Analysis
16 September 2021

The French DPA (“Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public”) on the way to simplification

On 4 August 2021, a new Decree was promulgated aiming to simplify formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between Public Prosecutors Office and the legal person concerned.

 

Since the Sapin II law on transparency, fighting corruption and modernisation of the economy published on 10 December 2016, the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (hereinafter CJIP) is an alternative to prosecution offered by a French Public Prosecutor to a legal entity targeted by criminal inquiries or investigations regarding a limited type of offenses which allows the latter to enter into an agreement and avoid criminal charges in exchange of a fine and the implementation of a compliance program[1].

Initially, it was intended to apply to a certain number of offenses such as corruption and influence peddling. However, since 2016, two additional laws[2] and a decree[3] had extended the scope of application of the CJIP to a certain number of tax and environmental offenses.

Yet, on 4 August 2021 and after some years of practice, a new Decree[4] was promulgated aiming to simplify the formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the legal person concerned.

The previous procedural framework made it mandatory for the French Public Prosecutor to address the offer of a CJIP via a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt[5] and to grant the legal entity with a time frame for its consideration. The legal representatives of the legal entity then had to inform the Public Prosecutor of the acceptance or refusal of the CJIP by letter or through a statement made by the latter to the Public Prosecutor, who would draw up a formal report [6].

The 2021 Decree repeals all of the above and instead provides that “the offer for a CJIP is signed by the public prosecutor and, if accepted, by the representatives or lawyers of the legal entity”[7]. In that sense, the Decree implements the rights for the legal entity to be assisted by a counsel[8].

In the same vein, the obligation to pay the fine provided for in the CJIP with a certified cheque no longer applies [9].

Related content

Press review
7 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 3 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s examination of the legality of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump,...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Press review
31 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 27 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the decision to release former banker Wahib Nacer, who was convicted in the Libyan case...
Press review
24 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 20 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the formal notice issued to Airbus Atlantic by the French Human Rights League (LDH) for...
Publication
23 October 2025
CumCum: CACIB to settle with the French Financial Prosecutor over tax fraud case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 10th edition, focusing on the agreement settled by CACIB with the French Financial...
Press review
17 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 13 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the decision by the Swiss Public Prosecutor’s Office to close a case involving the FIFA...
Press review
10 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 6 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the allegations of diversion of €9 million in development aid to Somalia from the Swedish...
Press review
3 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 29 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the guilty plea entered by a businesswoman before the Southwark Crown Court in London for...
Event
26 September 2025
Ethical dilemmas for lawyers in compliance and financial crime matters
A round-table discussion held at the Concilium Network Global Summit in Warsaw on 26 September 2025, co-organised by Navacelle.
Press review
26 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 22 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the settlement reached by UBS ending a long-standing tax dispute in France, the filing of...
Analysis
22 September 2025
CJIP Surys: a fine, a compliance penalty and compensation for the victim
On 8 July 2025, SAS SURYS entered into a Judicial Public Interest Agreement (CJIP) in respect of acts of bribery...
Press review
19 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 15 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the dismantling of the darknet platform “DFAS” which led to the arrest of two suspects...