Analysis
14 July 2017

Transposition of the EU’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The European Union’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (the Directive) came into force on 26th June 2015. Its aim was to prevent the use of the Union’s financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing. It required European member states to update their respective money laundering laws and “transpose” the new requirements into local law by 26th June 2017.

A key role was given to the principle of risk analysis and adequate safeguards. Among its main elements, the Directive required Member states to carry out a national risk assessment of their exposure to money laundering and terrorist financing and to maintain central registers on the beneficial ownership of corporations, reinforce the rules on Customer Due Diligence, widen the definition of Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) and include tax crimes as a predicate offence for money laundering.

The ordinance n°2016-1635 (the Ordinance) reinforcing the French anti-money laundering and terrorist financing dispositive was passed on December 1st, 2016 to transpose the Directive.

The prerogatives of the French Financial Intelligence Unit (Tracfin) have been widened. Tracfin’s right of communication with other obliged entities has been extended to entities which are not subject to anti-money laundering regulations. As an example, the right of communication now applies to the institution in charge of managing attorneys’ pecuniary settlements (CARPA). The Ordinance also allows Tracfin to transmit collected information to several administrative authorities and to foreign Financial Intelligence Units and reinforces Tracfin’s right to oppose any suspicious transaction not yet executed.

The Ordinance also imposes the obligation on companies and other legal entities to record their ultimate beneficial owners with the Companies Register. This register is notably accessible to Tracfin, customers, tax administration and professionals.

The scope of the anti-money laundering legislation has been widened by the inclusion of payment or virtual money institutions conducting business in France, authorized banking intermediaries, virtual money converting platforms, providers of gambling services (for transactions above €2000), traders of precious commodities accepting large cash payments and crowdfunding intermediaries.

Finally, the ordinance reinforces supervision schemes by imposing new obligations upon companies in terms of internal procedures and by implementing due diligence requirements. The ordinance also reinforces the range of sanctions which can be taken. The ACPR is now allowed to exercise control and take police measures. It may impose pecuniary sanctions (up to €100mn or 10% of the annual turnover). Sanctions may also be taken against individual directors or employees in charge of the anti-money laundering structure.

Related content

Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Press review
3 July 2026
Press Review – Week of 3 July 2026
This week, the press review looks at the searches conducted as part of an investigation into the misappropriation of European...
Press review
26 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 26 June 2026
This week, the press review looks at the search of the premises of the Altrad Group as part of a...
Publication
26 June 2026
The Court of Auditors’ report on anti-corruption policy: a strengthened legal framework facing operational limits
In an article published by the GRASCO journal, Vincent Flihol and Juliette Mourques analyse the findings of the recent Court...
Press review
19 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 19 June 2026
This week’s review looks at the indictment of former Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Zapatero on charges of influence peddling...
Event
19 June 2026
«Private Equity, Hedge Funds, Crypto and the Shadow Banking Challenge»
The 22nd Annual Anti‑Corruption Conference of the International Bar Association brought together a panel of legal practitioners, compliance experts and...
Press review
12 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 12 June 2026
This week’s press review looks at the announcement by the French Financial Markets Authority (AMF) that its 2026 report will...
Publication
8 June 2026
Competition law enforcement in labor markets : a new trend
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 12th edition, focusing on the French Competition Authority’s decision sanctioning the SNMSF for...
Press review
5 June 2026
Press Review – Week of 5 June 2026
This week’s press review covers the concerns raised by Transparency International France following the publication of the French Agence française...
Press review
29 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 29 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction of Patrick Balkany in two separate cases involving the misappropriation of public funds;...
Press review
22 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 22 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the appellate conviction of Airbus and Air France for involuntary manslaughter in connection with the...
Press review
15 May 2026
Press Review – Week of 15 May 2026
This week’s press review covers the Public Prosecutor’s submissions against Nicolas Sarkozy in the Libyan financing case; a decision of...
Event
13 May 2026
Still alive and kicking : mutations of global anti-corruption enforcement
A roundtable discussion on the management of cross-border investigations and audits related to compliance and cooperation with authorities, as part...