Analysis
14 July 2021

Short overview of the French legal requirement for internal controls relating to the AML-CFT

Bastille Day Newsletter 2021 - Legislative, Regulatory & Policy Updates

 

On 16 January 2021, a new Order clarifying the requirements for internal controls relating to anti-money laundering and combating terrorist financing and assets freezing was published in the French Official Journal[i]. It came into force on 1 March 2021[ii] and describes the content of the AML-CFT system that entities subjected to AML-CFT obligations[iii] must put in place.

This text completes the Ordinance no.2020-115 of 12 February 2020[iv] transposing the fifth directive of the European Union on AML-CFT[v] and ensures France’s compliance with the last recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”, the intergovernmental AML-CFT body)[vi].

The entities subjected to AML-CFT obligations must identify, assess, and classify money laundering and terrorist financing risks, for existing products as well as when launching a new product, service or business practice[vii]. The level of risk must be assessed and updated according to the FATF, the European Commission and the OECD risk country lists[viii].

The internal control system must be formalized in writing with the necessary precision and has to be updated regularly to allow its implementation[ix].

Parent companies must establish and update a classification of risks identified and assessed at group level[x]. Procedures should be put in place to ensure the effectiveness of AML-CFT systems to reduce these risks[xi] and a group compliance officer must be appointed to this end[xii].

The Order also elaborates on the role of the AML-CFT Compliance Officer who is in charge of defining and monitoring the implementation of the AML-CFT system. In this capacity, that person must validate the risk classification, validate the AML-CFT internal procedures ensuring that information exchange and escalation procedures enable the effective and rapid transmission of the information required for the performance of their duties to the persons involved in the implementation of AML-CFT obligations. The Compliance Officer must also ensure that the subsidiaries and branches established abroad have mechanisms in place to monitor the compliance of their operations with local rules on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing and the freezing of assets[xiii].

After informing the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Resolution (“ACPR”)[xiv], the reporting entity may choose to entrust AML-CFT prevention to an external service provider[xv]. The Order describes the compulsory terms and conditions of outsourcing contracts, such as the description of the service provider’s tasks or its obligation to inform the reporting entity of any event affecting its mission[xvi]. Entities subjected to the Order must ensure that outsourcing contracts signed before March 2021 comply with the Order before 16 January 2022[xvii].

The Order reiterates the obligation to detect any transaction carried out for the benefit of persons subject to a freezing order, or any use of funds or resources held by persons subject to such an order[xviii]. Internal procedures must be put in place, particularly for the analysis of alerts relating to freezing orders and for the implementation of freezing measures and their lifting[xix].

Furthermore, the Order reaffirms the requirement to implement an internal control system for operations. The reporting entity must designate persons responsible for a specific permanent[xx] and periodic [xxi] Such persons must be independent from operational staff [xxii] and their identity must be communicated to the ACPR[xxiii].

Finally, the Order insists on the responsibility of the top management in the implementation of AML-CFT measures. To do so, they must have the necessary information[xxiv] to periodically monitor their effectiveness and take the necessary measures to remedy their inadequacy[xxv]. An annual report on the organisation of the internal control mechanisms must be drafted by the board or any other managing or governing body of the entity[xxvi].

Through the Order, the French legislator clearly intends to intensify its fight against threats related to money laundering, terrorist financing and the freezing of assets.

Related content

Press review
Press review - Week of 26 September 2022
30 September 2022
Press review – Week of 26 September 2022
In this press review, you will find an analysis of a recent decision of the French Cour de cassation which reiterates the legal obligations of financial institutions rega...
Press review
Press review - Week of 19 September 2022
23 September 2022
Press review – Week of 19 September 2022
In this week's press review, you will discover the criminal initiatives at the European Union level announced by the President of the European Commission, and the new Fre...
Press review
Press review - Week of 12 September 2022
16 September 2022
Press review – Week of 12 September 2022
In this week's press review, you will find three articles on white collar crime. Firstly, clarifications related to the cumulation of qualification for tax fraud and omis...
Press review
Press review - Week of 29 August 2022
2 September 2022
Press review – Week of 29 August 2022
In this press review you will find the implications for France following the delay of transposition of the European directive on whistleblowers. The French Conseil d'Etat...
Press review
Press review - Week of 25 july 2022
29 July 2022
Press review – Week of 25 July 2022
In this review, you will discover two CNIL’s recent decisions, the first one aiming at protecting data rental cars’ users and the second one aiming at regulating the ...
Press review
Press review - Week of 11 july 2022
15 July 2022
Press review – Week of 11 July 2022
In this press review you will find a decision of the French Cour de cassation which clarifies the interpretation of the principle of speciality in extradition matters. Mo...
Analysis
Transposition of the European Whistleblowers Directive: Towards a reinforcement of the French protection system
14 July 2022
Transposition of the European Whistleblowers Directive: Towards a reinforcement of the French protection system
The text of the law aimed at improving the protection of whistleblowers, drafted by the Joint Committee, was approved by the National Assembly on 8 February and by the Se...
Analysis
The challenges of environmental criminal law in the light of the deferred prosecution agreement in environmental matters
14 July 2022
The challenges of environmental criminal law in the light of the deferred prosecution agreement in environmental matters
A new deferred prosecution agreement in environmental matters is an opportunity to review the creation of this new mechanism serving French environmental criminal law, bu...
Publication
BDN 2022
14 July 2022
Bastille Day Newsletter 2022
On this 14th of July, lawyers at Navacelle offer you, as it does every year, a selection of noticeable events which occurred in France during the last 12 months in the fi...
Analysis
transfer of criminal liability following a merger or acquisition
14 July 2022
Transfer of criminal liability following a merger or acquisition
In a ruling of April 13, 2022, the Court clarified the nature of the control that must be performed by judges on prosecutions against absorbing companies after its histor...
Analysis
The cumulation of criminal and administrative sanctions in tax fraud
14 July 2022
The cumulation of criminal and administrative sanctions in tax fraud
The judges of the Court of Cassation recently ruled on the cumulation of criminal and fiscal sanctions in tax fraud cases. This decision confirms the case law which permi...
Publication
The Guide to Sanctions -GIR (2022)
10 July 2022
The Guide to Sanctions (2022) – GIR
Navacelle co-author of the third edition of the Global Investigation Review's Guide to Sanctions.