On December 6th, the Biden-Harris administration unveiled its strategy to counter corruption, established as a core United States national security interest. On the agenda: strengthened anti-corruption and anti-money laundering regulations, new expectations for compliance programs, improved domestic and international cooperation, etc. Navacelle identifies the key elements of this global strategy that will definitely impact businesses worldwide and international cooperation.
Embodying President Joe Biden’s intent to establish the fight against corruption as a core U.S. national security interest[1], the Strategy’s objective is to enhance the United States’ ability to (i) prevent corruption, (ii) more effectively combat illicit finance and the laundering of proceeds of corrupt acts by international actors through domestic and international financial systems[2], (iii) better hold accountable those responsible of corrupts acts[3], and (iv) ensure a better management of foreign and transnational corruption risks.
To do so, five “mutually-reinforcing” pillars have been identified.[4]
I. A first pillar focused on modernizing, coordinating, and strengthening U.S. Government efforts to fight corruption
Seeking to uphold its global leadership in the fight against corruption, the United States wishes to deepen research, data collection and analysis on corruption and its actors in order to “map corruption networks” and “understand their dynamics”. Such an in-depth knowledge will then allow for better preventive measures in this field.[5]
The fight against corruption thereby becomes a cross-cutting priority for federal agencies and departments[6] who will benefit from substantial additional resources.
Cooperation and data exchange between national governments (local, state and Federal) and with international partners is equally called for. The United States intends to rely on international cooperation and its diplomatic partners to successfully tackle the fight against corruption.[7]
II. A second pillar focused on combatting illicit financing and laundering of the proceeds of corruption
As a major economic player, the United States intends to address deficiencies within existing anti-corruption and anti-laundering regulations[8]. To do so, a series of regulations will be implemented to promote beneficial ownership information collection and the transparency of real estate transactions[9], as well as to enhance scrutiny over “gatekeepers” of financial systems, such as lawyers, accountants or company and trust service providers.[10]
Pursuant to this strategy against money laundering, the Biden-Harris administration proposes to impose heavier penalties for those who participate in or contribute to money laundering operations.[11] The United States will also pursue cooperative efforts with other countries to strengthen their respective anti-money laundering frameworks and achieve greater transparency in the international financial system.[12]
III. A third pillar focused on holding corrupt actors accountable
The United States shall increase its efforts to prosecute foreign bribery cases[13] as well as to defend and protect members of the civil society and investigative journalists in the reporting of corruption activities.[14]
Additionally, the private sector, whether at the international or national level, is encouraged to implement better compliance programs[15] and partner countries are urged to take further initiatives in the identification of corrupt practices and in the fight against foreign corruption.[16]
To this end, the United States will launch an interagency initiative called Democracies Against Safe Havens Initiative, which will co-ordinate international action on this issue.[17] A kleptocracy asset recovery reward program will also be set up to ensure a better identification and an effective recovery of assets related to foreign government corruption that are held in U.S. financial institutions.[18]
IV. A fourth pillar focused on preserving and strengthening the multilateral anti-corruption architecture
The Biden-Harris administration wants to further engage in strengthening the international anti-corruption framework as established by the 1997 OECD Convention or by the 2003 Merida Convention[19] by taking multilateral initiatives with higher standards. The aim is to encourage foreign States to take real steps in the fight against corruption and to hold them accountable for any shortcomings.[20]
To this end, the U.S. will work with international organizations (G7, G20 OECD, NATO, etc.) to advocate for new anti-corruption measures.[21]
V. A fifth pillar focused on improving diplomatic engagement and leveraging foreign assistance resources to achieve anti-corruption policy goals
Seeing diplomatic relations and foreign assistance as crucial in the global fight against corruption[22], the White House is committed to prioritizing the fight against corruption in its diplomatic relations and the assistance of foreign states in this fight, as well as intergovernmental assistance on matters of transparency and accountability.[23]
To this end, the Biden-Harris administration will increase its support to the public sector in the fight against corruption, particularly for independent audit and oversight authorities.[24] Finally, the Biden-Harris administration also wishes to innovate and develop technological tools dedicated to the identification and the prevention of corruption[25] and will integrate anti-corruption considerations in military operations.[26]
Related content
Press review
6 December 2024
Press review – Week of 2 December 2024
This week’s press review covers the suspicions of favoritism at Caisse des Dépôts, the fine of 2,2 million euros for...
Press review
29 November 2024
Press review – Week of 25 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the report by the Council of Europe's Group of States against Corruption (GRECO) calling on...
Press review
22 November 2024
Press review – Week of 18 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the dismantling of a VAT fraud network in Europe, the opening of an investigation into...
Press review
15 November 2024
Press review – Week of 11 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the conviction of Marco Mouly for organizing his insolvency and the issue of an arrest...
Press review
8 November 2024
Press review – Week of 4 November 2024
This week’s press review covers the searches conducted in Paris and Amsterdam as part of the tax fraud allegations against...
Press review
1 November 2024
Press review – Week of 28 October 2024
This week’s press review covers BNP Paribas’ conviction to compensate a fake bank advisor fraud victim, ESMA’s report positioning the...
Press review
25 October 2024
Press review – Week of 21 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the dismissal of the investigation into laundering of tax fraud money the Mulliez Group, the...
Press review
18 October 2024
Press review – Week of 14 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the failure of around a quarter of France’s major companies to comply with their obligation...
Press review
11 October 2024
Press review – Week of 7 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the corruption indictment of the mayor of New York, the investigation into the embezzlement of...
Press review
4 October 2024
Press review – Week of 30 September 2024
This week’s press review covers the financial fraud perpetrated against the Kiabi brand, the opening of the RN’s European parliamentary...
Publication
1 October 2024
Transfer of the criminal liability of the acquired company in the context of a merger...
Following a merger, the criminal liability of the company being absorbed is transferred to the acquiring company, now regardless of...
Press review
27 September 2024
Press review – Week of 23 September 2024
This week’s press review covers the follow-up to the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (“CJIP”) with Nestlé, and notably the two...
We use cookies to optimize our website and our services.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Préférences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.