Analysis
14 July 2022

Lobbying: Declaration obligations of interest representatives in France

Highlight on the disclosure obligations imposed on interest representatives in France, as provided for by Law 2013-907 of October 11, 2013, as amended by Law 2016-1691 of December 9, 2016, on transparency, the fight against corruption and the modernization of economic life, as well as the possible penalties for failure to comply with these obligations.

 

I. 2013-907 of October 11, 2013, defines what constitutes an interest representative in France

 The law of October 11, 2013, amended by law n°2016-1691 of December 9, 2016, defines the status of interest representative and grants legal recognition to his activity.

Are considered as interest representatives, the private legal entities, the public establishments or public groups exercising an industrial and commercial activity, the chambers of commerce and industry, the chambers of trades and crafts and the chambers of agriculture of which a director, an employee or a member has, as a principal or regular activity, to influence the public decision.[1]

The influence on the public decision can be exercised in particular on the content of a law or a regulatory act and through contact with several persons listed by the law, such as members of the government, deputies or senators or the President of the Republic’s staff.[2]

 

II. Law no. 2013-907 of October 11, 2013 and Decree no. 2017-867 of May 9, 2017 specify the obligations applicable to interest representatives as well as the penalties for failure to comply

Interest representatives must register and declare their activities in a public register available online on the HATVP website[3]. This public register allows any person to obtain the list of interest representatives free of charge.[4]

This registration must be made within two months of the date on which they meet the conditions to be considered as interest representatives.[5] Interest representatives must provide much information about their activity, such as their identity, or the actions carried out in the framework of their activities.[6]

In addition, any change in this information must be communicated to the HATVP within one month.[7]

Moreover, the text specifies that any person who acts as an interest representative on behalf of a third party must also communicate his or her activity to the HATVP.[8]

Finally, interest representatives must also send the HATVP, within three months of the end of their fiscal year, details of the actions they carry out, the expenses related to their activity or the number of people they employ in the exercise of their activities.[9]

To encourage interest representatives to declare themselves to the HATVP, the law provides that failure to comply with the declaration obligations exposes the representative to a criminal penalty.[10]

The HATVP is the competent authority to establish breaches of the rules governing the declaration of interest representatives.[11] It may thus choose to send a formal notice to the interest representatives concerned, which it may make public, to comply with their obligations in this area.[12]

 

Related content

Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Publication
29 August 2024
LIR 7th Edition : Focus on third-party evaluation, a challenging due diligence measure for French companies
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' seventh edition, focusing on third-party evaluation, a challenging due diligence measure for French...
Press review
1 November 2024
Press review – Week of 28 October 2024
This week’s press review covers on BNP Paribas’ conviction to compensate a fake bank advisor fraud victim, ESMA’s report positioning...
Press review
25 October 2024
Press review – Week of 21 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the dismissal of the investigation into laundering of tax fraud money the Mulliez Group, the...
Press review
18 October 2024
Press review – Week of 14 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the failure of around a quarter of France’s major companies to comply with their obligation...
Press review
11 October 2024
Press review – Week of 7 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the corruption indictment of the mayor of New York, the investigation into the embezzlement of...
Press review
4 October 2024
Press review – Week of 30 September 2024
This week’s press review covers the financial fraud perpetrated against the Kiabi brand, the opening of the RN’s European parliamentary...
Publication
1 October 2024
Novelty in the transfer of criminal liability from the absorbed company to the absorbing company
Following a merger, the criminal liability of the company being absorbed is transferred to the acquiring company, now regardless of...
Press review
Press review - Week of 23 September 2024
27 September 2024
Press review – Week of 23 September 2024
This week’s press review covers the follow-up to the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (“CJIP”) with Nestlé, and notably the two...
Analysis
20 September 2024
Look back at the CJIP concluded between Danske Bank and the French National financial prosecutor’s...
Danske Bank was charged with tax fraud laundering which occurred between 2007 and 2014 due to the lack of effectiveness...
Press review
20 September 2024
Press review – Week of 16 September 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the new obligation to relinquish seized assets in CJIP introduced by Law 2024-582, the...
Press review
13 September 2024
Press review – Week of 9 September 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the trial of eight members of the military for corruption and favoritism before the...
Event
12 September 2024
Future prospects for International Anti-Corruption Court
Look back at the roundtable held on 13 June 2024 at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), in...