21 November 2022

Judicial Agreement of Public Interest for aggravated tax fraud laundering and illegal canvassing

Credit Suisse escapes prosecution and agrees to pay a public interest fine of 123,000,000 euros under the 13th deferred prosecution agreement concluded by the National and Financial Prosecutor's Office.


On October 21, 2022, the National and Financial Prosecutor’s Office (“PNF”) concluded its thirteenth Judicial Agreement of Public Interest (“CJIP”), the sixth in the field of tax offenses.

This agreement, approved by the President of the Paris Judicial Court on October 24, 2022, provides for the payment by the Swiss bank of a public interest fine of 123,000,000 euros for illegal canvassing[1] carried out by the Swiss bank’s sales representatives on French territory and for tax fraud laundering[2] due to the concealment of assets held by French taxpayers from the French Public Treasury. It also stipulates that Crédit Suisse must pay 115,000,000 euros in compensation to the French Public Treasury for the damage suffered by the French State as a result of the undeclared amounts.


I. Facts

This agreement stems from a preliminary investigation opened by the PNF in April 2016 following the receipt by the PNF, as part of a mutual assistance agreement, of a list of thousands of names of French taxpayers who held bank accounts with Credit Suisse.

The information thus communicated referred to “an organized system of assistance to tax evasion and money laundering” set up by Credit Suisse, in particular through the canvassing of French clients by Swiss sales representatives.

The PNF considered that the investigations allowed it to determine that the assets concealed from the French Public Treasury represented 2 billion euros held by 4,999 French clients with bank accounts at Crédit Suisse.

It was indicated that the investigation had also highlighted that the bank accounts of these French clients were denominated “RET”, in order to indicate that no documents (e.g. bank statements) were to be communicated to their holders in France, so that the banking documentation remained on Swiss territory, unless expressly requested by the client.

Finally, the PNF noted that the investigations had made it possible to identify the presence of unauthorized sales representatives on French territory who made discreet home visits in order to meet future clients, as well as the use of intermediaries to set up off-shore structures.

The PNF therefore considered that this constituted aggravated laundering of tax fraud and illegal canvassing.


II. The public interest fine

Without admitting the facts, Crédit Suisse agreed, through this CJIP, to pay, in addition to the compensation of the French Public Treasury of 115,000,000 euros, the sum of 123,000,000 euros as a public interest fine.

It should be recalled that the French Criminal Code provides for a maximum fine of 750,000 euros for the offence of aggravated tax fraud laundering[3] and a maximum fine of 375,000 euros for illegal canvassing.[4] However, with regard to aggravated tax fraud, Article 324-3 of the French Criminal Code provides that the fine may amount to half the value of the property to which the laundering related. In 2019, the Court of Cassation also specified that the calculation method corresponded to the amount of the evaded duties and not to the amount of the concealed assets.[5] This calculation method was confirmed by the Paris Court of Appeal in the UBS case for facts similar to those of the present case.[6]

Article 41-1-1 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure provides that the public interest fine is determined based on the benefit derived from the offence and may reach up to 30% of the average annual turnover over the last three years; thus, in this case, the fine could be 6,377,000,000 euros.

In the context of this CJIP, the method for calculating the public interest fine is not detailed, but the PNF specifies that out of the 123,000,000 euros:

  • 65,600,000 euros represent the profits from the offences;
  • And 57,400,000 are part of an additional fine justified by the habitual nature of the acts and their duration.

It is further specified that the calculation of the fine also takes into account minor factors, such as the cooperation of Credit Suisse in the investigations, the age of the facts, the corrective measures taken by the bank and the indemnification of the tax authorities.

Once again, the fine approved by the Judicial Court, which may seem moderate in relation to the limit set by the law, the proceeds of the offence and the turnover of the Swiss bank, nevertheless demonstrates the effectiveness of the CJIP mechanism, which allows the tax authorities to recover, undoubtedly more quickly than through prosecution and the courts, significant amounts of money.


Related content

Press review
Press review
29 September 2023
Press review – Week of 25 September 2023
This week, let's look back at the French Constitutional Council decision repealing an article of the French Criminal Procedure Code...
Press review
Press review
22 September 2023
Press review – Week of 18 September 2023
This week, the Navacelle press review looks back at the adoption of the eighth version of the European Administrative Cooperation...
Press review
press review
15 September 2023
Press review – Week of 11 September 2023
This week, the Navacelle press review looks back at the decision of a Brazilian Supreme Court judge to overturn the...
Press review
Press review
8 September 2023
Press review – Week of 4 September 2023
This week, the Navacelle press review discusses the guide published by the European Commission for EU operators on the best...
Bastille day newsletter 2023
14 July 2023
Bastille Day Newsletter 2023
On this 14th of July, lawyers at Navacelle offer you, as it does every year, a selection of noticeable events...
Judicial public interest agreements (CJIP)
13 July 2023
[Infography] Focus on Judicial public interest agreements (CJIP)
Since its creation by the Sapin II law of 9 December 2016, the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (“Convention Judiciaire d’Intérêt...
13 July 2023
The French Supreme Court confirms in its decision “La Chaufferie de La Défense” that the...
In a decision dated 9 November 2022, the criminal chamber of the French Supreme Court confirmed its case law on...
13 July 2023
Clarification of the ne bis in idem principle under European Union law with regard to...
On 22 March 2023, the criminal division of the French Court of Cassation has issued a ruling by which it...
13 July 2023
Review of the French National Financial Prosecutor’s Office activity
The French National Financial Prosecutor’s Office (“Parquet National Financier”) published its annual report of its activities for 2022, in which...
Press review
press review
7 July 2023
Press review – Week of 2 July 2023
The press review highlights the 209 million euros fine imposed on TechnipFMC, for acts of corruption in Africa in exchange...
Press review
Press review
30 June 2023
Press review – Week of 26 June 2023
This week's press review presents the decision by the Cour de cassation to initiate a review of the trial of...
Press review
Press review
23 June 2023
Press review – Week of 19 June 2023
This week's press review looks at the European Union's accession to the Istanbul Convention on combating domestic violence and violence...