The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and TRACFIN signed a working arrangement for closer cooperation
In accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation between Member States and with the European Union's institutions, provided for in Article 4 of the TEU, the European Public Prosecutor's Office and TRACFIN concluded a working arrangement on 26 October 2023 in order to facilitate cooperation between them and the mutual exchange of information to fight more efficiently against fraud to the Union's financial interests.
On 26 October 2023, TRACFIN, the French financial intelligence unit responsible for the fight against clandestine financial circuits, money laundering and the financing of terrorism,[1] and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereinafter the “EPPO”), the independent public prosecutor’s office of the European Union responsible for investigating, prosecuting and bringing to judgment crimes against the financial interests of the European Union,[2] entered into a working arrangement (hereinafter the “Working Arrangement”).
The purpose of this Working Arrangement, which entered into force on the day it was signed,[3] is to provide a structured and operational framework for facilitating cooperation between the EPPO and TRACFIN (I), and to facilitate the exchange of information between them as well as streamline the analytical support that TRACFIN can provide to the EPPO (II).[4]
I. The Working Arrangement is part of a cooperative approach, key to the proper functioning of TRACFIN and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office
Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 of 12 October 2017 (hereinafter the “Regulation”), which created the EPPO, made cooperation one of the key principles of its functioning and operations. This principle is, moreover, at the origin of its creation as it is the result of the implementation of the legislative procedure of enhanced cooperation by several Member States.[5]
Based on the principle of sincere cooperation set out in Article 4 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),[6] the recitals of the Regulation provide that the EPPO on the one hand and the competent national authorities[7] and the relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union such as Eurojust, Europol and OLAF[8] on the other support each other in their investigations and prosecutions and inform each other.
In line with this objective, the Regulation provides, for example, that the competent national authorities shall actively assist and support the investigations and prosecutions of the EPPO[9] and inform it of investigations in respect of which the EPPO could exercise its competence, as well as, like the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, of criminal conduct in respect of which the EPPO could also exercise its jurisdiction.[10] It adds that, conversely, the EPPO shall inform the competent national authorities of potential criminal offences outside of its scope of competence.[11]
In addition, the Regulation states that the EPPO may establish and maintain cooperative relations with institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, national authorities of Member States not participating in enhanced cooperation or of third countries and international organizations, as well as exchanging information directly with them. To this end, the Regulation provides that the EPPO may conclude working arrangements.[12]
Pursuant to this prerogative, the EPPO has entered into numerous working arrangements, not only with Europol, Eurojust and OLAF, but also with national authorities such as the Hungarian and Albanian Public Prosecutor’s Offices and the National Antimafia and Counter Terrorism Directorate of Italy, in addition to the recent agreement with TRACFIN.
II. The Working Arrangement establishes a privileged communication framework between TRACFIN and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office
The main purpose of the Working Arrangement is to formalize several channels for exchanging information between TRACFIN and the EPPO, in addition to those already provided for by the Regulation and the Monetary and Financial Code, to make communication between them more secure, efficient and smooth and thus make the fight against crimes against the European Union’s economic interests more effective.[13]
However, it introduces safeguards by specifying that the information and documents communicated will be confidential and covered by professional secrecy, and that they may not be transferred to a third party, in a context other than that for which they were originally provided, without the consent of the party disclosing them.[14]
A. TRACFIN can provide analytical support to the European Public Prosecutor’s Office
The Working Arrangement provides that the EPPO may request, by means of a motivated and contextualized act,[15] information and documents from TRACFIN regarding suspicious transactions or activities, as well as the result of a specific analysis relevant to its activity.[16]
TRACFIN may refuse to answer such a request, duly justifying its decision, if there are objective reasons to believe that an answer would have a negative impact on ongoing investigations or analyses or, in exceptional circumstances, if it would be manifestly disproportionate in relation to the legitimate interests of a natural or legal person or would not be relevant to the intended purposes.[17]
However, if TRACFIN agrees to answer such a request, it must do so in a timely manner and provide all the relevant information at its disposal, including information obtained from financial intelligence units in other Member States, provided it has obtained their prior consent.[18] If the information requested is connected to an investigation carried out by a national judicial authority or investigative authority, TRACFIN must inform that authority if the request comes from the EPPO and vice versa, unless the said authority or the EPPO request not to do so.[19]
The EPPO must be careful to protect the confidentiality of the information it receives and not disclose or forward it to other authorities without TRACFIN’s authorization and must use it only for the purposes for which it was requested, subject to the possibility of reporting potentially criminal acts to judicial authorities.[20]
B. TRACFIN and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office can provide each other with information on their investigations
The Working Arrangement provides that European Delegated Prosecutors in France can transmit directly to TRACFIN any information collected during an investigation led by the EPPO and necessary for the accomplishment of its missions, pursuant to Article 561-27 of the Monetary and Financial Code, which already authorizes TRACFIN to receive such information from certain public authorities and to access certain public files.[21]
Similarly, it is provided that TRACFIN can transmit directly to the European Delegated Prosecutors in France any information collected during an investigation and necessary for the accomplishment of its missions, in application of articles 561-30-1 and 561-31 of the Monetary and Financial Code, which already authorize TRACFIN to inform the Public Prosecutor of potentially criminal conducts and to transmit information to certain public authorities, and of article 24(1) of the Regulation, which requires TRACFIN to report without undue delay to the EPPO any criminal conduct in respect of which it could exercise its competence.[22]
In addition, the Working Arrangement enables TRACFIN and the EPPO to exchange strategic and non-operational information, such as typologies and challenges, in areas within their competence.[23]
C. The European Public Prosecutor’s Office can inform TRACFIN of suspicious transactions that it considers should be suspended
Among the powers granted to TRACFIN is that of objecting to the execution of a transaction that has not yet been carried out or to any other transaction linked to the first, which then entails a postponement of the execution of these transactions and a possible provisional sequestration of the funds, accounts or securities concerned.[24]
In this respect, the Working Arrangement provides that the European Prosecutor or any European Delegated Prosecutor acting in France may inform TRACFIN of suspicious transactions or any other operations related to such transactions for which the EPPO considers, in the light of his investigations, that they should be suspended.[25]
TRACFIN must then inform the EPPO (i) if it denies the suspension of a suspicious transaction, (ii) if it knows that the suspicious transaction designated by the EPPO is connected to an investigation carried out by a national judicial authority, unless the latter request it not to do so, and (iii) if it intends to suspend a suspicious transaction at the request of a national authority and this transaction is connected to an investigation carried out by the EPPO.[26]
Related content
Press review
14 February 2025
Press review – Week of 10 February 2025
This week’s press review covers the upcoming summons of the mayor of Fréjus for illegal interest taking, the CJIP (French...
Press review
7 February 2025
Press review – Week of 3 February 2025
This week’s press review covers offences against environment, especially the trial against Nestlé company, an investigation in Guinea on pollution...
Press review
31 January 2025
Press review – Week of 27 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the Ministry of Justice's order to pay damages to two members of the PNF, the...
Press review
17 January 2025
Press review – Week of 13 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the investigation launched against the current French Minister of Transport for misappropriation of public funds,...
Press review
10 January 2025
Press review – Week of 6 January 2025
This week’s press review covers the trial on suspicion of Libyan funding of Nicolas Sarkozy’s election campaign, the creation of...
Analysis
23 December 2024
Lessons from the analysis of first-instance court decisions on probity offenses by the French Anti-Corruption...
The French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) published an analytical note on 9 December 2024, regarding the prosecution of probity offenses, based...
Press review
20 December 2024
Press review – Week of 16 December 2024
This week’s press review covers Nicolas Sarkozy’s definitive three-year prison sentence for corruption in the wiretapping case, corruption holding back...
Press review
13 December 2024
Press review – Week of 9 December 2024
This week’s press review covers the CJIP (DPA) concluded by Areva and Orano Mining for acts of corruption in Mongolia,...
Press review
6 December 2024
Press review – Week of 2 December 2024
This week’s press review covers the suspicions of favoritism at Caisse des Dépôts, the fine of 2,2 million euros for...
Press review
29 November 2024
Press review – Week of 25 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the report by the Council of Europe's Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) calling on...
Press review
22 November 2024
Press review – Week of 18 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the dismantling of a VAT fraud network in Europe, the opening of an investigation into...
Event
15 November 2024
Competition law and cross border internal investigation
A round-table discussion organised as part of the American Bar Association's Autumn Conference in London on 15 November 2024.
We use cookies to optimize our website and our services.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Préférences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.