Analysis
16 September 2021

The French DPA (“Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public”) on the way to simplification

On 4 August 2021, a new Decree was promulgated aiming to simplify formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between Public Prosecutors Office and the legal person concerned.

 

Since the Sapin II law on transparency, fighting corruption and modernisation of the economy published on 10 December 2016, the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (hereinafter CJIP) is an alternative to prosecution offered by a French Public Prosecutor to a legal entity targeted by criminal inquiries or investigations regarding a limited type of offenses which allows the latter to enter into an agreement and avoid criminal charges in exchange of a fine and the implementation of a compliance program[1].

Initially, it was intended to apply to a certain number of offenses such as corruption and influence peddling. However, since 2016, two additional laws[2] and a decree[3] had extended the scope of application of the CJIP to a certain number of tax and environmental offenses.

Yet, on 4 August 2021 and after some years of practice, a new Decree[4] was promulgated aiming to simplify the formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the legal person concerned.

The previous procedural framework made it mandatory for the French Public Prosecutor to address the offer of a CJIP via a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt[5] and to grant the legal entity with a time frame for its consideration. The legal representatives of the legal entity then had to inform the Public Prosecutor of the acceptance or refusal of the CJIP by letter or through a statement made by the latter to the Public Prosecutor, who would draw up a formal report [6].

The 2021 Decree repeals all of the above and instead provides that “the offer for a CJIP is signed by the public prosecutor and, if accepted, by the representatives or lawyers of the legal entity”[7]. In that sense, the Decree implements the rights for the legal entity to be assisted by a counsel[8].

In the same vein, the obligation to pay the fine provided for in the CJIP with a certified cheque no longer applies [9].

Related content

Press review
Press review - Week of 25 july 2022
29 July 2022
Press review – Week of 25 July 2022
In this review, you will discover two CNIL’s recent decisions, the first one aiming at protecting data rental cars’ users and the second one aiming at regulating the ...
Analysis
Transposition of the European Whistleblowers Directive: Towards a reinforcement of the French protection system
25 July 2022
Transposition of the European Whistleblowers Directive: Towards a reinforcement of the French protection system
The text of the law aimed at improving the protection of whistleblowers, drafted by the Joint Committee, was approved by the National Assembly on 8 February and by the Se...
Press review
Press review - Week of 11 july 2022
15 July 2022
Press review – Week of 11 July 2022
In this press review you will find a decision of the French Cour de cassation which clarifies the interpretation of the principle of speciality in extradition matters. Mo...
Analysis
The challenges of environmental criminal law in the light of the deferred prosecution agreement in environmental matters
14 July 2022
The challenges of environmental criminal law in the light of the deferred prosecution agreement in environmental matters
A new deferred prosecution agreement in environmental matters is an opportunity to review the creation of this new mechanism serving French environmental criminal law, bu...
Publication
BDN 2022
14 July 2022
Bastille Day Newsletter 2022
On this 14th of July, lawyers at Navacelle offer you, as it does every year, a selection of noticeable events which occurred in France during the last 12 months in the fi...
Analysis
transfer of criminal liability following a merger or acquisition
14 July 2022
Transfer of criminal liability following a merger or acquisition
In a ruling of April 13, 2022, the Court clarified the nature of the control that must be performed by judges on prosecutions against absorbing companies after its histor...
Analysis
The cumulation of criminal and administrative sanctions in tax fraud
14 July 2022
The cumulation of criminal and administrative sanctions in tax fraud
The judges of the Court of Cassation recently ruled on the cumulation of criminal and fiscal sanctions in tax fraud cases. This decision confirms the case law which permi...
Publication
The Guide to Sanctions -GIR (2022)
10 July 2022
The Guide to Sanctions (2022) – GIR
Navacelle co-author of the third edition of the Global Investigation Review's Guide to Sanctions.
Press review
Press review - Week of 4 july 2022
8 July 2022
Press review – Week of 4 July 2022
In this press review, you will find two decisions of the French Court de cassation regarding criminal procedure with regards to sentencing as well as to the admissibility...
Press review
Presse review - Week of 27 June 2022
1 July 2022
Press review – Week of 27 June 2022
In the press review you will discover the clarifications given by the Criminal Chamber of the French Court de cassation in different decisions, in the field of offences a...
Press review
Press review - Week of 20 June 2022
24 June 2022
Press review – Week of 20 June 2022
In the press review you will discover the new article of the French criminal code harmonizing the repression of “prise illégale d'intérêt”, a major clarification o...
Publication
Guidance on Internal Anti-Bribery and Corruption Investigations
22 June 2022
Guidance on internal anti-bribery and corruption investigations
Highlight of the first-ever guidelines issued by the French authorities on internal anti-corruption investigations by Ropes & Gray LLP and our partner Stéphane de Navace...