Analysis
14 July 2021

The PNF looks back on a very unusual 2020 year

Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates

 

The French Financial Prosecutor Office (“PNF”) was created in 2013 in the aftermath of a scandal where a former Budget Minister was accused of holding unreported bank accounts in offshore jurisdictions[i]. Operational since February 1st, 2014, the PNF has national jurisdiction to prosecute and investigate on infringements to probity, tax, and the proper functioning of financial markets such as corruption, money laundering, tax fraud or market manipulation[ii]. The PNF was recently granted concurrent jurisdiction on anti-competition offences[iii].

In a criminal procedure circular of June 2020, the French Ministry of Justice consolidated the role of the PNF in the fight against corruption[iv]. The PNF is invited to consider any alert from authorities, whistleblowers, regulated professions, authorized NGOs or media investigations[v]. The circular also encourages the PNF to prosecute acts of corruption committed by companies carrying out part of their activity in France, even if they do not have their head office there[vi].

With 601 pending proceedings, 123 new investigations, respectively 27 and 64 requests for mutual assistance issued and received in 2020, the PNF had a busy year[vii]. 38 % of its cases originated from information transmitted by public authorities and 24% from complaints filed directly with the PNF. 53 % of cases are related to probity breach, 40 % to tax offenses and 7% to financial markets rules violation. The total of the fines imposed by the PNF amounted to €2.1 billion and the total amount of confiscations reached €121.9 million[viii].

2020 was also marked by significant cases including the Airbus CJIP led by the PNF in collaboration with the UK Serious Fraud Office and the US Department of Justice[ix]. Another important case was that of Rifaat Al-Assad, the uncle of the current Syrian head of state, who was convicted and had his assets in France confiscated[x]. Some cases brought strong media coverage such as the conviction of former French Prime Minister François Fillon and his wife for misappropriation of public funds[xi], and the conviction of Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s for corruption and influence peddling[xii].

Statements by the former PNF Head Eliane Houlette has revived the debate on the independence of the French Prosecutor vis-à-visthe executive power. She declared that the independence of French prosecutors, in particular of the PNF, is hampered by a number of obstacles[xiii]. Moreover, in the case of Nicolas Sarkozy, the PNF carried out investigations on several lawyers’ telephone records, known as fadettes. Eric Dupont-Moretti, a former defense attorney whose fadettes were investigated by the PNF in the context of this case and who has since become Minister of Justice, filed a complaint for breach of professional secrecy which he has later retracted[xiv].

The fadettes scandal led to an investigation into the functioning of the PNF by the General Inspection of Justice and the report of such investigation was published in September 2020[xv]. It noted that the access by investigators to a lawyer’s phone records during a preliminary investigation does not, per se, violate his or her professional secrecy[xvi]. This analysis is in line with prevailing case law which had, in the last few years, jeopardized the absolute nature of the Attorney’s professional secrecy[xvii]. Indeed, it is possible for a client’s conversation with his Attorney to be taped, reviewed and transcribed during a criminal investigation, if it appears during such conversation that the attorney may have participated in the offence[xviii].

Yet, the Report pinpoints ‘a lack of rigour’ in the handling of the PNF’s work and underlines the fact that the preliminary investigation, in the Nicolas Sarkozy case, had lasted for more than five years[xix], which must be put into perspective with the fact that during that time, the defense had virtually no access to the case file[xx]. Indeed, during a preliminary investigation, the suspect may only request access to the case file after a year from the beginning of such investigation, and the request is subject to the discretionary decision of the prosecutor.[xxi] The Report also underlines that during the preliminary investigation, the parties cannot challenge the investigative acts decided by the prosecutor[xxii].

In response to these remarks, the PNF has decided to systemically grant access to the case file to persons under investigation when the prosecutor is considering referring them to criminal court[xxiii].

Besides these few observations on the preliminary investigation procedure, the report made 19 recommendations to improve the functioning and organization of the PNF[xxiv].

Between the Covid 19 pandemic, the high-profile cases and the controversies on defense rights, 2020 was definitely a busy year for the PNF.

Related content

Press review
11 July 2025
Press review – Week of 7 July 2025
This week's press review covers the ongoing trial of a fictitious employment case at Le Canard enchaîné, the sanctioning of...
Publication
8 July 2025
Observatory of Judicial Agreements of Public Interest
Over the past 12 months, 16 CJIPs have been concluded, reflecting a rise in fines, particularly in environmental and tax-related...
Publication
8 July 2025
Evolution of white collar crime: Between regulatory strengthening and judicial trend-setting
The fight for integrity is intensifying in France, with more high-profile trials, strengthened anti-money laundering regulations, and evolving case law,...
Publication
8 July 2025
A year of criminal justice: focus on 6 major criminal trials
A look at six criminal trials that have shaped the French judicial landscape over the past twelve months, due to...
Press review
4 July 2025
Press review – Week of 30 June 2025
This week's press review covers the dismissal of the public prosecutor's case in the scandal involving distressed companies, the referral...
Press review
4 July 2025
Press review – Week of 30 June 2025
This week's press review covers the dismissal of the public prosecutor's case in the scandal involving distressed companies, the referral...
Press review
27 June 2025
Press review – Week of 23 June 2025
This week's press review covers the dismissal of the public prosecutor's case in the scandal involving distressed companies, the referral...
Event
24 June 2025
Moving from a compliance program to a true culture and ethics of anti-corruption in decision-making
On 25 and 26 June 2025, the International Bar Association's annual anti-corruption conference will be held in Paris, providing an...
Press review
20 June 2025
Press review – Week of 16 June 2025
This week's press review covers the recommendations of the Cercle des Juristes, which has put forward seven proposals aimed at...
Analysis
15 June 2025
The DOJ releases its new guidelines for investigations and enforcement of the FCPA
On 9 June 2025, the U.S. Deputy Attorney General issued a memorandum establishing new guidelines for investigations and enforcement of...
Press review
13 June 2025
Press review – Week of 9 June 2025
This week's press review covers the indictment of Pascaline Bongo in a corruption and money laundering case, the designation of...
Analysis
11 June 2025
The evolution of US law enforcement policy regarding corruption and organized crime
By executive order dated 10 February 2025, the Trump administration temporarily suspended FCPA enforcement actions as part of a strategic...