Short overview of the French legal requirement for internal controls relating to the AML-CFT
Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates
On 16 January 2021, a new Order clarifying the requirements for internal controls relating to anti-money laundering and combating terrorist financing and assets freezing was published in the French Official Journal[i]. It came into force on 1 March 2021[ii] and describes the content of the AML-CFT system that entities subjected to AML-CFT obligations[iii] must put in place.
This text completes the Ordinance no.2020-115 of 12 February 2020[iv] transposing the fifth directive of the European Union on AML-CFT[v] and ensures France’s compliance with the last recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”, the intergovernmental AML-CFT body)[vi].
The entities subjected to AML-CFT obligations must identify, assess, and classify money laundering and terrorist financing risks, for existing products as well as when launching a new product, service or business practice[vii]. The level of risk must be assessed and updated according to the FATF, the European Commission and the OECD risk country lists[viii].
The internal control system must be formalized in writing with the necessary precision and has to be updated regularly to allow its implementation[ix].
Parent companies must establish and update a classification of risks identified and assessed at group level[x]. Procedures should be put in place to ensure the effectiveness of AML-CFT systems to reduce these risks[xi] and a group compliance officer must be appointed to this end[xii].
The Order also elaborates on the role of the AML-CFT Compliance Officer who is in charge of defining and monitoring the implementation of the AML-CFT system. In this capacity, that person must validate the risk classification, validate the AML-CFT internal procedures ensuring that information exchange and escalation procedures enable the effective and rapid transmission of the information required for the performance of their duties to the persons involved in the implementation of AML-CFT obligations. The Compliance Officer must also ensure that the subsidiaries and branches established abroad have mechanisms in place to monitor the compliance of their operations with local rules on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing and the freezing of assets[xiii].
After informing the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Resolution (“ACPR”)[xiv], the reporting entity may choose to entrust AML-CFT prevention to an external service provider[xv]. The Order describes the compulsory terms and conditions of outsourcing contracts, such as the description of the service provider’s tasks or its obligation to inform the reporting entity of any event affecting its mission[xvi]. Entities subjected to the Order must ensure that outsourcing contracts signed before March 2021 comply with the Order before 16 January 2022[xvii].
The Order reiterates the obligation to detect any transaction carried out for the benefit of persons subject to a freezing order, or any use of funds or resources held by persons subject to such an order[xviii]. Internal procedures must be put in place, particularly for the analysis of alerts relating to freezing orders and for the implementation of freezing measures and their lifting[xix].
Furthermore, the Order reaffirms the requirement to implement an internal control system for operations. The reporting entity must designate persons responsible for a specific permanent[xx] and periodic [xxi] Such persons must be independent from operational staff [xxii] and their identity must be communicated to the ACPR[xxiii].
Finally, the Order insists on the responsibility of the top management in the implementation of AML-CFT measures. To do so, they must have the necessary information[xxiv] to periodically monitor their effectiveness and take the necessary measures to remedy their inadequacy[xxv]. An annual report on the organisation of the internal control mechanisms must be drafted by the board or any other managing or governing body of the entity[xxvi].
Through the Order, the French legislator clearly intends to intensify its fight against threats related to money laundering, terrorist financing and the freezing of assets.
Related content
Press review
1 November 2024
Press review – Week of 28 October 2024
This week’s press review covers on BNP Paribas’ conviction to compensate a fake bank advisor fraud victim, ESMA’s report positioning...
Press review
25 October 2024
Press review – Week of 21 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the dismissal of the investigation into laundering of tax fraud money the Mulliez Group, the...
Press review
18 October 2024
Press review – Week of 14 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the failure of around a quarter of France’s major companies to comply with their obligation...
Press review
11 October 2024
Press review – Week of 7 October 2024
This week’s press review covers the corruption indictment of the mayor of New York, the investigation into the embezzlement of...
Press review
4 October 2024
Press review – Week of 30 September 2024
This week’s press review covers the financial fraud perpetrated against the Kiabi brand, the opening of the RN’s European parliamentary...
Publication
1 October 2024
Novelty in the transfer of criminal liability from the absorbed company to the absorbing company
Following a merger, the criminal liability of the company being absorbed is transferred to the acquiring company, now regardless of...
Press review
27 September 2024
Press review – Week of 23 September 2024
This week’s press review covers the follow-up to the Judicial Public Interest Agreement (“CJIP”) with Nestlé, and notably the two...
Analysis
20 September 2024
Look back at the CJIP concluded between Danske Bank and the French National financial prosecutor’s...
Danske Bank was charged with tax fraud laundering which occurred between 2007 and 2014 due to the lack of effectiveness...
Press review
20 September 2024
Press review – Week of 16 September 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the new obligation to relinquish seized assets in CJIP introduced by Law 2024-582, the...
Press review
13 September 2024
Press review – Week of 9 September 2024
This week’s press review focuses on the trial of eight members of the military for corruption and favoritism before the...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
6 September 2024
Press review – Week of 2 September 2024
This week’s press review focuses on Nicolas Sarkozy’s request for additional information in the Libyan financing affair, on the searches...
We use cookies to optimize our website and our services.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Préférences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.