Analysis
4 November 2021

U.S. announces tougher approach of the Department of Justice in the fight against economic crime

Navacelle team highlights the review of the U.S. Department of Justice's (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime.

 

On 28 October 2021, during a speech at the 36th National Institute on White Collar Crime organized by the American Bar Association, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a significant review of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime. Aside from emphasizing the importance of compliance programs[1], four key points are to be taken away from the series of measures announced.

 

I. A global approach towards the background of a company under investigation

Prosecutors must now take a “holistic approach” when assessing the appropriate response to an investigation involving a company. They must therefore consider any previous reprehensible misconduct attributable to it, without limiting its examination to past misconduct similar to the alleged offence.

To this end, prosecutors are invited to consider all misconducts committed by the company and discovered during any previous enforcement action, whether national or foreign, criminal, civil or regulatory conducted against it or, where applicable, against its parent company, divisions, affiliates, subsidiaries and any other group entities.[2]

 

II. A return to the “Yates Memo” standard regarding the liability of natural persons

These new measures also mark the return to the “Yates memo” standard, which required, in order to benefit from a cooperation credit, that companies provide the DoJ with all relevant elements (except privileged information) relating to the individuals involved in the alleged company’s misconduct.

The company must therefore identify all persons involved or responsible for the alleged misconduct, regardless of their position, status or seniority, whether internal or external to the company.[3]

 

III. Use of monitorship as much as necessary

The use of an independent monitor will be put in place as much as it may be necessary to ensure that the company complies to the commitments made. Thus, prosecutors will have to give priority to the appointment of an independent monitor when a company’s compliance program and controls have not been tested, have been proven ineffective, or when they are inadequately resourced or not fully implemented at the time of the agreement.[4]

 

IV. The creation of the Corporate Crime Advisory Group to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime

This working group will be responsible for the review of the DOJ’s approach to the prosecution of unlawful conduct by companies and their managers, executives and employees in order to make any recommendations and propose any appropriate policy revisions.

It will examine various topics such as cooperation credits, recidivism and factors for determining whether a case should be resolved via a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) or a plea agreement.

In addition, this working group will also consider how the DOJ can invest in new technologies such as artificial intelligence to help investigators when dealing with large amounts of data, but also how to best utilize the department’s various resources to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime.[5]

 

The speech of Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco can be found here and her memorandum here, for more details.

Related content

Press review
26 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 22 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the settlement reached by UBS ending a long-standing tax dispute in France, the filing of...
Analysis
22 September 2025
CJIP Surys: a fine, a compliance penalty and compensation for the victim
On 8 July 2025, SAS SURYS entered into a Judicial Public Interest Agreement (CJIP) in respect of acts of bribery...
Press review
19 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 15 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the dismantling of the darknet platform “DFAS” which led to the arrest of two suspects...
Press review
12 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 8 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the decision by the French Court of Cassation requesting the Paris Court of Appeal to...
Press review
5 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 1 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the issuance by the French judiciary of seven arrest warrants targeting Bashar Al-Assad and several...
Press review
29 August 2025
Press Review – Week of 25 August 2025
This week’s press review covers the announcement of the arrest of over 1,200 cybercriminals during Interpol’s Serengeti 2.0 operation in...
Press review
22 August 2025
Press Review – Week of 18 August 2025
This week’s press review covers the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) corruption investigation against the South African telecoms company MTN,...
Press review
14 August 2025
Press Review – Week of 11 August 2025
This week’s press review covers a priority preliminary ruling on constitutionality (QPC) issued on August 8 concerning a decision by...
Press review
8 August 2025
Press Review – Week of 4 August 2025
This week’s press review covers the ongoing judicial investigation concerning allegations of corruption and conflicts of interest against former European...
Press review
press review
1 August 2025
Press Review – Week of 28 July 2025
This week’s press review covers the legal battle between the Bolloré group and France’s financial markets authority over Vivendi, the...
Press review
25 July 2025
Press review – Week of 21 July 2025
This week's press review covers the opening of an investigation by the Paris prosecutor's office against Kylian Mbappé, suspected of...
Press review
18 July 2025
Press review – Week of 14 July 2025
This week's press review covers the confirmation by the Paris Court of Appeal of the rejection of the request for...