Analysis
14 July 2017

Transposition of the EU’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The European Union’s Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (the Directive) came into force on 26th June 2015. Its aim was to prevent the use of the Union’s financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing. It required European member states to update their respective money laundering laws and “transpose” the new requirements into local law by 26th June 2017.

A key role was given to the principle of risk analysis and adequate safeguards. Among its main elements, the Directive required Member states to carry out a national risk assessment of their exposure to money laundering and terrorist financing and to maintain central registers on the beneficial ownership of corporations, reinforce the rules on Customer Due Diligence, widen the definition of Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) and include tax crimes as a predicate offence for money laundering.

The ordinance n°2016-1635 (the Ordinance) reinforcing the French anti-money laundering and terrorist financing dispositive was passed on December 1st, 2016 to transpose the Directive.

The prerogatives of the French Financial Intelligence Unit (Tracfin) have been widened. Tracfin’s right of communication with other obliged entities has been extended to entities which are not subject to anti-money laundering regulations. As an example, the right of communication now applies to the institution in charge of managing attorneys’ pecuniary settlements (CARPA). The Ordinance also allows Tracfin to transmit collected information to several administrative authorities and to foreign Financial Intelligence Units and reinforces Tracfin’s right to oppose any suspicious transaction not yet executed.

The Ordinance also imposes the obligation on companies and other legal entities to record their ultimate beneficial owners with the Companies Register. This register is notably accessible to Tracfin, customers, tax administration and professionals.

The scope of the anti-money laundering legislation has been widened by the inclusion of payment or virtual money institutions conducting business in France, authorized banking intermediaries, virtual money converting platforms, providers of gambling services (for transactions above €2000), traders of precious commodities accepting large cash payments and crowdfunding intermediaries.

Finally, the ordinance reinforces supervision schemes by imposing new obligations upon companies in terms of internal procedures and by implementing due diligence requirements. The ordinance also reinforces the range of sanctions which can be taken. The ACPR is now allowed to exercise control and take police measures. It may impose pecuniary sanctions (up to €100mn or 10% of the annual turnover). Sanctions may also be taken against individual directors or employees in charge of the anti-money laundering structure.

Related content

Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
20 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 16 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) praising Monaco’s progress in combating money laundering, the dismissal...
Publication
19 February 2026
Assessing the fight against corruption: modalities and effectiveness of international peer review mechanisms
Revue internationale de la compliance et de l’éthique des affaires recently published an article co-authored by Vincent Filhol and Caroline...
Press review
13 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 9 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the requirement to provide grounds when extending pre-trial detention; the opening by the French National...
News
10 February 2026
Key Findings from the 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index
Transparency International has released the CPI for 2025, which highlights limited progress and persistent setbacks in the fight against corruption,...
EventNews
9 February 2026
The evolution of the FCPA and changes in anti-corruption enforcement in a changing geopolitical landscape
The IBA Anti-Corruption Asia Conference in Tokyo provided a rich forum for discussion on the evolution of the FCPA and...
Press review
6 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 2 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the prosecution’s submissions in the appeal trial of Marine Le Pen, a Cour de cassation...
Event
5 February 2026
Focus on French Compliance regulators
A conference for ESMD on French Compliance regulators' roles and tools, as well as interactions with judicial authorities and a...
2 min
Press review
30 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 26 January 2026
This week’s press review covers the opening of the appeal trial of four individuals convicted for their involvement in the...
Press review
23 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 19 January 2026
This week’s press review covers Free’s conviction by the CNIL for serious breaches of the GDPR’s security requirements; the French...
Press review
16 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 12 January 2026
This week’s press review covers the judicial public interest agreement entered into by HSBC in connection with dividend-related tax fraud...
Analysis
12 January 2026
Clarifications on attorney-client privilege and the prerogatives of the judicial judge in tax matters
In a ruling dated 8 October 2025, the French Court of Cassation clarified the scope of attorney-client privilege, the judge’s...