Lobbying: Declaration obligations of interest representatives in France
Highlight on the disclosure obligations imposed on interest representatives in France, as provided for by Law 2013-907 of October 11, 2013, as amended by Law 2016-1691 of December 9, 2016, on transparency, the fight against corruption and the modernization of economic life, as well as the possible penalties for failure to comply with these obligations.
I. 2013-907 of October 11, 2013, defines what constitutes an interest representative in France
The law of October 11, 2013, amended by law n°2016-1691 of December 9, 2016, defines the status of interest representative and grants legal recognition to his activity.
Are considered as interest representatives, the private legal entities, the public establishments or public groups exercising an industrial and commercial activity, the chambers of commerce and industry, the chambers of trades and crafts and the chambers of agriculture of which a director, an employee or a member has, as a principal or regular activity, to influence the public decision.[1]
The influence on the public decision can be exercised in particular on the content of a law or a regulatory act and through contact with several persons listed by the law, such as members of the government, deputies or senators or the President of the Republic’s staff.[2]
II. Law no. 2013-907 of October 11, 2013 and Decree no. 2017-867 of May 9, 2017 specify the obligations applicable to interest representatives as well as the penalties for failure to comply
Interest representatives must register and declare their activities in a public register available online on the HATVP website[3]. This public register allows any person to obtain the list of interest representatives free of charge.[4]
This registration must be made within two months of the date on which they meet the conditions to be considered as interest representatives.[5] Interest representatives must provide much information about their activity, such as their identity, or the actions carried out in the framework of their activities.[6]
In addition, any change in this information must be communicated to the HATVP within one month.[7]
Moreover, the text specifies that any person who acts as an interest representative on behalf of a third party must also communicate his or her activity to the HATVP.[8]
Finally, interest representatives must also send the HATVP, within three months of the end of their fiscal year, details of the actions they carry out, the expenses related to their activity or the number of people they employ in the exercise of their activities.[9]
To encourage interest representatives to declare themselves to the HATVP, the law provides that failure to comply with the declaration obligations exposes the representative to a criminal penalty.[10]
The HATVP is the competent authority to establish breaches of the rules governing the declaration of interest representatives.[11] It may thus choose to send a formal notice to the interest representatives concerned, which it may make public, to comply with their obligations in this area.[12]
Related content
Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
20 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 16 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) praising Monaco’s progress in combating money laundering, the dismissal...
Publication
19 February 2026
Assessing the fight against corruption: modalities and effectiveness of international peer review mechanisms
Revue internationale de la compliance et de l’éthique des affaires recently published an article co-authored by Vincent Filhol and Caroline...
Press review
13 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 9 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the requirement to provide grounds when extending pre-trial detention; the opening by the French National...
News
10 February 2026
Key Findings from the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index
Transparency International has released the CPI for 2025, which highlights limited progress and persistent setbacks in the fight against corruption,...
EventNews
9 February 2026
The evolution of the FCPA and changes in anti-corruption enforcement in a changing geopolitical landscape
The IBA Anti-Corruption Asia Conference in Tokyo provided a rich forum for discussion on the evolution of the FCPA and...
Press review
6 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 2 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the prosecution’s submissions in the appeal trial of Marine Le Pen, a Cour de cassation...
Event
5 February 2026
Focus on French Compliance regulators
A conference for ESMD on French Compliance regulators' roles and tools, as well as interactions with judicial authorities and a...
Press review
30 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 26 January 2026
This week’s press review covers the opening of the appeal trial of four individuals convicted for their involvement in the...
Press review
23 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 19 January 2026
This week’s press review covers Free’s conviction by the CNIL for serious breaches of the GDPR’s security requirements; the French...
Press review
16 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 12 January 2026
This week’s press review covers the judicial public interest agreement entered into by HSBC in connection with dividend-related tax fraud...
Analysis
12 January 2026
Clarifications on attorney-client privilege and the prerogatives of the judicial judge in tax matters
In a ruling dated 8 October 2025, the French Court of Cassation clarified the scope of attorney-client privilege, the judge’s...
We use cookies to optimize our website and our services.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Préférences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.