Court of Lafarge’s indictment for complicity in crimes...
Press review
Press review- Week of 8 January 2024
12 January 2024
Press review – Week of 8 January 2024
This week, the press review looks back at the conclusion of three Deferred Prosecution Agreements by Marseille’s Public Prosecutor’s office,...
Analysis
European Commission
10 January 2024
Digital Markets Act: Combating anti-competitive practices in the digital sector
On 6 September 2023, almost a year after the adoption of the Digital Markets Act, the European Commission published the...
Press review
22 December 2023
Press review – Week of 18 December 2023
This week's press review looks at the first hearings in Rabat in the “Qatarargate” corruption affair in the European Parliament,...