Analysis
14 July 2019

Société Générale DPA for violations of Cuban embargo – manipulation of the law in global economic warfare

Bastille Day Newsletter 2019 - Enforcement / Court Decisions

 

Three months after agreeing to settle for 1.3 billion dollars in the Libyan and LIBOR case 1, Société Générale signed another Deferred Prosecution Agreement (“DPA”) on November 18, 2018, with the US Attorney’s Office of the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”) for Cuba’s embargo violation 2.

Extraterritorial application of U.S. laws on embargo

As a matter of international law, an embargo should apply only to nationals of the concerned State or the nationals of the States imposing the measure, who must refrain from any commercial exchange with the State or entities subject to the measure says the leading French legal publication 3. The general sentiment in France is that in the case concerning Société Générale, the US have gone beyond that principle.

Sanction of the French bank justified by the use of the U.S. trade system

Put in place in 1962, the embargo on Cuba prohibits in particular most imports and exports between the U.S. and Cuba and has been strengthened several times 4. As a unilateral decision, it is supposed to be applicable only to US nationals.

By stating however that Société Générale “engaged in a deliberate practice of concealing the Cuban nexus of U.S. dollar payments that were made in connection with those facilities5 the agreement enshrines the US dollar as the tool of one of the US’s exports.

In the Société Générale case, the French bank has been accused of having, from 2004 to 2010, granted payment facilities to Cuban entities and hidden transactions, that should they have been revealed, would have been prohibited by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”).

Nearly 2,500 transactions occurred and are presumed to have used the U.S. trade system, amounting to a total of 13 billion dollars. Most of these transactions financed oil purchases or sales between a Dutch trading company and the Cuban state-owned company with a monopoly on crude oil production and refining.

The investigations revealed that a majority of the transactions were put an end to in 2007 in fear of the US authorities, which were at that time investigating violations of the Iranian embargo in various companies.

European companies and French banks in particular, have already faced investigations by US authorities and this is not the first time that such a fine is imposed. On June 30, 2014, BNP Paribas accepted to pay a 8.9 billion fine for violation of the U.S. embargoes on Cuba, Sudan and Iran 6 and in October 2015, Crédit Agricole, faced with similar charges, negotiated a 787 million dollar deal 7.

Economic and legal battle

More recently, on May 2, 2019, the US government reactivated Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, passed in 1996 but never implemented 8, paving the way for claims to be brought before US courts by US nationals against foreign persons and entities that have made profits by trading with nationalized Cuban companies.

This law enables proceedings to be brought against any foreign company (including European and Canadian) that manage business in Cuba – from hotel and tourist venues to rum distilleries and cigar factories 9.

At the announcement of this DPA and considering the application of unilateral measures against Cuba running contrary to international law, the EU has decided to react and threatens to bring the case before the World Trade Organization – marking a short-lived attempt at a recast of the global economic and legal landscape 10.

Related content

Publication
14 July 2021
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021
Happy 2021 Bastille Day! Lawyers at Navacelle thought you might be interested in reviewing a selection we made of noticeable events which occurred in France i...
Stéphane de Navacelle
Managing partner Navacelle
Clémentine Duverne
Partner Navacelle
Julie Zorrilla
Partner Navacelle
Analysis
The in-house attorney status in France: a bygone idea or an emerging one?
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
The evaluation mission of the Sapin II law calls for a boost in France’s anti-corruption policy
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
Criminal liability’s transfer to the acquiring company in the event of a merger by acquisition and consecutive due dil...
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Enforcement & Court Decisions
Analysis
The PNF looks back on a very unusual 2020 year
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
Compliance in the public sector: The Ministry of the Armed Forces issued its Code of prevention of breaches of probity
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
What will be the impact of the transposition of the EU Directive on the protection of whistleblowers into French law?
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy updates
Analysis
The professional secrecy threatened by recent case law on seizure
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Enforcement & Court Decisions
Analysis
Short overview of the French legal requirement for internal controls relating to the AML-CFT
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
Analysis
Preserving the primacy of due process and fair trial rights in the special context of the Coronavirus pandemic
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Enforcement & Court Decisions