Analysis
16 September 2021

The French DPA (“Convention judiciaire d’intérêt public”) on the way to simplification

On 4 August 2021, a new Decree was promulgated aiming to simplify formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between Public Prosecutors Office and the legal person concerned.

 

Since the Sapin II law on transparency, fighting corruption and modernisation of the economy published on 10 December 2016, the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (hereinafter CJIP) is an alternative to prosecution offered by a French Public Prosecutor to a legal entity targeted by criminal inquiries or investigations regarding a limited type of offenses which allows the latter to enter into an agreement and avoid criminal charges in exchange of a fine and the implementation of a compliance program[1].

Initially, it was intended to apply to a certain number of offenses such as corruption and influence peddling. However, since 2016, two additional laws[2] and a decree[3] had extended the scope of application of the CJIP to a certain number of tax and environmental offenses.

Yet, on 4 August 2021 and after some years of practice, a new Decree[4] was promulgated aiming to simplify the formalities required for the conclusion of the CJIP between the Public Prosecutor’s Office and the legal person concerned.

The previous procedural framework made it mandatory for the French Public Prosecutor to address the offer of a CJIP via a registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt[5] and to grant the legal entity with a time frame for its consideration. The legal representatives of the legal entity then had to inform the Public Prosecutor of the acceptance or refusal of the CJIP by letter or through a statement made by the latter to the Public Prosecutor, who would draw up a formal report [6].

The 2021 Decree repeals all of the above and instead provides that “the offer for a CJIP is signed by the public prosecutor and, if accepted, by the representatives or lawyers of the legal entity”[7]. In that sense, the Decree implements the rights for the legal entity to be assisted by a counsel[8].

In the same vein, the obligation to pay the fine provided for in the CJIP with a certified cheque no longer applies [9].

Related content

Press review
3 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 3 April 2026
This week’s press review covers the adoption by the European Parliament of the European Union’s first anti-corruption directive; the expansion...
Event
3 April 2026
Money Laundering in the age of cryptocurrency
Conference on anti-money laundering, presented to students in the Master 2 program in Economic Criminal Law and Compliance at Paris...
2 min
Press review
27 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 27 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the publication by the Direction Générale de la Sécurité Intérieure (DGSI) of a report warning...
Press review
20 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 16 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the ruling of the French Cour de cassation on the so-called “fake bank advisor” fraud;...
Analysis
19 March 2026
Review of the CJIP agreement between HSBC and the PNF for aggravated tax fraud
In the context of the CumCum case, the French National Financial Prosecutor’s Office (PNF) and HSBC Bank plc concluded a...
Press review
13 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 9 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction of the Rocher Group for failure to comply with its duty of vigilance,...
Press review
6 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 2 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the conclusion of a Judicial Public Interest Agreement (CJIP) between the French National Financial Prosecutor’s...
Press review
27 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 23 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the arbitration proceedings initiated between Togo and Ghana concerning the delimitation of their maritime boundary...
Press review
20 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 16 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) praising Monaco’s progress in combating money laundering, the dismissal...
Press review
13 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 9 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the requirement to provide grounds when extending pre-trial detention; the opening by the French National...
Press review
6 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 2 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the prosecution’s submissions in the appeal trial of Marine Le Pen, a Cour de cassation...
Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...