Analysis
14 July 2021

The Bolloré case and the risks attached to the French Individual Guilty Pleas

Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Enforcement & Court Decisions

 

French criminal law does not have a very long-standing tradition of negotiated justice. Negotiated justice in France first appeared with a form of guilty plea known as Comparution sur Reconnaissance Préalable de Culpabilité or “CRPC” introduced in 2004 for minor offenses[i] and then extended in 2011 to more serious offences, including white-collar crime[ii].

The CRPC procedure is applicable to both natural and legal persons and enables a defendant to agree to an offer from the prosecutor for a reduced sentence in exchange for an admission of guilt[iii].

Once the prosecutor and the defendant agree on a sentence, the CRPC agreement has to be homologated by a Judge to come into effect. However, the homologation Judge may refuse to do so, in particular if he finds that the nature of the facts, the personality of the defendant, the situation of the victim or the general interests of society justify that a public trial should be held[iv].

In addition to this procedure, a new form of negotiated justice, the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (“Convention Judiciaire d’intérêt public” or “CJIP”) was implemented in 2016 by the Sapin II Law for legal persons accused of corruption, influence peddling, or tax offense[v].

The CJIP does not apply to natural persons[vi]. In this regard, the French Criminal Procedure Code expressly states that when a CJIP is signed by a legal person the legal representatives of the accused legal person remain liable as natural persons[vii].

Therefore, when both a legal person and an individual are prosecuted in the same case, the former may engage in a CJIP, while the later may engage in a CRPC[viii].

However, a recent case of 26 February 2021[ix], highlights the risk attached to the CRPC procedure conducted in parallel with a CJIP. In this case, following a French investigation regarding public procurement contracts in Togo[x], Mr. Vincent Bolloré, one of the richest businessmen in France, and the company Bolloré SE, decided to settle this investigation with the French prosecuting authorities.

Bolloré SE signed a CJIP and did not admit to any wrongdoing but agreed to pay a €12‑million fine and set up a compliance program[xi]. Vincent Bolloré, for his part and in the context of a CRPC, admitted to wrongdoing and acknowledged his guilt, in exchange for a sentence limited to a €375,000 fine. However, Vincent Bolloré had his CRPC agreement refused by the homologation Judge during the public hearing[xii]. According to the journalists who attended this public homologation hearing, the Homologation Judge stated that Vincent Bollore’s was not going to be granted a CRPC, because his conduct had “seriously undermined public economic order” and “undermined Togo’s sovereignty” and that he should therefore be held accountable in a public trial[xiii].

This refusal was unexpected. Indeed, Vincent Bolloré’s attorneys had negotiated with the French national financial prosecutor (“parquet national financier” or “PNF”) to settle this case.

The Bolloré case shows that the homologation of a CRPC by the Judge is not automatically granted. The judge can refuse to homologate the CRPC on a discretionary basis, without the possibility of an appeal against this decision of non-homologation by the defendant[xiv]. This is not the first instance where a CRPC was rejected in a high-profile case. In 2017, a French member of Parliament had negotiated with the Paris prosecutor for a CRPC to settle allegations of money laundering and violation of financial reporting requirements. The judge refused the homologation indicating that the sentence was “unsuitable in view of the circumstances of the offence and the personality of the perpetrator” who was a “representative of the Nation”[xv]. It seems that the risk that a guilty plea will not be accepted is increased for high‑profile individuals or where public interests may be involved. Whilst French law provides for a possibility to appeal an homologated CRPC, it does not provide for such a mechanism when the homologation is refused. In that respect, the French Constitutional Supreme Court recently confirmed that the absence of an appeal mechanism for a homologation refusal was not contrary to the Constitution and the right to an effective remedy [xvi].

Finally, the Bolloré case raises the question of whether an individual who has admitted guilt in the context of an unsuccessful CRPC and in whose case a CJIP is signed with a legal entity, can receive a fair trial during the subsequent proceeding. Indeed, if the Criminal Procedure Code states that the public prosecutor and the parties may not refer to statements made or documents handed over during the CRPC procedure before the future investigating or trial court[xvii], media reports of the defendant’s admission of guilt may impair the ability of the Judge in charge of the continuation of the case to be impartial[xvii].

Related content

Analysis
CumEx files
13 January 2022
CumEx files, from tax optimization to tax fraud ?
A look back at the revelations of the "CumEx files" and key take aways on these practices of tax optimization by dividend arbitrage that may soon be qualified as tax frau...
David Duran Hernandez
Trainee lawyer
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Pierre Calderan
Associate Navacelle
Alexandre Coudreau
Student Sciences Po
Analysis
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) is off to an active and promising start
11 January 2022
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) is off to an active and promising start
An analysis of the beginnings of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and review of its investigations and first successes, including its first conviction in Novembe...
Pauline Bomm
Trainee lawyer
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Laura Ragazzi
Associate Navacelle
Analysis
LVMH concludes a CJIP
31 December 2021
LVMH concludes a CJIP and escapes prosecution in the “Squarcini case”
Navacelle covers the CJIP signed on December17th, 2021 by LVMH. The French company was involved in acts of influence peddling implicating a former consultant, Mr. Bernard...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Laura Ragazzi
Associate Navacelle
Alexandre Coudreau
Student Sciences Po
Analysis
28 December 2021
OECD Convention on Combating Bribery in France Phase 4
On 9 December 2021, the OECD adopted its Phase 4 report on France’s implementation of the Convention and the 2009 Recommendation of the Council on Combating Bribery of ...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Nicolas Maia
Associate Navacelle
Alexandre Desevedavy
Trainee lawyer
Analysis
16 December 2021
Corruption: The White House strategy
On December 6th, the Biden-Harris administration unveiled its strategy to counter corruption, established as a core United States national security interest. On the agend...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Pierre Calderan
Associate Navacelle
Alexandre Desevedavy
Trainee lawyer
Analysis
15 December 2021
Illegal banking solicitation and laundering of aggravated tax fraud : new step in the UBS file
The long-awaited judgment in the UBS case was delivered by the Paris Court of Appeal. The historic penalty of € 4.5 billion gives way to a more measured sanction, and t...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Nicolas Maia
Associate Navacelle
Alexandre Coudreau
Student Sciences Po
Analysis
1 December 2021
CJIP concluded between JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and the Financial Public Prosecutor
A new example of the use of negotiated justice in criminal tax law in France. On 26 August 2021, a fourth Convention Judiciaire d’Intérêt Public (“CJIP”) was con...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Nicolas Maia
Associate Navacelle
Laura Ragazzi
Associate Navacelle
Analysis
17 November 2021
Ericsson’s violation of the terms of its Deferred Prosecution Agreement concluded with the Department of Justice a...
On 22 October 2021, Ericsson indicated that it received correspondence from the US Department of Justice (DoJ) accusing the group, by failing to disclose certain document...
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Pierre Calderan
Associate Navacelle
Nicolas Maia
Associate Navacelle
News
GIR 100 Navacelle
10 November 2021
Navacelle identified in GIR 100 2021
Navacelle identified as the French independent leading crossborder investigations practice by Global Investigations Review (GIR).
News
U.S. announces tougher approach of the Department of Justice in the fight against economic crime
4 November 2021
U.S. announces tougher approach of the Department of Justice in the fight against economic crime
Navacelle team highlights the review of the U.S. Department of Justice's (“DoJ”) policies in the fight against economic crime.
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Nicolas Maia
Associate Navacelle
Salomé Garnier
Associate Navacelle
Events
The development of internal investigations and compliance under US influence
28 October 2021
The development of internal investigations and compliance under US influence (In french)
Julie Zorrilla was at Sciences Po to talk about the development of internal investigations and compliance under US influence with Marie de Boynes & Stéphane de Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
News
27 September 2021
Update of French Financial Market Regulator (AMF) of its control charters (in French)
This update specifies the procedures for carrying out control missions, the principles of good conduct followed by those in charge of a control as well as the behavior ex...