Analysis
16 March 2017

The French Anticorruption Agency (AFA) explained – Sapin 2 law

The decree will enter into force on March 16, 2017. It defines the three tasks of the AFA which will replace the Central Corruption Prevention Department right from the appointment of his Director scheduled on the same day.

 

Tasks. Pursuant to its tasks of participation to administrative coordination, the AFA will prepare a pluri-annual plan against corruption and will assist the competent French Authorities with respect to international organizations. Under its task of support for the State public authorities, the local authorities and any natural or legal person, will insure training, awareness and assistance upon prevention and risk detection. Under its task of disseminating information to prevent and detect corruption cases, the AFA will contribute, through its cooperation actions and its tasks of support and technical assistance, to enforce the international commitments of French Authorities.

Composition. The AFA includes control and expertise units, a Strategic Committee responsible for providing the overall policy and an Enforcement Committee (Article 2).

Procedure. When someone fails to comply with the duty to implement a prevention and detection system against corruption, the AFA Director will communicate an inspection report to the defendant and give him notice to present written observations. Afterwards, the Director will be able to issue a warning or submit a complaint to the Enforcement Committee, which has equal gender representation. He will also communicate the inspection report, observations, his opinion as to the facts and the sanction that he deems appropriate. The defendant will be given information on the charges against him. The Enforcement Committee will appoint a Rapporteur in charge of investigating the facts in an adversarial manner. The Defendant, who can be assisted by counsel of his choice, will receive the Director’s opinion and will be able to address observations. After two months, the Defendant will be summoned to a public hearing (except when this could interfere with public order, business secrecy or any other legally-protected secrets) during which he will be able to present oral observations, responding the Director representative’s observations (Article 5).

Judges and category A civil servants, who are part of the control and expertise unit “should present their accreditation cards when they conduct onsite controls, which can only be done within business premises, or within private individuals’ home, and need to take place during business hours, after informing the representative of the controlled entity that he can be assisted by any person of his choice” (Article 7).

Conflicts of interest and recusal. Article 6 and 8 address conflicts of interest between members of the Control and Expertise units and the ones from the Enforcement Committee, and the recusal of those persons.

Publication of the administrative decision on the French Anticorruption Agency

Additional subdirectorates of the AFA. Pursuant to the terms of the administrative decision of March 14, 2017 on the organization of the AFA, the AFA “includes, in addition to the Enforcement Committee and the Strategic Committee, the Advisory, Strategic Analysis and International Affairs Subdirectorate, the Control Subdirectorate and the General Secretariat” (Article 1).

The Advisory, Strategic Analysis and International Affairs Subdirectorate. The Advisory, Strategic Analysis and International Affairs Subdirectorate is in charge of the centralization, outreach of information and good practices, and of the development of recommendations to assist companies which must implement a corruption or influence-peddling risks prevention and detection system (Article 2).

The Control Subdirectorate. The Control Subdirectorate conducts off-site and on-site verifications of the implementation of compliance measures (code of conduct, whistleblower mechanism, risk mapping, evaluating procedures of clients, first rank providers and intermediaries’ situation regarding risk mapping, internal or external accounting control procedures, training arrangements for executives and personnel most exposed to the risk of corruption and influence peddling, disciplinary regime, internal framework for controlling implemented measures). It monitors the execution of decisions taken by the Sanctions Commission and controls the execution of the sentence to implement a compliance program. It is tasked with controlling the adequacy of measures regarding the prevention and detection of corruption and compliance measures put in place. It can issue recommendations for the purpose of improving existing procedures (Article 3).

Related content

Press review
12 April 2024
Press review – Week of 8 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the Panama Papers trial which opened on Monday, 8 April, the decision rendered against...
Press review
5 April 2024
Press review – Week of 1 April 2024
This week, the press review covers the conviction by the American justice system of the crypto assets platform FTX‘s former...
Press review
29 March 2024
Press review – Week of 25 March 2024
This week, the press review covers the opening of proceedings against Google, Apple and Meta by the European Commission for...
Press review
22 March 2024
Press review – Week of 18 March 2024
This week, the press review covers the report of the French Court of Auditors on the financial situation of the...
Press review
15 March 2024
Press review – Week of 11 March 2024
This week’s press review covers the implementation by the AMF of two guidelines issued by the European Banking Authority, the...
Press review
8 March 2024
Press review – Week of 4 March 2024
This week’s press review covers the conviction of Apple to a 1.8 billion euros fine by the European Commission for...
Press review
1 March 2024
Press review – Week of 26 February 2024
This week’s press review covers Washington's adoption of new sanctions against Russia, the involvement of a French municipal agent in...
Press review
23 February 2024
Press review – Week of 19 February 2024
This week’s press review covers Donald Trump and his sons’ conviction for fraud in New York, the decision of Paris...
Analysis
22 February 2024
New clarifications on the repression of tax fraud offences and tax fraud laundering by the...
On 13 December 2023, the Cour de cassation first ruled on the concept of non bis in idem, rejecting the...
Analysis
20 February 2024
A French dairy group suspected of tax fraud
Since 2018, Lactalis has been suspected of committing tax fraud and laundering the proceeds of such fraud via schemes involving...
Press review
16 February 2024
Press review – Week of 12 February 2024
This week’s press review looks back at the legacy of former French minister of Justice Robert Badinter who recently passed...
Press review
9 February 2024
Press review – Week of 5 February 2024
This week’s press review highlights the acquittal of former minister and mayor of Pau, François Bayrou, the accusation of a...