14 July 2017

Transposition of the EU’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates


The European Union’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (the Directive) came into force on 26th June 2015. Its aim was to prevent the use of the Union’s financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing. It required European member states to update their respective money laundering laws and “transpose” the new requirements into local law by 26th June 2017.

A key role was given to the principle of risk analysis and adequate safeguards. Among its main elements, the Directive required Member states to carry out a national risk assessment of their exposure to money laundering and terrorist financing and to maintain central registers on the beneficial ownership of corporations, reinforce the rules on Customer Due Diligence, widen the definition of Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) and include tax crimes as a predicate offence for money laundering.

The ordinance n°2016-1635 (the Ordinance) reinforcing the French anti-money laundering and terrorist financing dispositive was passed on December 1st, 2016 to transpose the Directive.

The prerogatives of the French Financial Intelligence Unit (Tracfin) have been widened. Tracfin’s right of communication with other obliged entities has been extended to entities which are not subject to anti-money laundering regulations. As an example, the right of communication now applies to the institution in charge of managing attorneys’ pecuniary settlements (CARPA). The Ordinance also allows Tracfin to transmit collected information to several administrative authorities and to foreign Financial Intelligence Units and reinforces Tracfin’s right to oppose any suspicious transaction not yet executed.

The Ordinance also imposes the obligation on companies and other legal entities to record their ultimate beneficial owners with the Companies Register. This register is notably accessible to Tracfin, customers, tax administration and professionals.

The scope of the anti-money laundering legislation has been widened by the inclusion of payment or virtual money institutions conducting business in France, authorized banking intermediaries, virtual money converting platforms, providers of gambling services (for transactions above €2000), traders of precious commodities accepting large cash payments and crowdfunding intermediaries.

Finally, the ordinance reinforces supervision schemes by imposing new obligations upon companies in terms of internal procedures and by implementing due diligence requirements. The ordinance also reinforces the range of sanctions which can be taken. The ACPR is now allowed to exercise control and take police measures. It may impose pecuniary sanctions (up to €100mn or 10% of the annual turnover). Sanctions may also be taken against individual directors or employees in charge of the anti-money laundering structure.

Related content

Lobbying : Declaration obligations of interest representatives in France
14 July 2022
Lobbying: Declaration obligations of interest representatives in France
Highlight on the disclosure obligations imposed on interest representatives in France, as provided for by Law 2013-907 of October 11, 2013, as amended by Law 2016-1691 of...
The Guide to Sanctions -GIR (2022)
10 July 2022
The Guide to Sanctions (2022) – GIR
Navacelle co-author of the third edition of the Global Investigation Review's Guide to Sanctions.
Press review
2 December 2022
Press review – Week of 28 November 2022
In this press review, you will discover several important judicial events: the French Supreme Court clarified the status of victim of an act of terrorism and the compensa...
Press review
Week of 21 November 2022
25 November 2022
Press review – Week of 21 November 2022
In this press review, you will discover the opening of a preliminary investigation by the French National Financial Prosecutor’s Office for misappropriation of public f...
Ifaci demain en main - vignette
24 November 2022
Roundtable – Allegations – Investigations : The edges of tomorrow
Stéphane de Navacelle will participate in IFACI's annual conference: "Demain en mains" on the theme "Allegations - Investigations : The edges of tomorrow ", Monday 28 No...
23 November 2022
The CJEU limits generalized data retention in surveillance
On 20 September 2022, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued two rulings concerning the conditions under which member states are allowed to retain traffic data...
21 November 2022
Judicial Agreement of Public Interest for aggravated tax fraud laundering and illegal canvassing
Credit Suisse escapes prosecution and agrees to pay a public interest fine of 123,000,000 euros under the 13th deferred prosecution agreement concluded by the National an...
Press review
Week of 14 November 2022
18 November 2022
Press review – Week of 14 November 2022
In this press review, you will find three significant events: the first conviction in France of a former Liberian rebel leader by the Paris criminal Court; the sanction o...
Autorité de la concurrence - Google
18 November 2022
Recent sanctions against Google by the French Competition Authority: ad servers and related rights
In 2021, the French Competition Authority imposed several fines on Google for anti-competitive practices related, on the one hand, to the remuneration of the related righ...
17 November 2022
Identification of the contractual actors of Compliance
Julie Zorrilla participated in the Colloque "Contract and compliance: the actors and their strategies" at the University of Nîmes.
17 November 2022
The cumulation of criminal and administrative sanctions in tax fraud
The judges of the Court of Cassation recently ruled on the cumulation of criminal and fiscal sanctions in tax fraud cases. This decision confirms the case law which permi...
16 November 2022
Cambridge Forum: Mutual legal assistance has gone rogue!
Why bother with MLATs when local law is global and prosecutors trade information on WhatsApp ?
Press review
Week of 7 November 2022
14 November 2022
Press review – Week of 7 November 2022
In this press review, you will find clarifications from the Court of Cassation on the legality of an extradition of an EU national to another Member State, even in the ab...
9 November 2022
Webinar: A comparative approach to professional secrecy and attorney-client privilege in criminal proceedings
Stéphane de Navacelle spokes at the Mondaq and Monfrini Bitton Klein webinar on "professional secrecy and attorney-client privilege in criminal proceedings".