Analysis
14 July 2021

AFA updated its recommendations regarding anticorruption programs

Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates

 

Pursuant to the provisions of the French Sapin II Law[i], the French Anticorruption Agency (“AFA”) issued recommendations aimed at assisting public and private legal entities – whether subject or not to the obligation to implement preventive and detective measures against corruption[ii] – in their initiatives to prevent and detect integrity violations within their entities.

After issuing initial recommendations in 2017, AFA updated them on 4 December 2020. Similarly, to the national diagnosis launched by AFA to assess the effectiveness of corruption prevention and detection systems implemented within companies[iii], the recommendations’ update is part of the first steps of the multi-year national anti-corruption plan 2020-2022 carried out by AFA and approved by the government in early 2020[iv].

The AFA recommendations which were initially organized around the 8 pillars of Article 17 of the Sapin II law and are now centered around three main pillars: the top management’s commitment, the risk mapping and the risk management.

This new organization is a reminder that while all anti-corruption measures provided for by Sapin II must be implemented, the involvement of the management body is essential and risk mapping is the cornerstone of the anti-corruption system.

As a result, the scope of the risk mapping is extended to the risks of influence peddling[v]. AFA further recommends the extension of the third-party category submitted to due diligence to include third parties with whom the company would like to enter into a relationship for the purpose of an acquisition or for sponsorship.[vi] In addition, beyond the training initiatives intended for managers and the most exposed employees, AFA urges to raise all employees’ awareness regarding the fight against corruption.[vii] With regard to the internal control and audit system, AFA recommends the establishment of a specific procedure setting out “the processes and situations involving identified risks, the frequency of controls and their procedures, the persons in charge of these controls and the rules for transmitting the results to the management body” [viii].

Furthermore, AFA strengthens the authority of its recommendations. Despite not being legislative in nature, the recommendations are now “opposable” against AFA as part of itin the context of its controls[ix]. Accordingly, in the context of an AFA inspection, companies henceforth benefit from a presumption of compliance when they indicate having designed their compliance program in accordance with AFA’s recommendations. It then falls to AFA to demonstrate that this application has been “ineffective, incorrect or incomplete” [x].

These amendments are not a surprise since they are in line with the decision of the Sanction Commission issued on July 4, 2019, which states that when a company indicates having complied with the methodology recommended by the AFA, “it must be deemed to have provided sufficient information, unless the Agency proves that it failed, in reality, to follow the recommendations” [xi].

Related content

Analysis
Proposition Loi Gauvain
20 October 2021
Analysis of the bill to reinforce the fight against corruption by Deputy Gauvain
Navacelle team has examined the “Bill to reinforce the fight against corruption” which has just been submitted by the Deputy Raphaël Gauvain at the National Assembly...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Alexandre Coudreau
Student Sciences Po
Salomé Garnier
Associate Navacelle
News
16 September 2021
The French DPA (“Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public”) on the way to simplification
On 4 August 2021, a new Decree was promulgated aiming to simplify formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between Public Prosecutors Office and the legal pers...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Louis Beltaire
Trainee lawyer
Alexandre Desevedavy
Trainee lawyer
Salomé Garnier
Associate Navacelle
Publication
3 September 2021
The European Parliament Lays the Foundations of a Corporate Due Diligence and Corporate Accountability
Julie Zorrilla, Thomas Lapierre and Stéphane de Navacelle, highlight for the International Bar Association anticorrpution news, the adoption on 10 March 2021 by the Memb...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Thomas Lapierre
Associate Navacelle
Publication
20 August 2021
It’s not an “ego fight”: The do’s and don’ts of monitorships
Experts from around the world discuss what authorities, companies and monitors should do to ensure that a period of compliance oversight ends successfully. “the quality...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Adam Dobrik
Journalist
Analysis
14 July 2021
Paris Court of Appeal highlights the growing importance of compliance in arbitration
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Enforcement & Court Decisions
Analysis
14 July 2021
What will be the impact of the transposition of the EU Directive on the protection of whistleblowers into French law?
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
The evaluation mission of the Sapin II law calls for a boost in France’s anti-corruption policy
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
Compliance in the public sector: The Ministry of the Armed Forces issued its Code of prevention of breaches of probity
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
Short overview of the French legal requirement for internal controls relating to the AML-CFT
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
French initiatives in the fight against corruption for the period 2021-2030
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
The strengthening of environmental justice through the introduction of French Environmental Convention judiciaire d’in...
Bastille Day 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
An illustration of the employer’s disciplinary power in case of non-compliance with internal company rules
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Enforcement & Court Decisions