Analysis
14 July 2020

The challenges brought to the independence of the French Public Prosecutor’s Office

Bastille Day Newsletter 2020 - 3-lines outline of some noteworthy events

 

Recent statements by the former French Financial Prosecutor, Eliane Houlette, before the Parliamentary Board of Inquiry [1], has revived the debate on the independence of the French Prosecutor vis-à-vis the executive power.

Indeed, she stated that the independence of French prosecutors, in particular of the French Financial Prosecutor Office (“PNF”), is hampered by a number of obstacles [2]. Among these, the power of the General Prosecutor’s Office, directly linked to the Minister for Justice, to provide general instructions and to request reports on pending cases from the PNF:

“So, in practical and concrete terms, the feeling of dependency [from the executive power] is something I have experienced within the performance of my duties. […] the problem is that through general instructions and special reports, the General Prosecutor’s Office grants himself a right of oversight over the conduct and policy choices of public prosecutors. […] And this right to oversee is omnipresent. […] The question that we can actually ask ourselves is why does the General Prosecutor’s Office have this right to oversee the public prosecution, through specific cases? How should we understand it? Is he acting for himself or for someone else? ” [3].

These statements caused quite a stir, namely considering that Eliane Houlette conducted the investigation of the former French prime Minister François Fillon and his wife, who were accused of misappropriation of public assets and that she reported pressure from the General Prosecutor’s Office to provide and communicate information pertaining to this case.

Another former investigative magistrate, Renaud Van Ruymbeke, condemned the lack of independence of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, stating that politicians have never lobbied for it [4].

In addition, a few days before his appointment as French Minister of Justice, Eric Dupond Moretti, a French criminal lawyer, filed a complaint against X before the Paris Prosecutor office after having been secretly wiretapped by the PNF during an investigation held in 2014 regarding corruption facts involving the former French President Nicolas Sarkozy [5]. He finally withdrew his complaint after his appointment and stated that he will campaign for the reform regarding the independence of the justice:

I want to progress on a subject that is close to my heart: the independence of the justice system. I wish to be the Minister of Justice who will finally bring the long-awaited reform of the Public Prosecutor’s Office to a congress” [6].

Related content

News
7 July 2026
Bastille Day Newsletter 2026
As they do every year for 14 July, Navacelle's lawyers offer you a selection of noticeable events which occurred in...
Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Press review
24 July 2026
Press Review – Week of 24 July 2026
This week, the press review highlights the Paris administrative court’s decision concerning whistleblower status in the case involving Édouard Philippe,...
Analysis
23 July 2026
The AFA’s Sanctions Committee imposes its first financial penalties
The Sanctions Committee of the French Anti-Corruption Agency (AFA) made use of its enforcement powers for the first time in...
Press review
17 July 2026
Press Review – Week of 17 July 2026
This week, the press review looks at the first decision by the French Anti-Corruption Agency’s Sanctions Commission imposing a financial...
Event
13 July 2026
2026 Global White Collar Crime Institute-Singapore Plenary Session II: Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on...
Stéphane de Navacelle spoke at the 2026 Global White Collar Crime Institute in Singapore, alongside Zvi Gabbay, Fabio Cagnola, Bintang...
Press review
10 July 2026
Press Review – Week of 10 July 2026
This week, the press review looks at the publication of the French Antibribery Agency (AFA)’s 2025 activity report, Marine Le...
Publication
9 July 2026
Observatory of Judicial Agreements of Public Interest
Over the past 12 months, 21 CJIPs have been concluded, with increasing convergence toward the DPAs used in Anglo-Saxon legal systems.
Publication
7 July 2026
The French Prudential Supervision and Resolution Authority activity
The year 2025 was marked by sustained activity by ACPR and a record fine of €20 million imposed on Société...
Publication
7 July 2026
The new 2026 International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration rules
The new ICC Arbitration rules are intended to enhance efficiency, clarity and case management in international arbitration, while preserving the...
Publication
7 July 2026
The French Competition Authority activity
The French Competition Authority maintained sustained enforcement activity in 2025, with 9 enforcement decisions issued totaling €379 million in sanctions.
Publication
7 July 2026
The French Financial Markets Authority activity
The year 2025 confirms the strong momentum of the AMF’s enforcement action, with intensified detection of professional misconduct and market...
Publication
7 July 2026
The French Data Protection Authority activity
The year 2025 was marked by a significant increase in the CNIL’s activity, with a rise in complaints, data breach...
Publication
7 July 2026
A year of criminal justice: focus on major criminal trials
A look at criminal trials that have shaped the French judicial landscape over the past twelve months, due to their...