Analysis
14 July 2022

Lobbying: Declaration obligations of interest representatives in France

Highlight on the disclosure obligations imposed on interest representatives in France, as provided for by Law 2013-907 of October 11, 2013, as amended by Law 2016-1691 of December 9, 2016, on transparency, the fight against corruption and the modernization of economic life, as well as the possible penalties for failure to comply with these obligations.

 

I. 2013-907 of October 11, 2013, defines what constitutes an interest representative in France

 The law of October 11, 2013, amended by law n°2016-1691 of December 9, 2016, defines the status of interest representative and grants legal recognition to his activity.

Are considered as interest representatives, the private legal entities, the public establishments or public groups exercising an industrial and commercial activity, the chambers of commerce and industry, the chambers of trades and crafts and the chambers of agriculture of which a director, an employee or a member has, as a principal or regular activity, to influence the public decision.[1]

The influence on the public decision can be exercised in particular on the content of a law or a regulatory act and through contact with several persons listed by the law, such as members of the government, deputies or senators or the President of the Republic’s staff.[2]

 

II. Law no. 2013-907 of October 11, 2013 and Decree no. 2017-867 of May 9, 2017 specify the obligations applicable to interest representatives as well as the penalties for failure to comply

Interest representatives must register and declare their activities in a public register available online on the HATVP website[3]. This public register allows any person to obtain the list of interest representatives free of charge.[4]

This registration must be made within two months of the date on which they meet the conditions to be considered as interest representatives.[5] Interest representatives must provide much information about their activity, such as their identity, or the actions carried out in the framework of their activities.[6]

In addition, any change in this information must be communicated to the HATVP within one month.[7]

Moreover, the text specifies that any person who acts as an interest representative on behalf of a third party must also communicate his or her activity to the HATVP.[8]

Finally, interest representatives must also send the HATVP, within three months of the end of their fiscal year, details of the actions they carry out, the expenses related to their activity or the number of people they employ in the exercise of their activities.[9]

To encourage interest representatives to declare themselves to the HATVP, the law provides that failure to comply with the declaration obligations exposes the representative to a criminal penalty.[10]

The HATVP is the competent authority to establish breaches of the rules governing the declaration of interest representatives.[11] It may thus choose to send a formal notice to the interest representatives concerned, which it may make public, to comply with their obligations in this area.[12]

 

Related content

Publication
23 January 2025
LIR 8th Edition : Focus on a French Financial Markets Authority’s fine for price manipulation...
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' eighth edition, focusing on a French Financial Markets Authority's sanction against a fund...
Publication
15 November 2024
Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations (2025) – GIR
NAVACELLE co-author of the ninth edition of Global Investigations Review’s Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations.
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
14 February 2025
Press review – Week of 10 February 2025
This week’s press review covers the upcoming summons of the mayor of Fréjus for illegal interest taking, the CJIP (French...
Press review
7 February 2025
Press review – Week of 3 February 2025
This week’s press review covers offences against environment, especially the trial against Nestlé company, an investigation in Guinea on pollution...
Press review
31 January 2025
Press review – Week of 27 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the Ministry of Justice's order to pay damages to two members of the PNF, the...
Event
27 January 2025
The internationalisation of whistleblowing: ensuring compliance within a global framework
A webinar organised by EQS on 28 January 2025 built for international compliance actors.
Press review
24 January 2025
Press review – Week of 20 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the CNIL's publication of its 2025-2028 strategic plan, the ACPR’s intensification of its fight against...
Press review
17 January 2025
Press review – Week of 13 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the investigation launched against the current French Minister of Transport for misappropriation of public funds,...
Event
10 January 2025
Are companies accountable in court? Between legality and activism
A panel organized on 10 January 2025, during the AIJA 2025 Francophone Conference in Geneva.
Press review
10 January 2025
Press review – Week of 6 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the trial on suspicion of Libyan funding of Nicolas Sarkozy’s election campaign, the creation of...
Analysis
6 January 2025
A look back at the last CJIP of 2024: Areva SA and Orano Mining SAS
On 9 December 2024, the Paris Judicial Court approved the CJIP (French DPA) concluded between Areva SA and Orano Mining...
Analysis
23 December 2024
Lessons from the analysis of first-instance court decisions on probity offenses by the French Anti-Corruption...
The French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) published an analytical note on 9 December 2024, regarding the prosecution of probity offenses, based...
Press review
20 December 2024
Press review – Week of 16 December 2024
This week’s press review covers Nicolas Sarkozy’s definitive three-year prison sentence for corruption in the wiretapping case, corruption holding back...