Analysis
14 July 2017

Duty of care of parent and contracting companies law

Bastille Day Newsletter 2017 - Legislative Updates

 

The idea for this text stems from the necessity to adapt “the legal framework to the new reality of globalization” after the Rana Plaza disaster on April 24, 2013.

According to the authors of the bill filed at the National Assembly on February 11, 2015, the aim of this text is to give more responsibilities to “transnational companies in order to prevent the occurrence of disasters in France and abroad and to obtain reparation for the victims in case of violations of human rights and environmental damage”.

Obligation for parent and contracting companies to implement a monitoring program

Companies which have their registered office in France and which, at the end of two fiscal years employ at least 5000 people within the company and their French subsidiaries or employ at least 10 000 people within the company and their French and foreign subsidiaries, have the obligation to implement a monitoring program.

The law also aims at subsidiaries or controlled companies which exceed the thresholds mentioned as soon as the company which controls them implements and executes a monitoring program on the activities of the company and the activities of all of its subsidiaries or controlled companies.

This program includes reasonable monitoring measures allowing the identification of risks and the prevention of severe violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, damage to the health and security of individuals or to the environment resulting from the activities of the company, the activities of the companies it controls as well as subcontractors and suppliers with whom these companies have an established commercial relationship.

Among these monitoring measures, the following are cited:

  • Risk mapping aimed at identification, analysis and prioritization of risks
  • Regular evaluation procedure of the situation of subsidiaries, subcontractors or suppliers with whom an established commercial relationship is maintained
  • Actions for risk mitigation or prevention of several violations
  • A mechanism for warning and collection of reports relating to the existence or the realization of risks established in coordination with the company’s representative labor organizations.
  • A mechanism allowing the monitoring of measures implemented and the evaluation of their efficiency

This program is now part of the business report mentioned in Article L225-102-1 of the Commercial Code.

Removal of the fine provision by the Constitutional Council

Initially, the text provided that a company which would violate this obligation could be ordered to respect them after a formal notice and that it could be sentenced to pay a civil fine of 10 million euros.

This possibility of issuing a fine was rejected by the Constitutional Council in its decision dated March 23, 2017 since the terms of the obligation imposed to the company was not defined in sufficiently clear and precise terms.

Henceforth, in case of non-compliance with the duty of care, the company may be receiving formal notice to comply with the obligations set forth in this law. If the company does not comply with its obligations within three months from the receipt of the notice, the competent court may, at the request of a person having a legitimate interest in this regard, order the company to respect its obligations under financial compulsion.

The law also provides that any person who can establish a legitimate interest in this regard may take action against the company in order to obtain compensation of the damage that compliance with its obligations could have helped to avoid.

Commentators have regarded this new possibility as a new type of vicarious liability. However, it should be noted that the existence of a direct causal link between the infringements and the damage remains a condition to hold the parent company liable. Still, under this new law, a parent or a contracting company may be held liable for a damage which first originated in the acts of one of its subsidiaries as soon as its failure to implement a monitoring program is a direct cause of the damage.

Related content

Publication
8 July 2025
Bastille Day Newsletter 2025
As they do every year for 14 July, Navacelle's lawyers offer you a selection of noticeable events which occurred in...
Analysis
20 May 2025
CJIP Paprec: criminal penalties applicable to violations of the rules governing public procurement
On 10 February 2025, Paprec signed a “Convention judiciaire d'intérêt public” – CJIP (equivalent to a Deferred Prosecution Agreement) to...
Publication
13 September 2024
Cross-country insights: Addressing Corruption Allegations in Arbitration Disputes
This guide aims at providing a comprehensive understanding of how different countries handle allegations of corruption in the course of...
Press review
28 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 24 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the search conducted at Sanofi’s headquarters by the National Anti-Fraud Office and the National Financial...
Analysis
27 November 2025
“CEO fraud” & banks’ liability: The French Court of Cassation clarifies
In two decisions dated June 12, 2025, the Court of Cassation clarified the conditions under which a bank may be...
Press review
21 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 17 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the appointment of Vincent Filhol as partner at Navacelle, strengthening the firm’s practice in white-collar...
Analysis
18 November 2025
Total found guilty of deceptive commercial practices related to environmental claims
On 23 October 2025, the 34th chamber of the Paris Judicial Court convicted TotalEnergies and TotalEnergies Electricité et Gaz under...
Press review
14 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 10 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the release, under judicial supervision, of Nicolas Sarkozy after twenty days in pre-trial detention, in...
Press review
7 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 3 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the U.S. Supreme Court’s examination of the legality of the tariffs imposed by Donald Trump,...
Event
7 November 2025
Sapin 2: A Perspective on the Fight Against Corruption in France – Cornell University
A presentation to law students at Cornell University on 7 November 2025, of Sapin 2 law and the anticorruption enforcement in France.
News
6 November 2025
Vincent Filhol joins Navacelle as partner
Navacelle announces the arrival of Vincent Filhol as Partner, strengthening its criminal business law, investigations, and compliance practice.
Analysis
5 November 2025
Modernization and strengthening of the French Financial Markets Authority’s powers
On September 16, 2025, a bill was introduced in the National Assembly to increase the powers of the AMF and...
Press review
31 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 27 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the decision to release former banker Wahib Nacer, who was convicted in the Libyan case...
Press review
24 October 2025
Press Review – Week of 20 October 2025
This week’s press review covers the formal notice issued to Airbus Atlantic by the French Human Rights League (LDH) for...
Publication
23 October 2025
CumCum: CACIB to settle with the French Financial Prosecutor over tax fraud case
Navacelle contributes to The Legal Industry Reviews' 10th edition, focusing on the agreement settled by CACIB with the French Financial...