Since 2018, Lactalis has been suspected of committing tax fraud and laundering the proceeds of such fraud via schemes involving Luxembourg and Belgian entities. This investigation, launched 6 years ago, based on press revelations and fueled by a tax inquiry conducted by tax authorities, has reached a new procedural stage with these searches carried out at the group’s Paris and Laval premises, as well as at the home of its CEO.
On Tuesday 6 February 2024, 6 years after the opening of the investigation by the National Financial Prosecutor’s Office (Parquet National Financier hereinafter “PNF”), the Brigade nationale de répression de la délinquance fiscale (hereafter “BNRDF”) searched the premises of the Lactalis group, located in Laval and Paris, as well as the home of its CEO.[1]
In 2018, following revelations in the press, the PNF has launched a criminal investigation into the French dairy giant.[2]
Lactalis is suspected of having used fraudulent schemes to transfer its profits to companies based in Luxembourg and Belgium, to evade French tax. Supposedly committed over a period extending from 2009 to 2020, the schemes allegedly enabled the dairy group to avoid paying tax on several hundred million euros.[3]
In 2018, Confédération Paysanne (a French agricultural union) also commissioned a financial investigation from a journalist who had already made revelations about Lactalis. The journalist reported that he had discovered profits being channeled to a company incorporated under Luxembourg law.[4]
The journalist responsible for this investigation indicated that he had discovered payments of up to 1.99 billion euros by Lactalis to empty shell companies located in Belgium and Luxembourg, in 2017 alone.[5] According to this journalist, the method used by Lactalis is based on several mechanisms: the creation of fictitious debts, inter-company receivables and inter-subsidiary loans. Schemes were allegedly set up to transfer the debt and receivables of the French subsidiaries to the Belgian holding company. The Group would also have used equity loans between its subsidiaries and a shell company located in Luxembourg. This arrangement allegedly enabled the subsidiaries to reduce their profits by paying interest to the Luxembourg company, thereby drastically reducing their tax liability.[6]
In 2019, Confédération Paysanne reported the existence of a “particularly complex intra-group rebilling system, as well as a fictitious share purchase system” to the PNF, constituting, according to the union, “tax evasion”.[7]
In an article published in 2020, the investigative website Disclose revealed the results of the aforementioned journalistic investigation to the public, estimating that Lactalis had avoided paying French corporate tax for 220 million euros between 2013 and 2018.[8]
In parallel with the criminal investigation, Lactalis’ premises were also subject to searches conducted by tax authorities in 2019, a possibility provided for under article L.16B of the French Tax Procedures Code (hereinafter “LPF”), as part of a tax investigation. In 2022, this tax investigation resulted in the tax authorities having to report the matter to the PNF, pursuant to article L.228 of the LPF[9]. This new procedure, implemented since October 2018[10], requires tax authorities to report to the prosecutor any facts they have examined in the course of their tax investigations, and which have led to the application of the most serious penalties, when amounts involved in the fraud exceed €100,000.
This case is a further illustration of the PNF’s determination to fight against tax fraud: 363 of the 532 convictions resulting from PNF investigations were handed down in criminal tax law cases, while in 2023, offences against public finances accounted for almost half of the total litigation handled by the PNF.[11]
Related content
Press review
7 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 3 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s examination of the legality of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump,...
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Press review
31 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 27 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the decision to release former banker Wahib Nacer, who was convicted in the Libyan case...
Press review
24 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 20 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the formal notice issued to Airbus Atlantic by the French Human Rights League (LDH) for...
Publication
23 October 2025
CumCum: CACIB to settle with the French Financial Prosecutor over tax fraud case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 10th edition, focusing on the agreement settled by CACIB with the French Financial...
Press review
17 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 13 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the decision by the Swiss Public Prosecutor’s Office to close a case involving the FIFA...
Press review
10 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 6 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the allegations of diversion of €9 million in development aid to Somalia from the Swedish...
Press review
3 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 29 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the guilty plea entered by a businesswoman before the Southwark Crown Court in London for...
Event
26 September 2025
Ethical dilemmas for lawyers in compliance and financial crime matters
A round-table discussion held at the Concilium Network Global Summit in Warsaw on 26 September 2025, co-organised by Navacelle.
Press review
26 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 22 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the settlement reached by UBS ending a long-standing tax dispute in France, the filing of...
Analysis
22 September 2025
CJIP Surys: a fine, a compliance penalty and compensation for the victim
On 8 July 2025, SAS SURYS entered into a Judicial Public Interest Agreement (CJIP) in respect of acts of bribery...
Press review
19 September 2025
Press Review – Week of 15 September 2025
This week’s press review covers the dismantling of the darknet platform “DFAS” which led to the arrest of two suspects...
We use cookies to optimize our website and our services.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Préférences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.