Publication
20 August 2021

It’s not an “ego fight”: The do’s and don’ts of monitorships

Experts from around the world discuss what authorities, companies and monitors should do to ensure that a period of compliance oversight ends successfully. “the quality of relationships between the regulator, the corporation, its employees and the monitor are the basis of the successful compliance monitorship” says Julie Zorrilla.

 

Companies dread monitorships. They are often expensive and intrusive, and occasionally they go wrong, elongating a company’s time under government scrutiny.

But the use of monitorships is only becoming more popular. Many US government agencies use them to make sure misbehaving businesses don’t reoffend. Multilateral development banks impose them as a way of ensuring business partners don’t misuse their funds. And government authorities outside the US – such as in Brazil and France – have recently started adopting their own form of monitorships.

Here, experts from the US, Brazil, the UK, France and Germany foin a roundtable, chaired by Sam Eastwood at Mayer Brown, to discuss their experiences working on monitorships, and how to ensure they end well for the enforcement agency, the company and the monitor […]

Related content

Press review
9 January 2026
Press Review – Week of 5 January 2026
This week’s press review covers the sanctions imposed by the French Financial Markets Authority’s Enforcement Committee against M Capital Partners...
Press review
19 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 15 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the submissions of the National Anti-Terrorism Prosecutor’s Office in the Lafarge trial concerning allegations of...
News
12 December 2025
Towards a French Legislative Framework for Internal Investigations
Following on from the report by the Club des juristes, co-authored by Raphaël Gauvain and Stéphane de Navacelle, the French...
Press review
12 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 8 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the risk of significant financial penalties facing several European states as a result of arbitration...
Publication
8 December 2025
National plan to fight corruption 2025-2029: a strengthened and ambitious framework
For the International Review of Compliance and Business Ethics, Vincent Filhol and Juliette Mourgues discuss the French government's adoption of...
Press review
5 December 2025
Press Review – Week of 1 December 2025
This week’s press review covers the opening of the trial of seven individuals accused of attempted fraud and corruption targeting...
Analysis
5 December 2025
The forthcoming Directive 2023/0135 (COD) on combating corruption
In its latest issue of L'Observateur de Bruxelles, the Delegation of French Bars (Délégation des Barreaux de France) has published...
Event
2 December 2025
[Training course] Corporate compliance: fundamentals and best practices – Lamy Liaisons Academy
Vincent Filhol regularly provides training on corporate compliance for Lamy Liaison Academy with Blanche Balian.
Press review
28 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 24 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the search conducted at Sanofi’s headquarters by the National Anti-Fraud Office and the National Financial...
Analysis
27 November 2025
“CEO fraud” & banks’ liability: The French Court of Cassation clarifies
In two decisions dated June 12, 2025, the Court of Cassation clarified the conditions under which a bank may be...
Event
22 November 2025
 The Importance of Contractual Strategies in Compliance
A course offered as part of the Master 2 in Business Law, Ethics, and Compliance (JAEC) program at the University...
Press review
21 November 2025
Press Review – Week of 17 November 2025
This week’s press review covers the appointment of Vincent Filhol as partner at Navacelle, strengthening the firm’s practice in white-collar...