Analysis
8 July 2020

French criminal law in the face of Covid-19 – Navacelle for the ABA

Stéphane de Navacelle, Clémentine Duverne and Princessa Fouda co-authors of “Recent developments in criminal law in France amidst the Coronavirus pandemic” paper, as a contribution to the International criminal law report about Covid-19 in different jurisdictions from the American Bar Association, with warm thanks to co-chairs Anna Laniado, Cyreka Jacobs and Arthur Traldi

 

In response to the coronavirus pandemic, the French government declared a nation-wide state of emergency on March 23, 2020 [1], enabling the government for a period of 3 months, to take by decree any necessary measures to prevent further spread of the covid-19 in France. The lockdown was issued by decree of the French Minister of Health [2]. Accordingly, on March 25, 2020, a decree amending French criminal procedure was enacted. (hereafter the “March 25 Decree”) [3].

Moreover, the law establishing the state of emergency amended the French Public Health Code introducing the offence of violating the lockdown [4]. Individuals are liable for a fine of 135 euros [5]. In case of a second violation occurring within a 15-day period, the fine is increased to 200 euros [6]. In case of a third violation occurring within a 30-day period, individuals face up to a 6-month jail sentence and a 3,750 euro fine [7].

 

Protection of prisoners

It stands to reason that jails are especially susceptible to the spread of COVID-19 considering the difficult implementation of “protection measures” as well as the lockdown in cells. Therefore, articles 27 to 29 of the March 25 Decree allow the Judge responsible for the enforcement of sentences to shorten by two months the sentence of convicted persons imprisoned during the state of emergency [8], to grant early release to prisoners whose remaining detention period is 2 months or less [9] and to convert sentences of 6 months’ imprisonment into community service and day-fines, inter alia.

On April 29, 2020, the French Minister of Justice stated that the number of prisoners had decreased by 11 500 since March 16, 2020 [10]. This unprecedented decline is due both to a decrease of court proceedings and to these early release measures.

However, these measures are rather paradoxical considering notably Article 16 of the March 25 Decree which extends automatically the custody time limits by two months when the prison sentence incurred is less than or equal to five years, by three months in other cases and by six months for the cases heard before the Court of Appeal. These extensions have been widely criticized and gave rise to a number of procedures initiated before the Conseil d’Etat (French Administrative Supreme Court), notably by the Paris Bar Association as well as by the French National Bar Council requesting the suspension of the enforcement of the measures at stake. These requests were however denied [11].

 

Protection of officers of the court

As part of early actions taken by the government all hearings were postponed except emergency cases to ensure protection of the officers of the court such as judges and lawyers as well as prosecuted individuals [12]. In that respect, as of March 12, 2020, the prescriptive period for prosecution and punishment has been suspended until one month after the end of the state of emergency [13]. If a legal act interrupts the prescriptive period such act remains legally valid but will take effect at the end of the suspension.

Additionally, the March 25 Decree, modifies the procedural rules governing hearings. Thus, hearings can be led by only one judge subject to a decision of the president of the court [14]. It also provides that hearings and rulings can be closed to the public should the president of the court decide so. This measure is rare enough since hearings and judgment are to be pronounced publicly pursuant to article 6§1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Moreover, the use of videoconferencing has been generalized before all criminal courts, save for felony courts (Cour d’assises), without the need to obtain the agreement of the parties [15].

Related content

Publication
BDN 2022
14 July 2022
Bastille Day Newsletter 2022
On this 14th of July, lawyers at Navacelle offer you, as it does every year, a selection of noticeable events which occurred in France during the last 12 months in the fi...
Press review
Press review - Week of 20 June 2022
24 June 2022
Press review – Week of 20 June 2022
In the press review you will discover the new article of the French criminal code harmonizing the repression of “prise illégale d'intérêt”, a major clarification o...
News
French duty of care
21 June 2022
The French duty of care in the context of its Europe-wide application
On February 23, the European Commission unveiled its proposal for a Directive on the Duty of Vigilance, which aims to promote sustainable and responsible behavior by comp...
Press review
Press review - week of 21 march 2022
25 March 2022
Press review – Week of 21 march 2022
In this press review, the second environmental CJIP concluded since its adoption, clarification from the Court of Justice on the conditions under which the authorities ca...
Analysis
What will be the impact of the transposition of the EU Directive on the protection of whistleblowers into French law?
14 July 2021
What will be the impact of the transposition of the EU Directive on the protection of whistleblowers into French law?
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
The strengthening of environmental justice through the introduction of French Environmental Convention judiciaire d’in...
Bastille Day 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
AFA updated its recommendations regarding anticorruption programs
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates
Publication
14 April 2021
The Risks of Individual Guilty Pleas in France
Key advice for professionals when contemplating a guilty plea procedure in France in the Anti-Corruption report.
Analysis
23 March 2021
European Compliance and Ethics Community: Whistleblowing protection panel (in French)
Stéphane de Navacelle, speaks about whistleblowers protection, its transposition into French law and the impact of the dedicated Directive on French companies, for the E...
Publication
27 January 2021
Internal criminal investigation fundamentals (in French)
Julie Zorrilla, Princessa Fouda and Sara Deyhim present the internal criminal investigation fundamentals for Compliances Magazine.
Analysis
14 December 2020
French Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law : clarification on competent court for injunction
A recent Versailles Court of Appeal decision clarifies the French Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law and rules on the competent court for injunction proceedings seeking to e...
Publication
6 April 2020
Highlights on the impact of Covid-19
NAVACELLE trainees Clément Allais, Amelle Djedi, Soukaina El-Mekkaoui, Christelle Meda and Ekaterina Oleinikova have put together highlights on the impact of Covid-19 on...