Analysis
4 November 2021

U.S. announces tougher approach of the Department of Justice in the fight against economic crime

Navacelle team highlights the review of the U.S. Department of Justice's (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime.

 

On 28 October 2021, during a speech at the 36th National Institute on White Collar Crime organized by the American Bar Association, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a significant review of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime. Aside from emphasizing the importance of compliance programs[1], four key points are to be taken away from the series of measures announced.

 

I. A global approach towards the background of a company under investigation

Prosecutors must now take a “holistic approach” when assessing the appropriate response to an investigation involving a company. They must therefore consider any previous reprehensible misconduct attributable to it, without limiting its examination to past misconduct similar to the alleged offence.

To this end, prosecutors are invited to consider all misconducts committed by the company and discovered during any previous enforcement action, whether national or foreign, criminal, civil or regulatory conducted against it or, where applicable, against its parent company, divisions, affiliates, subsidiaries and any other group entities.[2]

 

II. A return to the “Yates Memo” standard regarding the liability of natural persons

These new measures also mark the return to the “Yates memo” standard, which required, in order to benefit from a cooperation credit, that companies provide the DoJ with all relevant elements (except privileged information) relating to the individuals involved in the alleged company’s misconduct.

The company must therefore identify all persons involved or responsible for the alleged misconduct, regardless of their position, status or seniority, whether internal or external to the company.[3]

 

III. Use of monitorship as much as necessary

The use of an independent monitor will be put in place as much as it may be necessary to ensure that the company complies to the commitments made. Thus, prosecutors will have to give priority to the appointment of an independent monitor when a company’s compliance program and controls have not been tested, have been proven ineffective, or when they are inadequately resourced or not fully implemented at the time of the agreement.[4]

 

IV. The creation of the Corporate Crime Advisory Group to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime

This working group will be responsible for the review of the DOJ’s approach to the prosecution of unlawful conduct by companies and their managers, executives and employees in order to make any recommendations and propose any appropriate policy revisions.

It will examine various topics such as cooperation credits, recidivism and factors for determining whether a case should be resolved via a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) or a plea agreement.

In addition, this working group will also consider how the DOJ can invest in new technologies such as artificial intelligence to help investigators when dealing with large amounts of data, but also how to best utilize the department’s various resources to strengthen criminal law enforcement towards economic crime.[5]

 

The speech of Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco can be found here and her memorandum here, for more details.

Related content

Press review
19 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 15 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the submissions of the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office in the Lafarge trial concerning allegations of...
News
12 December 2025
Towards a French Legislative Framework for Internal Investigations
Following on from the report by the Club des juristes, co-authored by Raphaël Gauvain and Stéphane de Navacelle, the French...
Press review
12 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 8 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the risk of significant financial penalties facing several European states as a result of arbitration...
Press review
5 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 1 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the opening of the trial of seven individuals accused of attempted fraud and corruption targeting...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Press review
28 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 24 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the search conducted at Sanofi’s headquarters by the National Anti-Fraud Office and the National Financial...
Press review
21 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 17 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the appointment of Vincent Filhol as partner at Navacelle, strengthening the firm’s practice in white-collar...
Press review
14 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 10 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the release, under judicial supervision, of Nicolas Sarkozy after twenty days in pre-trial detention, in...
Event
12 November 2025
[Webinar] The New Contours of the Crime of Terrorism
On 12 November 2025, the ABA hosted a panel discussion on the evolution of definitions and understanding of the crime...
Press review
7 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 3 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s examination of the legality of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump,...
Event
7 November 2025
Sapin 2: A Perspective on the Fight Against Corruption in France – Cornell University
A presentation to law students at Cornell University on 7 November 2025, of Sapin 2 law and the anticorruption enforcement in France.
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...