Event
12 September 2024

Future prospects for International Anti-Corruption Court

Look back at the roundtable held on 13 June 2024 at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), in Paris, during the 20th annual anticorruption conference of the International Bar Association (IBA).

 

On 13 June 2024, the International Bar Association (IBA) Anti-corruption conference’s 10th panel was held in Paris. The discussion focused on the future International Anti-corruption Court (IACC).

 

Report:

The participants discussed the activity of the Integrity Initiatives International, an NGO dedicated to strengthening the enforcement of criminal law, and more specifically effort towards the establishment of the IACC.

Judge Mark Wolf indicated that more than 350 world leaders, such as former and current Presidents, Nobel laureates, have declared, publicly or privately, their support for the creation of the IACC. He stated that the IACC would strengthen the enforcement and uniformization of the laws required by the United Union Convention Against Corruption and allow the prosecution of high officials, those who conspire with them, and all facilitators such as lawyers, bankers, real estate’s agents.

Serena Ibrahim emphasized her willingness to leverage youth talents and social innovation to fight and develop more effective and creative anti-corruption solutions. She explained that to do so, the IACC had to be created and recognized by the international judicial system to enable it to hold kleptocrats accountable when national judicial systems cannot or refuse to act.

Charles Adeogun-Phillips addressed corruption in Africa, how corrupt leaders would react to the creation of the IACC, as well as the court’s challenges, particularly the repatriation of misappropriated funds. He highlighted that a court would have to include two chambers, one criminal and one dedicated to assets with the use of non-conviction-based asset forfeiture programs. He also highlighted the fact that the IACC should not be modeled on the International Criminal Court (ICC) and should be funded by stolen funds.

Susan Lamb explained that the IACC, as the ICC, will be a safety net when the anticorruption mechanisms of accountability at national and regional levels fail. To this end, several committees have been created with 70 experts from a wide geographic area and a mix of specializations, including legal tradition, to have a 360-degree view of the corruption issue. She mentioned the (i) core crimes committee dedicated to identifying the crime to be prosecuted by the court, (ii) the court management committee, (iii) a third committee focused on victims, witnesses and whistleblowers, (iv) a committee dedicated to asset freezing and recovery, (v) and a procedural committee. Susan Lamb indicated that the following step will be to condense the work of the five committee to draft the statute of the IACC.

Finally, Judge Mark Wolf explained that the IACC will represent a preventive measure to diminish the sense of impunity of kleptocrats and will enable immunity to be waived at an international level. He pointed out that if countries ruled by kleptocrats do not join the IACC, it will still be able to act because of misappropriated funds placed in member countries. Judge Mark Wolf also raised the enforcement issue and relied on the Al-Bashir case (South-Africa) as an example to explain that the obligation to surrender a convicted person to the ICC is superior to national immunity. He added that kleptocrats do not invest their money abroad to stay in their own country.

 

Speakers:

The panel included:

  • Serena Ibrahim, board member of Integrity Initiatives International and founder and executive Director of Youth Against Corruption, from Beirut, Lebanon;
  • Charles Adeogun-Phillips, vice-chair of Integrity Initiatives International, former head of special investigations at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and Partner at Charles Anthony (lawyers) LPP, from Lagos, Nigeria;
  • Justice Susan Lamb, IACC treaty advisor committee and former Justice of the Supreme Court of Belize;
  • and Judge Mark Wolf, Chair of Integrity Initiatives International and Senior US District Judge from Boston, USA.

The panel was moderated by Stéphane de Navacelle, managing partner of Navacelle (Paris), IBA Anti-corruption committee regional representative for Western Europe.

Related content

Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
3 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 3 April 2026
This week’s press review covers the adoption by the European Parliament of the European Union’s first anti-corruption directive; the expansion...
Event
3 April 2026
Money Laundering in the age of cryptocurrency
Conference on anti-money laundering, presented to students in the Master 2 program in Economic Criminal Law and Compliance at Paris...
2 min
Analysis
31 March 2026
CACEIS Bank: Decision of the AMF Enforcement Committee of December 17, 2025
Following the H2O AM case, which resulted in a sanction against this management company in 2022, the AMF examined the...
Press review
27 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 27 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the publication by the Direction Générale de la Sécurité Intérieure (DGSI) of a report warning...
Press review
20 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 16 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the ruling of the French Cour de cassation on the so-called “fake bank advisor” fraud;...
Analysis
19 March 2026
Review of the CJIP agreement between HSBC and the PNF for aggravated tax fraud
In the context of the CumCum case, the French National Financial Prosecutor’s Office (PNF) and HSBC Bank plc concluded a...
Press review
13 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 9 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction of the Rocher Group for failure to comply with its duty of vigilance,...
Event
11 March 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026 – The fight against bias and noise, which unconsciously cloud the...
Navacelle is hosting a panel on 26 March 2026, as part of the Paris Arbitration Week (PAW).
Event
10 March 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026 – Fraus omnia corrumpit… Really? Paris courts and the enforcement of...
Navacelle is hosting a panel regarding Corruption and Arbitration on 24 March 2026, as part of the Paris Arbitration Week (PAW).
Press review
6 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 2 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the conclusion of a Judicial Public Interest Agreement (CJIP) between the French National Financial Prosecutor’s...
Analysis
3 March 2026
Analysis of President Maduro’s fall and its implications for Venezuela’s creditors
At the beginning of this year, the fall of the Venezuelan president suggests a likely intensification of initiatives by foreign...
Press review
27 February 2026
Press Review – Week of 23 February 2026
This week’s press review covers the arbitration proceedings initiated between Togo and Ghana concerning the delimitation of their maritime boundary...