Analysis
14 July 2017

Paris Bar vademecum for lawyers carrying out internal investigations

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017

 

NAVACELLE translated, for information purposes, the Vademecum for Attorneys tasked with carrying out an internal investigation, issued by the Paris Bar on July 12, 2017.

***

Vademecum for Attorneys tasked with carrying out an internal investigation

Through a resolution passed on March 8, 2016, the Paris Bar Council considered that internal investigations fell within the scope of an attorney’s professional tasks (excluding the activity of research and investigation provided for by article L621.1 of the National Security Code), under the scope of article 6.2 al. 5 of the National Regulations of the lawyers’ profession (RIN) (expertise activity), or under the scope of articles 6.1 and 6.2 al. 2 of the RIN (assistance and counselling activities).

In accordance with this resolution, recommendations were made with respect to this activity for the purpose of their incorporation in the RIBP.

Some of these recommendations are general in scope (1), others are specific to internal investigations carried out in the context of the assistance and advisory activities of attorneys (2) or to the internal investigation carried out by an attorney in his/her capacity as an expert.

 1. General recommendations

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation must comply with, under all circumstances, our essential principles (article 1.3 RIN). He/she will comply with the essential principles of conscience, independence, humanity, loyalty, delicacy, moderation, competence and prudence. He/she will refrain from exerting pressure on individuals he/she interviews;

The attorney will execute, with his/her client or the persons who appointed him/her, a contract which, in addition to the determination of costs, will define the scope of his/her retention;

Before any contact with third parties for the purpose of carrying out the internal investigation, he/she will explain his/her role and its non-coercive nature; inform them that they may not claim any attorney-client privilege with respect to exchanges and that what they say may be transcribed in his/her report in whole or in part.

2. Specific recommendations for the activity of internal investigation carried out by an attorney in the context of an assistance and counselling activities (articles 6.1 and 6.2 al. 2 of the RIN)

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation in the context of an assistance or counselling activity may be the usual attorney of the client who commissioned him/her or an attorney who has not previously worked for him/her;

In all circumstances, he/she will mention to the individuals he/she interviews in the course of the internal investigation that he/she is not their attorney but that he/she acts on behalf of the client who retained him/her to carry out this investigation;

He/she will explain to interviewees and to other persons contacted for the needs of the investigation that the attorney-client privilege binds him/her but not the client. Therefore, what the interviewee says what they say and any other information gathered during the investigation may be used by his/her client, so may be the report he/she may provide to his/her client.

He/she will inform the interviewee that he/she may be assisted or advised by an attorney when it appears, prior to or during the interview, that the interviewee may be held accountable for any wrongdoing at the outcome of the investigation;

When a statement is transcribed verbatim, he/she will offer to the interviewee an opportunity to review the statement and to sign it. He/she will refrain from providing him/her with a copy if the preservation of the confidentiality of the investigation requires otherwise – with regards to French or foreign rules on confidentiality -;

He/she may assist his/her client in a mutual agreement procedure or in a dispute, related or subsequent to the internal investigation, but will refrain from representing his/her client in such a procedure directed against an individual that he/she has interviewed during the internal investigation.

3. Specific recommendations for the activity of internal investigation carried out by an attorney in the context of an expertise activity (article 6.2 al. 5 RIN)

An attorney tasked with carrying out an internal investigation, in the context of an expertise activity, will not accept this mission if he/she already is the counsel, usual or not, of the person(s) retaining him/her;

He/she will mention that in the context of an expertise mission, the internal investigation is not subject to the attorney-client privilege; he/she will ensure that documents, correspondence and other exchanges related to this investigation are split from the matters he is tasked with carrying out as an attorney, in order to preserve the attorney-client privilege by which he/she is bound in this capacity.

When a deposition is transcribed verbatim, he/she will offer the interviewee an opportunity to review the statement and to sign it; he/she will provide a copy upon the interviewee’s request, except in specific circumstances.

He/she will refrain from representing one of the parties in any procedure relating to or arising from the internal investigation, even in an amicable procedure.

Related content

Publication
8 July 2025
Bastille Day Newsletter 2025
As they do every year for 14 July, Navacelle's lawyers offer you a selection of noticeable events which occurred in...
Analysis
20 May 2025
CJIP Paprec: criminal penalties applicable to violations of the rules governing public procurement
On 10 February 2025, Paprec signed a “Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public” – CJIP (equivalent to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement) to...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
28 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 24 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the search conducted at Sanofi’s headquarters by the National Anti-Fraud Office and the National Financial...
Analysis
27 November 2025
“CEO fraud” & banks’ liability: The French Court of Cassation clarifies
In two decisions dated June 12, 2025, the Court of Cassation clarified the conditions under which a bank may be...
Press review
21 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 17 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the appointment of Vincent Filhol as partner at Navacelle, strengthening the firm’s practice in white-collar...
Analysis
18 November 2025
Total found guilty of deceptive commercial practices related to environmental claims
On 23 October 2025, the 34th chamber of the Paris Judicial Court convicted TotalEnergies and TotalEnergies Electricité et Gaz under...
Press review
14 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 10 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the release, under judicial supervision, of Nicolas Sarkozy after twenty days in pre-trial detention, in...
Press review
7 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 3 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s examination of the legality of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump,...
Event
7 November 2025
Sapin 2: A Perspective on the Fight Against Corruption in France – Cornell University
A presentation to law students at Cornell University on 7 November 2025, of Sapin 2 law and the anticorruption enforcement in France.
News
6 November 2025
Vincent Filhol joins Navacelle as partner
Navacelle announces the arrival of Vincent Filhol as Partner, strengthening its criminal business law, investigations, and compliance practice.
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Press review
31 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 27 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the decision to release former banker Wahib Nacer, who was convicted in the Libyan case...
Press review
24 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 20 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the formal notice issued to Airbus Atlantic by the French Human Rights League (LDH) for...
Publication
23 October 2025
CumCum: CACIB to settle with the French Financial Prosecutor over tax fraud case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 10th edition, focusing on the agreement settled by CACIB with the French Financial...