Analysis
15 January 2021

French Anticorruption Agency’s updates recommendations regarding anticorruption programs

Julie Zorrilla, Princessa Fouda and Héloïse Vigouroux showcase the update to the French Anticorruption Agency’s recommendations for private and public legal entities to fight corruption.

 

Pursuant to the provisions of French Sapin II Law (“Loi Sapin II”)1, the French Anticorruption Agency (“AFA”) issued recommendations aimed at assisting public and private legal entities – whether they are subject or not to the obligation provided for in Article 17 of the Sapin II law to implement preventive and detective measures against corruption2 – in their initiatives to prevent and detect integrity violations within their entities.

As well as the national diagnosis launched by AFA to assess the effectiveness of corruption prevention and detection systems implemented within companies3, the recommendations’ update is part of the first steps of the multi-year national anti-corruption plan 2020-2022 carried out by AFA and approved by the government in early 2020 4.

AFA therefore improves its recommendations as to the 8 pillars of Article 17 of Sapin II law. Hence, the scope of the risk mapping is extended to the risks of influence peddling5. AFA further recommends the extension of the third-party category submitted to due diligence to include third parties with whom the company would like to enter into a relationship for the purpose of an acquisition or for sponsorship6. In addition to training initiatives intended for managers and most exposed employee, AFA urges to raise all employees’ awareness regarding the fight against corruption7. With regard to the internal control and audit system, AFA recommends the establishment of a specific procedure setting out “the processes and situations involving identified risks, the frequency of controls and their procedures, the persons in charge of these controls and the rules for transmitting the results to the management body8.

Furthermore, AFA strengthens the authority of its recommendations. Despite not being legislative in nature, the recommendations are now “opposable” against AFA as part of its inspections9. Accordingly, in the context of an AFA inspection, companies henceforth benefit from a presumption of compliance when they indicate having designed their compliance program in accordance with AFA’s recommendations. It then falls to AFA to demonstrate that this application has been “ineffective, incorrect or incomplete”.10. This amendment is in line with and confirms the decision of the Sanction Commission issued on July 4, 2019, which states that when a company indicates having complied with the methodology recommended by the AFA, “it must be deemed to have provided sufficient information, unless the Agency proves that it failed, in reality, to follow the recommendations11.

Related content

Publication
3 September 2021
The European Parliament Lays the Foundations of a Corporate Due Diligence and Corporate Accountability
Julie Zorrilla, Thomas Lapierre and Stéphane de Navacelle, highlight for the International Bar Association anticorrpution news, the adoption on 10 March 2021 by the Memb...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Thomas Lapierre
Associate Navacelle
Analysis
14 July 2021
The PNF looks back on a very unusual 2020 year
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
Compliance in the public sector: The Ministry of the Armed Forces issued its Code of prevention of breaches of probity
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
Future promulgation of a Law regarding the restitution of ill-gottens assets diverted by officials to the local populati...
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Publication
8 March 2021
Navacelle co-authors GIR of the Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations – 5th edition
NAVACELLE co-authors the French chapter of the fifth edition of Global Investigations Review’s Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations.
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Clémentine Duverne
Partner Navacelle
Analysis
20 January 2021
Anti-corruption developments in jurisdictions around the world
International Bar Association Asset Recovery and Anti-Corruption Committees invited anti-corruption experts from around the world to meet in Paris to discuss the latest a...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Publication
26 December 2018
IBA – The first step towards implementing DPAs in France
Stéphane de Navacelle author of “The first step towards implementing DPAs in France” published by IBA’s Business Crime Committee.
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Analysis
2 October 2018
First CJIP agreed to with the National Prosecutor’s Office in the field of international corruption and in agreement w...
Stéphane de Navacelle and Sandrine dos Santos authors of “First CJIP agreed to with the National Prosecutor’s Office in the field of international corruption and in ...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Sandrine Dos Santos
Lawyer
Analysis
12 June 2018
IBA – France’s increasing power over multiple jurisdiction prosecutions in corruption cases
Stéphane de Navacelle, Julie Zorrilla, Matthieu Bagard and Assumpta Nziyumvira co-author article on « France’s increasing power over multiple jurisdiction prosecution...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Matthieu Bagard
Lawyer
Assumpta Nziyumvira
Trainee lawyer
Analysis
16 March 2017
The French Anticorruption Agency (AFA) explained – Sapin 2 law
The decree will enter into force on March 16, 2017. It defines the three tasks of the AFA which will replace the Central Corruption Prevention Department right from the a...