Analysis
8 December 2020

Criminal liability of the acquiring company for acts committed by the acquired company prior to the merger

Recent overturn of the French Cour de cassation case law regarding the criminal liability of the acquiring company for acts committed by the acquired company prior to the merger by acquisition.

 

On 25 November 2020, the Criminal Chamber of the Cour de Cassation (French judicial Supreme Court) issued a major reversal of its case law, ruling that in the event of a merger by acquisition [1], the criminal liability of the acquiring company could be incurred for acts committed by the acquired company before the merger.

In the present case, a company was summoned as a defendant in front of the Criminal Court for unintentional burning of property belonging to another, consequence of a breach of the legal duty of safety or caution required by law.

However, it appeared that the company had been acquired by merger by acquisition prior to the trial which therefore cannot proceed as the acquired company dissolved.

According to the long-standing case law of the Cour de cassation based on article 121-1 of the French Penal Code, an acquiring company cannot be prosecuted and convicted for offenses committed prior to the merger by the acquired company.

However, in its decision of 25 November 2020, the Criminal Chamber of the Cour de Cassation reversed its case law, ruling that the acquired company transfers its liabilities to the acquiring company in the event that the merger transaction falls under the scope of the European Directive 78/855/EC related to mergers of public limited liability companies.

This ruling is a result of the decision rendered by the European Court of Human Rights on 24 October 2019 ruling the existence of the economic and operational continuity between the acquired company and the acquiring company which excludes a distinction between their criminal liabilities.

However, the transfer remains limited. The acquiring company can only be condemned to a financial sanction such as a fine or confiscation.

Furthermore, the Criminal Chamber of the Cour de cassation establishes a specific regime for cases where the merger by acquisition is solely designed to avoid criminal liability of the acquired company. This regime applies to all companies, whether or not they fall under the scope of the European Directive.

In such cases, financial sanctions may be combined with additional sanctions, such as the dissolution of the company, debarment from public procurement, etc.

It therefore appears that it is henceforth essential to strengthen due diligence verifications regarding the situation of the acquired company, prior to any merger by acquisition, in order to establish the risk incurred by the acquiring company with certainty.

In the event of a criminal risk relating to the acquired company, a thorough analysis of the facts and the context of the merger by acquisition shall become good practice. Especially since the interpretation of this landmark decision and the concept of fraud by French courts remains uncertain.

 

  • Specific caution must be observed regarding the risk of criminal liability of public limited liability companies
  • Especially in cases where the merger by acquisition could be deemed designed to avoid criminal liability

Related content

Press review
13 June 2025
Press review – Week of 9 June 2025
This week's press review covers the indictment of Pascaline Bongo in a corruption and money laundering case, the designation of...
Press review
6 June 2025
Press review – Week of 2 June 2025
This week’s press review covers the coordination at the French national level of the economic sanctions decided by the European...
5 min
Event
26 May 2025
[Webinar] Enhanced Anti-Corruption Cooperation: A UK–Switzerland–France Perspective
Co-chairs of the American Bar Association International Law Section's International Anti-Corruption Committee suggested a discussion of anti-corruption efforts outside the...
Analysis
20 May 2025
CJIP Paprec: criminal penalties applicable to violations of the rules governing public procurement
On 10 February 2025, Paprec signed a “Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public” – CJIP (equivalent to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement) to...
Press review
9 May 2025
Press review – Week of 5 May 2025
This week’s press review covers the resignation of François Commeinhes from his position as mayor of Sète, following his final...
Press review
2 May 2025
Press review – Week of 28 April 2025
This week’s press review covers the requisitions made against François Fillon in the fictitious employment case following a cassation ruling,...
Press review
25 April 2025
Press review – Week of 21 April 2025
This week’s press review covers the release of Prince Paul of Romania by French authorities, despite a European arrest warrant...
Press review
18 April 2025
Press review – Week of 14 April 2025
This week’s press review covers the extension of the investigation into Eric Garandeau for illegal taking of interest in the...
Press review
11 April 2025
Press review – Week of 7 April 2025
This week’s press review covers the European Parliament's vote to postpone the application of the CSRD to certain companies, as...
Press review
4 April 2025
Press review – Week of 31 March 2025
This week’s press review covers the 150 million euro fine imposed by the French Competition Authority on several subsidiaries of...
Press review
28 March 2025
Press review – Week of 24 March 2025
This week’s press review covers the summoning of Élysée Secretary General Alexis Kohler to a Senate committee of inquiry into...
Press review
21 March 2025
Press review – Week of 17 March 2025
This week’s press review covers the lawsuit filed by two NGOs against Carrefour for failing to exercise due diligence in...