Analysis
16 March 2017

The French Anticorruption Agency (AFA) explained – Sapin 2 law

The decree will enter into force on March 16, 2017. It defines the three tasks of the AFA which will replace the Central Corruption Prevention Department right from the appointment of his Director scheduled on the same day.

 

Tasks. Pursuant to its tasks of participation to administrative coordination, the AFA will prepare a pluri-annual plan against corruption and will assist the competent French Authorities with respect to international organizations. Under its task of support for the State public authorities, the local authorities and any natural or legal person, will insure training, awareness and assistance upon prevention and risk detection. Under its task of disseminating information to prevent and detect corruption cases, the AFA will contribute, through its cooperation actions and its tasks of support and technical assistance, to enforce the international commitments of French Authorities.

Composition. The AFA includes control and expertise units, a Strategic Committee responsible for providing the overall policy and an Enforcement Committee (Article 2).

Procedure. When someone fails to comply with the duty to implement a prevention and detection system against corruption, the AFA Director will communicate an inspection report to the defendant and give him notice to present written observations. Afterwards, the Director will be able to issue a warning or submit a complaint to the Enforcement Committee, which has equal gender representation. He will also communicate the inspection report, observations, his opinion as to the facts and the sanction that he deems appropriate. The defendant will be given information on the charges against him. The Enforcement Committee will appoint a Rapporteur in charge of investigating the facts in an adversarial manner. The Defendant, who can be assisted by counsel of his choice, will receive the Director’s opinion and will be able to address observations. After two months, the Defendant will be summoned to a public hearing (except when this could interfere with public order, business secrecy or any other legally-protected secrets) during which he will be able to present oral observations, responding the Director representative’s observations (Article 5).

Judges and category A civil servants, who are part of the control and expertise unit “should present their accreditation cards when they conduct onsite controls, which can only be done within business premises, or within private individuals’ home, and need to take place during business hours, after informing the representative of the controlled entity that he can be assisted by any person of his choice” (Article 7).

Conflicts of interest and recusal. Article 6 and 8 address conflicts of interest between members of the Control and Expertise units and the ones from the Enforcement Committee, and the recusal of those persons.

Publication of the administrative decision on the French Anticorruption Agency

Additional subdirectorates of the AFA. Pursuant to the terms of the administrative decision of March 14, 2017 on the organization of the AFA, the AFA “includes, in addition to the Enforcement Committee and the Strategic Committee, the Advisory, Strategic Analysis and International Affairs Subdirectorate, the Control Subdirectorate and the General Secretariat” (Article 1).

The Advisory, Strategic Analysis and International Affairs Subdirectorate. The Advisory, Strategic Analysis and International Affairs Subdirectorate is in charge of the centralization, outreach of information and good practices, and of the development of recommendations to assist companies which must implement a corruption or influence-peddling risks prevention and detection system (Article 2).

The Control Subdirectorate. The Control Subdirectorate conducts off-site and on-site verifications of the implementation of compliance measures (code of conduct, whistleblower mechanism, risk mapping, evaluating procedures of clients, first rank providers and intermediaries’ situation regarding risk mapping, internal or external accounting control procedures, training arrangements for executives and personnel most exposed to the risk of corruption and influence peddling, disciplinary regime, internal framework for controlling implemented measures). It monitors the execution of decisions taken by the Sanctions Commission and controls the execution of the sentence to implement a compliance program. It is tasked with controlling the adequacy of measures regarding the prevention and detection of corruption and compliance measures put in place. It can issue recommendations for the purpose of improving existing procedures (Article 3).

Related content

Publication
3 September 2021
The European Parliament Lays the Foundations of a Corporate Due Diligence and Corporate Accountability
Julie Zorrilla, Thomas Lapierre and Stéphane de Navacelle, highlight for the International Bar Association anticorrpution news, the adoption on 10 March 2021 by the Memb...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Thomas Lapierre
Associate Navacelle
Analysis
14 July 2021
The PNF looks back on a very unusual 2020 year
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
Compliance in the public sector: The Ministry of the Armed Forces issued its Code of prevention of breaches of probity
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
14 July 2021
Future promulgation of a Law regarding the restitution of ill-gottens assets diverted by officials to the local populati...
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Publication
8 March 2021
Navacelle co-authors GIR of the Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations – 5th edition
NAVACELLE co-authors the French chapter of the fifth edition of Global Investigations Review’s Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations.
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Clémentine Duverne
Partner Navacelle
Analysis
20 January 2021
Anti-corruption developments in jurisdictions around the world
International Bar Association Asset Recovery and Anti-Corruption Committees invited anti-corruption experts from around the world to meet in Paris to discuss the latest a...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Analysis
15 January 2021
French Anticorruption Agency’s updates recommendations regarding anticorruption programs
Julie Zorrilla, Princessa Fouda and Héloïse Vigouroux showcase the update to the French Anticorruption Agency’s recommendations for private and public legal entities ...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Princessa Fouda
Lawyer
Héloïse Vigouroux
Trainee lawyer
Publication
26 December 2018
IBA – The first step towards implementing DPAs in France
Stéphane de Navacelle author of “The first step towards implementing DPAs in France” published by IBA’s Business Crime Committee.
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Analysis
2 October 2018
First CJIP agreed to with the National Prosecutor’s Office in the field of international corruption and in agreement w...
Stéphane de Navacelle and Sandrine dos Santos authors of “First CJIP agreed to with the National Prosecutor’s Office in the field of international corruption and in ...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Sandrine Dos Santos
Lawyer
Analysis
12 June 2018
IBA – France’s increasing power over multiple jurisdiction prosecutions in corruption cases
Stéphane de Navacelle, Julie Zorrilla, Matthieu Bagard and Assumpta Nziyumvira co-author article on « France’s increasing power over multiple jurisdiction prosecution...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Matthieu Bagard
Lawyer
Assumpta Nziyumvira
Trainee lawyer