Analysis
14 July 2017

Duty of care of parent and contracting companies law

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Related content

Publication
29 January 2026
Regulatory Implications of a Tainted Arbitration: Lessons from the TotalEnergies Case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 11th edition, focusing on a rare example of the diversion of international arbitration,...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
10 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 10 April 2026
This week’s press review focuses on the adoption at first reading of the bill to combat social security and tax...
Analysis
9 April 2026
Non-solicitation agreements and anti-competitive practices: A review of the June 11, 2025 decision issued by...
In the context of increased scrutiny by competition authorities of practices affecting labor markets, a webinar organised by the Antitrust...
Press review
3 April 2026
Press Review – Week of 3 April 2026
This week’s press review covers the adoption by the European Parliament of the European Union’s first anti-corruption directive; the expansion...
Event
3 April 2026
Money Laundering in the age of cryptocurrency
Conference on anti-money laundering, presented to students in the Master 2 program in Economic Criminal Law and Compliance at Paris...
2 min
Analysis
31 March 2026
CACEIS Bank: Decision of the AMF Enforcement Committee of December 17, 2025
Following the H2O AM case, which resulted in a sanction against this management company in 2022, the AMF examined the...
Event
30 March 2026
[PAW 2026] The New Geopolitics of Arbitration
Conference on the New Geopolitics of Arbitration, held at the Paris Court of Economic Affairs, as part of the Paris...
2 min
Press review
27 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 27 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the publication by the Direction Générale de la Sécurité Intérieure (DGSI) of a report warning...
Press review
20 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 16 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the ruling of the French Cour de cassation on the so-called “fake bank advisor” fraud;...
Analysis
19 March 2026
Review of the CJIP agreement between HSBC and the PNF for aggravated tax fraud
In the context of the CumCum case, the French National Financial Prosecutor’s Office (PNF) and HSBC Bank plc concluded a...
Press review
13 March 2026
Press Review – Week of 9 March 2026
This week’s press review covers the conviction of the Rocher Group for failure to comply with its duty of vigilance,...
Event
11 March 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026 – The fight against bias and noise, which unconsciously cloud the...
Navacelle is hosting a panel on 26 March 2026, as part of the Paris Arbitration Week (PAW).
Event
10 March 2026
Paris Arbitration Week 2026 – Fraus omnia corrumpit… Really? Paris courts and the enforcement of...
Navacelle is hosting a panel regarding Corruption and Arbitration on 24 March 2026, as part of the Paris Arbitration Week (PAW).