Analysis
14 July 2021

AFA updated its recommendations regarding anticorruption programs

Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates

 

Pursuant to the provisions of the French Sapin II Law[i], the French Anticorruption Agency (“AFA”) issued recommendations aimed at assisting public and private legal entities – whether subject or not to the obligation to implement preventive and detective measures against corruption[ii] – in their initiatives to prevent and detect integrity violations within their entities.

After issuing initial recommendations in 2017, AFA updated them on 4 December 2020. Similarly, to the national diagnosis launched by AFA to assess the effectiveness of corruption prevention and detection systems implemented within companies[iii], the recommendations’ update is part of the first steps of the multi-year national anti-corruption plan 2020-2022 carried out by AFA and approved by the government in early 2020[iv].

The AFA recommendations which were initially organized around the 8 pillars of Article 17 of the Sapin II law and are now centered around three main pillars: the top management’s commitment, the risk mapping and the risk management.

This new organization is a reminder that while all anti-corruption measures provided for by Sapin II must be implemented, the involvement of the management body is essential and risk mapping is the cornerstone of the anti-corruption system.

As a result, the scope of the risk mapping is extended to the risks of influence peddling[v]. AFA further recommends the extension of the third-party category submitted to due diligence to include third parties with whom the company would like to enter into a relationship for the purpose of an acquisition or for sponsorship.[vi] In addition, beyond the training initiatives intended for managers and the most exposed employees, AFA urges to raise all employees’ awareness regarding the fight against corruption.[vii] With regard to the internal control and audit system, AFA recommends the establishment of a specific procedure setting out “the processes and situations involving identified risks, the frequency of controls and their procedures, the persons in charge of these controls and the rules for transmitting the results to the management body” [viii].

Furthermore, AFA strengthens the authority of its recommendations. Despite not being legislative in nature, the recommendations are now “opposable” against AFA as part of itin the context of its controls[ix]. Accordingly, in the context of an AFA inspection, companies henceforth benefit from a presumption of compliance when they indicate having designed their compliance program in accordance with AFA’s recommendations. It then falls to AFA to demonstrate that this application has been “ineffective, incorrect or incomplete” [x].

These amendments are not a surprise since they are in line with the decision of the Sanction Commission issued on July 4, 2019, which states that when a company indicates having complied with the methodology recommended by the AFA, “it must be deemed to have provided sufficient information, unless the Agency proves that it failed, in reality, to follow the recommendations” [xi].

Related content

Press review
Press review - Week of 9 january 2023
13 January 2023
Press review – Week of 9 January 2023
This week in the press review, a dismissal of the Chlordecone case in the French West Indies and a $17.2...
Publication
The Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations - 7th Edition
13 January 2023
Navacelle co-authors GIR of the Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations – 7th edition
NAVACELLE co-authors the French chapter of the seventh edition of Global Investigations Review’s Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations.
Press review
Week of 2 January 2023
6 January 2023
Press review – Week of 2 January 2023
This week in the press review, two Members of the European Parliament have been subjected to immunity waiver proceedings in...
Press review
Press review - Week of 12 december 2022
16 December 2022
Press review – Week of 12 December 2022
In this press review, from a judicial point of view, there are several important events: The Court de Cassation ruled...
Publication
LIR - France edition
13 December 2022
France and the duty of vigilance, picture of a battlefield
Julie Zorrilla and Roxane Castro contribute to the first Legal Industry Reviews - France edition.
Press review
Week 5 December 2022
9 December 2022
Press review – Week of 5 December 2022
In this press review, you will have the opportunity to discover two court decisions. The first one, is issued by...
Press review
2 December 2022
Press review – Week of 28 November 2022
In this press review, you will discover several important judicial events: the French Supreme Court clarified the status of victim...
Event
Ifaci demain en main - vignette
24 November 2022
Roundtable – Allegations – Investigations : The edges of tomorrow
Stéphane de Navacelle participated in IFACI's annual conference: "Demain en mains" on the theme "Allegations - Investigations : The edges...
Event
17 November 2022
Identification of the contractual actors of Compliance
Julie Zorrilla participated in the Colloque "Contract and compliance: the actors and their strategies" at the University of Nîmes.
Press review
Week of 31 October 2022
4 November 2022
Press review – Week of 31 October 2022
In this press review, you will find details on the new methods adopted by the French national anti-terrorist prosecutor's office...
Press review
Week of 17 October 2022
21 October 2022
Press review – Week of 17 October 2022
In this press review you will find two significant events: (1) Lafarge pleads guilty in the United States for providing...
Event
Délégation des Barreaux de France
13 October 2022
Formation – Companies and Human Rights: European Perspectives
Stéphane de Navacelle will participate in the seminar on companies and human rights organised by the Délégation des Barreaux de...